Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/275,865

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED OPERATION AND HANDLING OF AUTONOMOUS TRUCKS AND TRAILERS HAULED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Priority
Feb 21, 2018 — provisional 62/633,185 +4 more
Examiner
WALLACE, ZACHARY JOSEPH
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Outrider Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
138 granted / 192 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
203
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 192 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on DATE has been considered and is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,366,856. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claim 1 of USP – 12,366,856 Claim 1 of US Application 19/275,865 A device for robotically opening rear swing doors of a trailer comprising: a frame adapted to receive adjacent thereto, trailer rear a member on the frame that moves in a plurality of degrees of freedom in relation to the frame and trailer, and includes structures that are arranged to manipulate a door securing assembly on the trailer; a door opening assembly that engages and swings the doors subsequent to unlocking; an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame. A device for robotically opening rear swing doors of a trailer comprising: a frame adapted to receive, adjacent thereto, trailer rear a member on the frame that moves in a plurality of degrees of freedom in relation to the frame and trailer, and includes structures that are arranged to manipulate a door securing assembly on the trailer; a door opening assembly that engages and swings the doors subsequent to unlocking; an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zevenbergen et al. (USP 9,457,970) – discloses a docking system for a semi-trailer unloading cargo, with the operations being performed robotically. However Zevengergen fails to explicitly disclose “an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame”. Olsen, III et al. (US 2006/0015233) – discloses remotely locking and unlocking both swing and roll doors of semi-trailers and trailers. However Olsen fails to explicitly disclose “an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame”. Rydberg (US 2010/0237653) – discloses automatically opening and closing swing doors for a cargo trailer. However Rydberg fails to explicitly disclose “an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame”. Lampsa (US 2018/0126830) – discloses structures and apparatus for opening and closing a cargo containment structure swing doors through mechanical means. However Lampsa fails to explicitly disclose “robotically opening rear swing doors of a trailer comprising” and “a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame”. Meredith et al. (US 2019/0064828) – discloses an autonomous yard vehicle system configured to move cargo trailers to and from docking areas and storage areas using a robotic autonomous yard robotic device. However Meredith does not explicitly disclose “an interface that guides the frame and the door opening assembly remotely; and a door-fixing assembly that retains each door in an open orientation after the trailer moves remote from the frame”. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY JOSEPH WALLACE whose telephone number is (469)295-9087. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wade Miles can be reached at (571) 270-7777. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Z.J.W./Examiner, Art Unit 3656 /WADE MILES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Aug 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700322
Method for Auto Populating Flight Status in Event of Aircraft Emergency
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12679327
DYNAMIC BATTERY CHARGE STRATEGY UTILIZING CURRENT AND PREDICTED VEHICLE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682702
VEHICLE DIAGNOSIS APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668252
ERROR-TOLERANT DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667960
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND CONTROL MODULES FOR CONTROLLING GRASPING BY ROBOT SYSTEMS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+21.8%)
2y 8m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 192 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month