Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/276,214

ROBOT ASSISTED INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS SELECTION AND IMPLANTATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Priority
Sep 24, 2018 — provisional 62/735,701 +2 more
Examiner
BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Simplify Medical Pty Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1222 granted / 1464 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1464 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are allowable over the prior art. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Most pertinent prior art, including U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2017/0265774 to Johnson et al., U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2005/0154296 to Lechner et al., and U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2014/0378999 to Crawford et al. disclose a surgical system for robot assisted intervertebral disc prosthesis placement. The system comprises a computing system for storing and processing a 3D model of first and second vertebrae adjacent a disc space and identifying positions of the first and second vertebrae and generating and storing position data for the positions of the first and second vertebrae, a robot, and a plurality of instruments configured to be coupled to the robot. The robot is configured to insert a cutter to the registered location to cut one or more bone cuts in at least one of the first and second vertebrae, and wherein the robot is configured to insert an intervertebral disc prosthesis corresponding in size to the desired size for the intervertebral disc prosthesis to the registered location with an inserter instrument. The prior art fails to teach or disclose, however, wherein the system includes a first trial instrument configured to be inserted between the first and second vertebrae to obtain an initial registration position, the initial registration position is a desired location for an intervertebral disc prosthesis with respect to the positions of the first and second vertebrae, and the computing system includes an interface including a user-selectable option for selecting one of the plurality of instruments to be sequentially delivered with the robot to the initial registration position. The prior art fails to teach or disclose, however, wherein the plurality of instruments including a first disc sizer configured to be inserted between the first and second vertebrae at a desired location for the selected intervertebral disc prosthesis with respect to the positions of the first and second vertebrae and wherein the computing system is configured to register position data for the intervertebral disc prosthesis location as a registered location, wherein the robot is configured to insert a second disc sizer and subsequent disc sizers to the registered location and removing the sizer until a desired size for the intervertebral disc prosthesis is determined Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 11 recites “The surgical method of claim 1…” Examiner believes the claim should read “The system of claim 1…” Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 6-7 of U.S. Patent No. 11,819,424. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both the present application and granted patent disclose a system for robot assisted intervertebral disc prosthesis placement. The system comprises a computing system for storing and processing the 3D model and the position data, a robot, a plurality of instruments including sizing templates, trials, cutters or placement instruments for intervertebral disc prostheses, wherein each of the plurality of instruments is configured to be coupled to the robot, wherein the plurality of instruments includes a first trial instrument configured to be inserted between the first and second vertebrae to obtain an initial registration position, wherein the initial registration position is a desired location for an intervertebral disc prosthesis with respect to the positions of the first and second vertebrae, and an interface on the computing system, the interface including a user-selectable option for selecting one of the plurality of instruments to be sequentially delivered with the robot to the initial registration position. The robot includes a guiding device which guides a trajectory of the plurality of instruments and provides a depth stop to limit a depth of insertion of the plurality of instruments. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER J BECCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-7391. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong can be reached at 571-272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J BECCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745996
SURGICAL SYSTEM AND METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746066
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A SPINAL ANATOMY REGISTRATION FRAMEWORK
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746048
SYSTEM OF A BONE ANCHOR AND AN ELONGATE INSTRUMENT
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740817
Transversely Displacing Structures in the Body
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733963
MULTIPLANAR FIXATION PLATE FOR FRACTURE REPAIR
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1464 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month