Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/276,993

DEEP LEARNING INFERENCE OPTIMIZATION AND BENCHMARKING FOR GATEWAY SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Priority
Jul 22, 2024 — provisional 63/673,863
Examiner
HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 690 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 690 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to an application filed July 22, 2025. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jeuk et al. (US 2021/0392049 A1). With respect to claim 1, Jeuk discloses a benchmarking method for enabling communication between data sources and an edge computing device via a gateway system ([0033]), the method comprising: receiving data from a plurality of sources, the plurality of data sources comprising data associated with a resource site (Abstract and [0014], receive operational data from various nodes of network topology); provisioning a computing model configured to characterize one or more features or properties associated with the resource site, the computing model being adaptable or configurable to be used on one of a first edge computing device or a cloud computing device ([0018] and [0054], generate a logical model for deployment); determining a first computational tool associated with the first edge computing device, the first computational tool being operable to: automatically extract device data associated with the first edge computing device ([0048], using service level agreements to extract information and provide it as input parameters for machine-learning engine), and quantize the computing model to optimally perform on the first edge computing device ([0050], receive performance level feedback of individual nodes within network topology); quantizing, using the first computational tool, the computing model and thereby generate a first quantized model with attendant benchmark data that indicates an efficacy of the computing model on the first edge computing device when the computing model is successfully deployed via the gateway system coupling the plurality of sources to the first edge computing device ([0020], [0022]-[0023], and [0050], obtain performance of deployed trained machine-learning models within network topology); and generating a report indicating image or textual information associated with how the computing model performs on the first edge computing device after deployment to the first edge computing device, the report being visualized on a graphical display device ([0014]. [0020], [0042], [0050], and [0067], output deployment performance levels to determine whether model should be updated; machine-learning engine may include visualization tool for data visualization). With respect to claim 2, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the computing model is a computer vision model ([0067]). With respect to claim 3, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the device data comprises one or more of: hardware data of the first edge computing device; software data of the first edge computing device; or firmware data of the first edge computing device ([0016]). With respect to claim 4, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 3, wherein the hardware data comprises one of: graphical display unit data associated with the first edge computing device; or central processing unit data associated with the first edge computing device ([0070]). With respect to claim 5, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein quantizing the computing model comprises stripping or trimming parameters of the computing model that contribute to model inefficiencies of the computing model on the first edge computing device ([0021]). With respect to claim 6, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein quantizing the computing model comprises optimizing the computing model to be compatible with one or more hardware accelerators of the first edge computing device ([0018]). With respect to claim 7, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein quantizing the computing model comprises: determining a computation float point for the computing model based on the extracted device data ([0108]); and automatically configuring the computing model to quickly execute computing operations associated with the resource site on the first edge computing device ([0068]). With respect to claim 8, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the first computational tool comprises one of an application programming interface (API) or a compiler ([0047]). With respect to claim 9, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the first computational tool comprises a computing platform configured for developing deep learning models ([0076]). With respect to claim 10, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the computing model comprises a machine learning model or an artificial intelligence model ([0070]). With respect to claim 11, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the gateway system comprises an Agora gateway system ([0029]). With respect to claim 12, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the gateway system is configured or coupled to sensor systems associated with collecting data at the resource site ([0043]). With respect to claim 13, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the resource site comprises a resource site associated with energy development ([0104]). With respect to claim 14, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, wherein the attendant benchmark data indicates baseline performance data associated with implementing the computing model on the cloud computing device ([0020]). With respect to claim 15, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 1, further comprising: determining a second computational tool associated with a second edge computing device ([0041]); quantizing, using the second computational tool, the computing model and thereby generate a second quantized model ([0050]); and deploying the second quantized model via the gateway system to the second edge computing device, the second edge computing device being operable to rapidly execute a plurality of computing operations associated with the resource site using the second quantized model (Abstract). With respect to claim 16, Jeuk discloses the method of Claim 15, wherein the first edge computing device and the second edge computing device are distinct from each other based on at least one of: first hardware of the first edge computing device being different from second hardware of the second edge computing device ([0033]-[0034]); first firmware of the first edge computing device being different from second firmware of the second edge computing device ([0033]-[0034]); or first software of the first edge computing device being different from second software of the second edge computing device ([0033]-[0034]). With respect to claim(s) 17-20, the system of claim(s) 17-20 does/do not limit or further define over the method of claim(s) 1-16. The limitations of claim(s) 17-20 is/are essentially similar to the limitations of claim(s) 1-16. Therefore, claim(s) 17-20 is/are rejected for the same reasons as claim(s) 1-16. Please see rejection above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ESTHER B. HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6a-2p ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached at 571-270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ESTHER B. HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458 September 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 22, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 30, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750407
Method and Apparatus for Security Management of Internet of Things Traffic, and Power Internet of Things System
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745076
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR USER AUTHENTICATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743254
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISCOVERING AUTOMATABLE TASKS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726549
NEXT GEN ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA) AND VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK (VPN) INCLUDING CLOUD SECURE ACCESS SERVICE EDGE (SASE)
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12706895
EMAIL-BASED AUTHENTICATION FOR SIGN IN AND SECURITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 7m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 690 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month