Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/282,096

INTUBATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Priority
Jul 19, 2016 — DE 102016113318.3 +2 more
Examiner
JONES, HEATHER RAE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 767 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 767 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bullard (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2012/0215069). Regarding claim 1, Bullard discloses an intubation system, comprising: an intubation instrument for capturing an image, wherein the intubation instrument has a first interface for providing an image signal representing the captured image, the first interface including a first web (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5A, and 5B; paragraph [0032] – the illumination bundle in channel 22 is connected to a suitable light source (not shown) and transmits light to the distal end 16 of the elongated blade 12 into an area beyond the distal end of the blade, e.g., the laryngeal area of the throat – the image channel 24 is provided to house a bundle of image transmitting fibers for transmitting visual images from the laryngeal area – this bundle is connected to a suitable image viewing device 50, such as a video monitor and transmits images of the areas proximate the distal end 16 of elongated blade 12 to the image viewing device 50 for observation – the working channel 26 communicates from the distal end 16 of blade 12 through the handle 30 to the stylet port 33; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used); a display device with a second interface for receiving the image signal, wherein the display device is provided and designed to display the image captured by the intubation instrument, the second interface including a second web (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5A, and 5B; paragraph [0032] – the illumination bundle in channel 22 is connected to a suitable light source (not shown) and transmits light to the distal end 16 of the elongated blade 12 into an area beyond the distal end of the blade, e.g., the laryngeal area of the throat – the image channel 24 is provided to house a bundle of image transmitting fibers for transmitting visual images from the laryngeal area – this bundle is connected to a suitable image viewing device 50, such as a video monitor and transmits images of the areas proximate the distal end 16 of elongated blade 12 to the image viewing device 50 for observation – the working channel 26 communicates from the distal end 16 of blade 12 through the handle 30 to the stylet port 33; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used); and wherein the first web of the first interface and the second web of the second interface are configured to visually align the intubation instrument to the second interface of the display device, so as to couple the intubation instrument with the display device, wherein electrical power is transmitted from the display device to the intubation instrument and the image signal is transmitted from the intubation instrument to the display device (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5A, and 5B; paragraph [0032] – the illumination bundle in channel 22 is connected to a suitable light source (not shown) and transmits light to the distal end 16 of the elongated blade 12 into an area beyond the distal end of the blade, e.g., the laryngeal area of the throat – the image channel 24 is provided to house a bundle of image transmitting fibers for transmitting visual images from the laryngeal area – this bundle is connected to a suitable image viewing device 50, such as a video monitor and transmits images of the areas proximate the distal end 16 of elongated blade 12 to the image viewing device 50 for observation – the working channel 26 communicates from the distal end 16 of blade 12 through the handle 30 to the stylet port 33; paragraph [0033] – power source for the entire system; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used). Regarding claim 2, Bullard discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claim 1 including that wherein the first interface is generally cylindrical and the first web protrudes radially from an outer surface of the first interface (Figs. 5A and 5B; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used). Regarding claim 3, Bullard discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1 and 2 including that wherein an area of the outer surface of the first interface is rotationally symmetric with respect to an axis of symmetry, and wherein the first web is parallel to the axis of symmetry (Figs. 5A and 5B; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used). Regarding claim 4, Bullard discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1-3 including that wherein an area of an outer surface of the second interface is rotationally symmetric with respect to an axis of symmetry, and wherein the second web is parallel to the axis of symmetry (Figs. 5A and 5B; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used). Regarding claim 5, Bullard discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1-4 including that wherein the first web and the second web have similar cross sections (Figs. 5A and 5B; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used). Regarding claim 6, Bullard discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1-5 including that wherein the first interface and the second interface are configured to transmit the electrical power and the image signal only when the first web and the second web are flush against each other (Figs. 5A and 5B; paragraph [0033] – power source for the entire system; paragraph [0038] – the adapter 40, as shown in Fig. 4 has a body 42 – the adapter body 42 is connected to the tubular channel 41 at connection 43 by screws 48 – the interior of the adapter body 42 is open to accommodate locking arms 45 controlled by quick release lever 44 – as shown in Fig. 5A of the adapter shows the locking arms 45 is a closed position, whereas in Fig. 5B the quick release lever 44 is moved counterclockwise placing the locking arms 45 in an open position – to attach the video imaging device 50 to the adapter, the locking rim 53 of the device is placed in the hollow position of the adapter body 42 and the lever 44 is moved counterclockwise to a closed position locking the video imaging device firmly in position as shown in Fig. 6 – other locking means such as a bayonet type locking system may be used; a secure connection would be required for full functionality). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art, alone or in combination, fails to teach or fairly suggest, in combination with all of the other elements claimed: the intubation system further including a cable, the cable having a third interface at a first end of the cable and with a fourth interface at a second end of the cable, wherein the third interface is configured to couple with the first interface of the intubation instrument the fourth interface is configured to couple with the second interface of the display device, the third interface including a third web and the fourth interface including a fourth web (dependent claim 7, which depends from claim 1; claims 8-20 depend from claim 7). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEATHER R JONES whose telephone number is (571)272-7368. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Fri.: 9:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at (571)272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HEATHER R JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481 September 5, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744973
PROGRAM SEARCHING FOR PEOPLE WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENTS OR BLINDNESS
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730504
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND OPERATION MICROSCOPE SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726680
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE ADAPTIVE PLAY SETTINGS
5y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717838
UTILIZING TEXT-BASED INPUT TO DYNAMIC SELECT AND PRESENT SPECIFIC PORTIONS OF AUDIOVISUAL CONTENT TO USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713092
4K CONTENT MEMORY FRAGMENTATION VIEWING COUNTERMEASURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+5.5%)
3y 4m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 767 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month