Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/282,254

Automated Dental Drill

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Priority
Aug 21, 2020 — continuation of 12/370,011
Examiner
MORAN, EDWARD JOHN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Perceptive Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
268 granted / 644 resolved
-18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +61% interview lift
Without
With
+61.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
81.9%
+41.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 644 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the abstract does not represent the claimed invention now recited in claim 1. The Examiner suggests using the Abstract from the Examiner’s Amendment in parent application 17000175. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,370,011. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Regarding claim 1, US 12370011 discloses an automated dental drill system for performing a dental procedure on a patient, the automated dental drill system comprising: a processor; an end effector comprising a dental tool configured for disposition at least partially in the patient's mouth and to there perform an operation on a tooth of the patient; a tooth clamp configured to releasably rigidly attach to at least one tooth of the patient; a drive assembly configured to remain outside the patient's mouth throughout the entire dental procedure, wherein the drive assembly: (a) is controlled by the processor and (b) is configured to position the end effector with a first at least three degrees of freedom, relative to the tooth clamp; a clamp connector configured to connect the tooth clamp to the drive assembly such that, when the tooth clamp is coupled to the drive assembly and the tooth clamp is attached to the at least one tooth, position and orientation of the drive assembly remain fixed, relative to the at least one tooth; a support structure; and a passive cantilever arm having a second at least three degrees of freedom and being mechanically coupled between the support structure and the drive assembly to support the drive assembly (see claim 1 of US 12,370,011). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see attached PTO892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD MORAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5349. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7 AM-4 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached at 571-270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD MORAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12653644
IMPLANT WITH HIGH PRIMARY STABILITY AND ACCELERATED SECONDARY STABILITY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12611286
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DENTAL CROWN RESTORATIONS USING PREFABRICATED SLEEVE-CROWN PAIRS
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12588976
DENTAL APPLIANCE REINFORCEMENT
4y 10m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588980
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH SNAP FITTED, NON-SLIDING ARCHWIRE
4y 6m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588979
ACTIVE SELF-LIGATING ORTHODONTIC BRACKET
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+61.0%)
3y 6m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 644 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month