Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/285,777

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADVERTISEMENT PLAYBACK BASED ON PREFERRED VIEWING DURATION

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Jul 30, 2025
Priority
May 30, 2022 — IN 202241030970 +2 more
Examiner
KURIEN, CHRISTEN A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
259 granted / 457 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
474
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§103
68.7%
+28.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 457 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-20 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12401864. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are different definitions or descriptions of the same subject matter varying in breadth and because of the claims in the instant application are broader than the claims in '864. A comparison of the claim language follows, where the similar language is underlined for identification: Instant Application 19/285,777 U.S. Patent No. 12401864 1. A method for displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: receiving, by an advertisement server, an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to an initiation of a media playback on the electronic device of a user; identifying, by the advertisement server, at least one eligible advertisement, based on the advertisement request; retrieving, by the advertisement server, an advertisement profile of the user; determining, by the advertisement server, a preferred viewing duration associated with each of the at least one eligible advertisement, based on a correlation of each of the at least one eligible advertisement with the advertisement profile of the user; and selecting, by the advertisement server, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device. A method for displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: receiving, by an advertisement server, an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to an initiation of a media playback on the electronic device of a user; identifying, by the advertisement server, at least one eligible advertisement, based on the advertisement request; retrieving, by the advertisement server, an advertisement profile of the user; determining, by the advertisement server, a preferred viewing duration associated with each of the at least one eligible advertisement, based on a correlation of each of the at least one eligible advertisement with the advertisement profile of the user; and obtaining, by the advertisement server, a summarized version of an advertisement selected from the at least one eligible advertisement based on the preferred viewing duration of the user. Instant Application 19/285,777 U.S. Patent No. 12401864 14. A method of displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: monitoring a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with an advertisement interaction behavior of a user, during at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device of the user; determining a correlation of the plurality of advertisement parameters with the advertisement interaction behavior of the user, to create an advertisement profile of the user; receiving an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to initiation of a media playback on the electronic device; and selecting, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device 13. A method of displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: monitoring a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with an advertisement interaction behavior of a user, during at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device of the user; determining a correlation of the plurality of advertisement parameters with the advertisement interaction behavior of the user, to create an advertisement profile of the user; receiving an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to initiation of a media playback on the electronic device; and obtaining, based on the correlation, a summarized version of a selected advertisement that matches the advertisement profile of the user, from a plurality of versions of the selected advertisement Instant Application 19/285,777 U.S. Patent No. 12401864 18. The server of claim 17, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute to the instructions to: obtain a summarized version of the advertisement selected from the at least one eligible advertisement based on the preferred viewing duration of the user; monitor at least one user interaction during at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device; determine a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with each of the at least one user interaction, and a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with a demographic data of the user; and create the advertisement profile of the user based on the plurality of advertisement parameters associated with the at least one user interaction 16. (original): A server comprising: at least one memory storing instructions; and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to: receive an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to an initiation of a media playback on an electronic device of a user; identify at least one eligible advertisement, based on the advertisement request; retrieve an advertisement profile of the user; determine a preferred viewing duration associated with each of the at least one eligible advertisement, based on a correlation of each of the at least one advertisement with the advertisement profile of the user; and obtain a summarized version of an advertisement selected from the at least one eligible advertisement based on the preferred viewing duration of the user. Claims 2-13, 15-17 of the instant application are similar to claims 2-12, 14-15, 17-21 in patent application ‘864. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20110010231 A1 to Price et al. (“Price”) and US 20140157306 A1 to Deo et al. (“Deo”). As to claim 1, Price teaches a method for displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: receiving, by an advertisement server, an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to an initiation of a media playback on the electronic device of a user (¶0008, The audiovisual system further comprises a system controller coupled to the storage subsystem. The system controller is responsive to the metadata and to the user profile corresponding to the user to select and retrieve a plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments from the storage subsystem and to dynamically assemble the retrieved plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments to form the audiovisual advertisement. The plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments is selected to tailor the audiovisual advertisement to the characteristic viewing preferences of the user) ; identifying, by the advertisement server, at least one eligible advertisement, based on the advertisement request (¶0022, . The audiovisual system 10 further comprises a preference determination module 60 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The preference determination module 60 is responsive to user input 70 and to the metadata 50 to generate one or more user profiles 80. Each user profile 80 is indicative of characteristic viewing preferences of a corresponding user. The audiovisual system 10 further comprises a system controller 90 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The system controller 90 is responsive to the metadata 50 and to the user profile 80 corresponding to the user to select and retrieve a plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 from the storage subsystem 40 and to dynamically assemble the retrieved plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 to form the audiovisual advertisement); retrieving, by the advertisement server, an advertisement profile of the user; determining, by the advertisement server, a preferred viewing duration associated with each of the at least one eligible advertisement, based on a correlation of each of the at least one eligible advertisement with the advertisement profile of the user (¶0022, the audiovisual system 10 further comprises a preference determination module 60 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The preference determination module 60 is responsive to user input 70 and to the metadata 50 to generate one or more user profiles 80. Each user profile 80 is indicative of characteristic viewing preferences of a corresponding user. The audiovisual system 10 further comprises a system controller 90 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The system controller 90 is responsive to the metadata 50 and to the user profile 80 corresponding to the user to select and retrieve a plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 from the storage subsystem 40 and to dynamically assemble the retrieved plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 to form the audiovisual advertisement). Price does not teach selecting, by the advertisement server, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device. Deo teaches selecting, by the advertisement server, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device (¶0099, summarized video advertisement). In view of the teachings of Deo, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the teachings of Price. The suggestion/motivation would be an incumbent need to engage users with the ads and content without making the ads a boring and to-be-avoided aspect of any online session. As to claim 2, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring, by the advertisement server, at least one user interaction during at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device (Price, ¶0041, playback); determining, by the advertisement server, a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with each of the at least one user interaction, and a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with a demographic data of the user (Price, ¶0059, corresponding advertising segment 32 that are in a demographic group identified as being of particular interest to the advertise; and creating, by the advertisement server, the advertisement profile of the user based on the plurality of advertisement parameters associated with the at least one user interaction (Price, ¶0081, parameters met for advertisement). As to claim 3, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 2, wherein the obtaining the summarized version of the advertisement comprises determining that a duration of the summarized version fits into a remaining amount of time at an end of a series of advertisements played subsequent to the initiation of the media playback on the electronic device of the user, the remaining amount of time being a difference between an allotted time for the series of advertisements and a duration of the series of advertisements other than the summarized version. (¶0040, can maintain a separate user profile 80 for each user. In certain embodiments, each user profile 80 includes information provided by the corresponding user via the user input 70 to identify the user and to distinguish the user from other users of the audiovisual system 10. This information can include, but is not limited to, name, demographic information such as age and sex, and hobbies and interests). As to claim 4, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 2, wherein the demographic data of the user comprises at least one of a purchasing preference, a viewed content, a visited application, an estimated worth of the user, or an action of another user in a same household as the user. (¶0030, timespan advertising segment). As to claim 5, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 4, wherein the plurality of advertisement parameters associated with each of the at least one user interaction, and the plurality of advertisement parameters associated with the demographic data of the user comprise at least one of an advertisement genre, an advertisement duration, or a user action associated with each advertisement displayed on the electronic device during the at least one advertisement playback (Price, ¶0070, skip advertisement). As to claim 6, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the user action associated with each advertisement displayed on the electronic device during the at least one advertisement playback comprises at least one of watching the advertisement, skipping the advertisement, changing a volume level, fast forwarding the advertisement, or viewing an additional detail associated with the advertisement (Price, ¶0096, the preferred advertisement time span of a user reflects whether the user prefers standard-length advertisements 30 or shortened-length advertisement Deo, ¶0099). As to claim 7, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 6, wherein the summarized version of the selected advertisement is associated with a first playback duration that is different than a second playback duration associated with an original version of the selected advertisement (¶0063, probability that the user will interact with the advertisement). As to claim 8, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 6, wherein the summarized version of the selected advertisement is associated with a higher probability of user interaction than the original version of the selected advertisement (¶0063, probability that the user will interact with the advertisement). As to claim 9, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 6, further comprising: providing, by the advertisement server, the summarized version of the selected advertisement, for display on the electronic device. (Deo, ¶0076, ¶0112). As to claim 10, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: providing, by the advertisement server, the summarized version of the selected advertisement and the original version of the selected advertisement, for display on the electronic device. (¶0134). As to claim 11, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the obtaining the summarized version of the advertisement selected from the at least one eligible advertisement based on the preferred viewing duration of the user comprises: determining, by the advertisement server, the summarized version of the selected advertisement by modifying at least one of a human face, a background, a voice, or a language in the selected advertisement, based on the advertisement profile of the user. (Price, (¶0022, the audiovisual system 10 further comprises a preference determination module 60 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The preference determination module 60 is responsive to user input 70 and to the metadata 50 to generate one or more user profiles 80. Each user profile 80 is indicative of characteristic viewing preferences of a corresponding user. The audiovisual system 10 further comprises a system controller 90 coupled to the storage subsystem 40. The system controller 90 is responsive to the metadata 50 and to the user profile 80 corresponding to the user to select and retrieve a plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 from the storage subsystem 40 and to dynamically assemble the retrieved plurality of stored audiovisual advertising segments 32 to form the audiovisual advertisement). As to claim 12, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: obtaining, by the advertisement server, a plurality of versions of each of a plurality of advertisements selected from the at least one eligible advertisement based on the preferred viewing duration of the user; and providing, by the advertisement server, the plurality of versions of each of the plurality of selected advertisements, for display on the electronic device (Deo, ¶0060). As to claim 13, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 12, wherein each of the plurality of versions of the plurality of selected advertisements are associated with a rank for displaying on the electronic device. As to claim 14, Price teaches a method of displaying an advertisement during a media playback on an electronic device, the method comprising: monitoring a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with an advertisement interaction behavior of a user, during at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device of the user (¶0040, interest of user based on viewing of advertisements); determining a correlation of the plurality of advertisement parameters with the advertisement interaction behavior of the user, to create an advertisement profile of the user (¶0046, profile created based on user views); determining a correlation of the plurality of advertisement parameters with the advertisement interaction behavior of the user, to create an advertisement profile of the user; receiving an advertisement request from a media playback service subsequent to initiation of a media playback on the electronic device; (¶0022). Price does not teach selecting, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device. Deo teaches selecting, based on the correlation, a version of an advertisement from among a plurality of versions for display on the electronic device (¶0099, summarized video advertisement). . In view of the teachings of Deo, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the teachings of Price. The suggestion/motivation would be an incumbent need to engage users with the ads and content without making the ads a boring and to-be-avoided aspect of any online session. As to claim 15, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 13, wherein the plurality of advertisement parameters comprise at least one of an advertisement genre, an advertisement duration, or a user action during playback of the advertisement (¶0030, timespan advertising segment). As to claim 16, Price and Deo teaches the method of claim 13, further comprising: monitoring a plurality of advertisement parameters associated with a demographic data of the user, during the at least one advertisement playback on the electronic device (Price, ¶0039, monitors users viewing patterns). As to claim 17, see the rejection of claim 1. As to claim 18, see the rejection of claim 2. As to claim 19, see the rejection of claim 3. As to claim 20, see the rejection of claim 6. As to claim 21, see the rejection of claim 7. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE A KURIEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5694. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 7:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached on 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE A KURIEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2421 /NATHAN J FLYNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707107
STREAMING PLATFORMS AND WEBSITES MEDIA DISCOVERY ENGINE AND RECOMMENDATION INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12689794
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OBSCURING PRESENTATION OF MEDIA OBJECTS DURING PLAYBACK OF VIDEO BASED ON INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER MEDIA OBJECTS
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12647638
SUPPORT INTERACTION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12634552
DISPLAY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634556
FILTERING TELEVISION CONTENT BASED ON VIEWER CLASSIFICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+27.3%)
3y 9m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 457 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month