Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/287,151

A NETWORK-ISOLATED CONTAINER-ATTACHED STORAGE MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Priority
Dec 21, 2024 — IN 202441101595 +1 more
Examiner
BAYARD, DJENANE M
Art Unit
2444
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nutanix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
670 granted / 801 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 801 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This is in response to communication filed on 7/31/25 in which claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 12,483495 to Henkel et al.. a. As per claim 1, Henkel et al teaches a deployment into a cloud-provided host network, the deployment comprising: an underlay network, the underlay network being formed of one or more routers of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 9, line 61, The underlay physical routers) and the underlay network forming an isolated namespace that is distinct from namespaces of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 14, lines 44-46, Each namespace of a Kubernetes cluster is isolated from other namespaces of the Kubernetes cluster); a container-attached storage module that is situated within the underlay network, wherein container-attached storage module operates within the isolated namespace (See col. 10, lines 42-53, … using namespace isolation functionality that allows complete isolation of an application's (e.g., a given container) view of the operating environment, including process trees, networking, user identifiers and mounted file systems. In some examples, containers may be deployed according to Linux Containers (LXC), an operating-system-level virtualization method for running multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a control host using a single Linux kernel); and a network interface component that facilitates network access to the container- attached storage module via a static IP address that is configured into the network interface component (See col. 19, lines 53-67). b. As per claim 9, Henkel et al teaches teaches a method for forming an underlay onto a cloud-provided host network, the method comprising: establishing an underlay network, the underlay network being formed of one or more routers of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 9, line 61, The underlay physical routers) and the underlay network forming an isolated namespace that is distinct from namespaces of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 14, lines 44-46, Each namespace of a Kubernetes cluster is isolated from other namespaces of the Kubernetes cluster); instantiating a container-attached storage module that is situated within the underlay network, wherein container-attached storage module operates within the isolated namespace (See col. 10, lines 42-53, …using namespace isolation functionality that allows complete isolation of an application's (e.g., a given container) view of the operating environment, including process trees, networking, user identifiers and mounted file systems. In some examples, containers may be deployed according to Linux Containers (LXC), an operating-system-level virtualization method for running multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a control host using a single Linux kernel); and configuring a network interface component that facilitates network access to the container-attached storage module via a static IP address that is configured into the network interface component (See col. 19, lines 53-67). c. As per claim 15, Henkel et al teaches a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a sequence of instructions which, when stored in memory and executed by one or more processors causes the one or more processors to perform a set of acts for forming an underlay onto a cloud- provided host network (See col. 38, lines 42-52), the set of acts comprising: establishing an underlay network, the underlay network being formed of one or more routers of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 9, line 61, The underlay physical routers ) and the underlay network forming an isolated namespace that is distinct from namespaces of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 14, lines 44-46, Each namespace of a Kubernetes cluster is isolated from other namespaces of the Kubernetes cluster); instantiating a container-attached storage module that is situated within the underlay network, wherein container-attached storage module operates within the isolated namespace namespace (See col. 10, lines 42-53, …using namespace isolation functionality that allows complete isolation of an application's (e.g., a given container) view of the operating environment, including process trees, networking, user identifiers and mounted file systems. In some examples, containers may be deployed according to Linux Containers (LXC), an operating-system-level virtualization method for running multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a control host using a single Linux kernel); and configuring a network interface component that facilitates network access to the container-attached storage module via a static IP address that is configured into the network interface component (See col. 19, lines 53-67). d. As per claims 2, 10 and 16, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein communication between components within the namespaces of the cloud-provided host network communicate with components within the isolated namespace via a pair of virtual ethernet interfaces (veth) (See col. 18, lines 59-67 and col. 1-18). e. As per claims 3, 11 and 17, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches The deployment of claim 1, wherein communication between a first operating system pod of a first worker node and a second operating system pod of a second worker node communicate over the underlay network without incurring a network address translation by the one or more routers of the cloud-provided host network (See col. 15, lines 57-59, In Kubernetes, by default all pods can communicate with all other pods without using network address translation). f. As per claims 4, 12 and 18, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein the underlay network is a cloud-provided subnet that hosts operating system pods and wherein the cloud-provided host network hosts application pods (See col. 31, lines 63-67 and col. 32, lines 1-15). g. As per claims 5, 13 and 19, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein the container-attached storage module is implemented as a Kubernetes pod (See col. 6, lines 1-19 and col. 7, lines 59-67 and col. 8, lines 1-6, col. 15, lines 9-32). h. As per claims 6, 14 and 20, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein the underlay network is configured using a container networking interface plug-in that includes both a native configuration path as well as a custom container-attached storage module configuration path (See col. 26, lines 49-57, Instantiated resources (whether native or custom) may be referred to as objects or as instances of the resource, which are persistent entities in SDN architecture 200 that represent an intent (desired state) and the status (actual state) of the SDN architecture 200. Configuration nodes 230 provide an aggregated API for performing operations on (i.e., creating, reading, updating, and deleting) configuration resources of SDN architecture 200 in configuration store). i. As per claim 7, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein the cloud-provided host network is hosted on a public cloud (See col. 9, lines 49-53). j. As per claim 8, Henkel et al teaches the claimed invention as described above. Furthermore, Henkel et al teaches wherein the cloud-provided host network is hosted on an on- prem private cloud (See col. 9, lines 49-52). Conclusion 4. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Publication No. 2020/0076685 to Vaidya et al teaches Multiple Networks for virtual Execution Elements. U.S. Publication No. 2020/0314015 to Mariappan et al teaches Configuring Service Load Balancers with Specified Backetn Virtual Networks. 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DJENANE BAYARD whose telephone number is (571)272-3878. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Follansbee can be reached at (571)272-3964. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DJENANE M BAYARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2444
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750325
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ROUTING IN A COMPUTER NETWORK BASED ON RESOURCES USED FOR IN-NETWORK COMPUTING
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750317
NETWORK STACK FOR TRANSMISSION OF APPLICATION DATA OVER NETWORK CONNECTIONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744742
NO EMPTY AND INITIAL ADVANCE FOR SELF-CLOCKED ROUND ROBIN SCHEDULER
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739177
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING DYNAMIC NETWORK SCALING BASED ON LEARNED PATTERNS AND SENSED DATA
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732462
APPLICATION FLOW-AWARE BROADBAND SERVICE WITH DATA CAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 12m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month