Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/288,427

LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A DETACHABLE PHOTO-VOLTAIC MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Priority
Aug 02, 2024 — provisional 63/678,967
Examiner
LY, TOAN C
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Globe Electric Company Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 492 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
499
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
81.5%
+41.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 492 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-2 and 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dahan (US 20230073453 A1) in view of Yueh (US 20040099302 A1). Regarding claim 1, Dahan discloses (Fig. 9) a solar coach light comprising: a power supply circuit 176 (¶72); a light source housing 120 (¶54) including: a light source 90 (¶60); the photo-voltaic module 135 is secured to a top wall of the light source housing (¶70), and a mounting bracket 112/116 extending outwardly and away from the light source housing (¶52). Dahan does not explicitly disclose an outwardly extending plateau, that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module is removably secured to, the photo-voltaic module having a pocket, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing and which is in electrical connection with the power supply circuit, wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is stowed in a first position in which the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing is received within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module and securely affixes the detachable photo-voltaic module to the light source housing, and wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is deployed in a second position in which the detachable photo-voltaic module is displaced from the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing. Yueh teaches (Fig. 7) a separable solar energy storage device comprising: an outwardly extending plateau 36, that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module 2 is removably secured to (¶34), the photo-voltaic module having a pocket, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing (¶34) and which is in electrical connection 4 with the power supply circuit (¶25), wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is stowed in a first position in which the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing is received within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module and securely affixes the detachable photo-voltaic module to the light source housing (¶34; Fig. 9), and wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is deployed in a second position in which the detachable photo-voltaic module is displaced from the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing (Fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the solar powered lamp of Dahan with the removable solar panel of Yueh in order to enable the solar panel to be positioned at the optimal location for absorbing solar energy (Yueh: ¶25). Regarding claim 2, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 1 above and further teaches wherein the photo-voltaic module has a configuration which matches the configuration of the top wall and sits on the top wall of the light source housing when stowed in the first position, and retained on the outwardly extending plateau of the light source housing (Yueh: ¶34, Figs. 7 & 9). Regarding claim 12, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 1 above and further teaches an annular light source diffuser which surrounds the light source and which is translucent (Yueh: ¶29). Regarding claim 13, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 12 above and further teaches wherein the light source housing includes four columns extending below the top wall of the light source housing, and a bottom wall connected to the four columns (Dahan: ¶60). Regarding claim 14, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 13 above and further teaches wherein the annular light source diffuser is at least partially surrounded by the light source housing (Dahan: ¶61-¶62; protective frame would surround shade/diffuser). Regarding claim 15, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 14 above but does not explicitly teach wherein the annular light source diffuser is cylindrical. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the shade of Dahan modified by Yueh as a cylinder or other well known geometric shape suitable for diffusing light known in the art by choosing from a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, with a reasonable expectation of success, as the court has “held that the configuration of the claimed disposable plastic nursing container was a matter of choice which a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found obvious absent persuasive evidence that the particular configuration of the claimed container was significant” (In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966)). See MPEP 2144.04 (IV) (B). Regarding claim 16, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 15 above and further teaches wherein the annular light source diffuser extends below the top wall of the light source housing, and the four columns extend further below the top wall of the light source housing than the annular light source diffuser (Dahan: Fig. 9; frame exists further from top than shade). Regarding claim 17, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 1 above and further teaches wherein the photo-voltaic module is secured to the light source housing by one or more of a mechanical lock 32 (Yueh: ¶31). Regarding claim 18, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 1 above and further teaches wherein the photo-voltaic module is secured to the light source housing by a tongue and groove lock (Yueh: Fig. 8). Regarding claim 19, Dahan discloses: a light source housing 120 (¶54) that the photo-voltaic module 135 secures to (¶70), and a mounting bracket 112/116 that affixes the light source housing to a surface (¶52). Dahan does not explicitly disclose an outwardly extending plateau that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module secures to and detaches from, and a pocket, of the photo-voltaic module, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing. Yueh teaches: an outwardly extending plateau 36 that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module 2 secures to and detaches from (¶34; Fig. 7), and a pocket, of the photo-voltaic module, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing (¶34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the solar powered lamp of Dahan with the removable solar panel of Yueh in order to enable the solar panel to be positioned at the optimal location for absorbing solar energy (Yueh: ¶25). Regarding claim 20, Dahan discloses: a light source housing 120 (¶54) that the photo-voltaic module 135 secures to (¶70). Dahan does not explicitly disclose an outwardly extending plateau that extends from a portion of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module secures to and detaches from, and a pocket, of the photo-voltaic module, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the portion of the light source housing Yueh teaches: an outwardly extending plateau 36 that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module 2 secures to and detaches from (¶34; Fig. 7), and a pocket, of the photo-voltaic module, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing (¶34). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the solar powered lamp of Dahan with the removable solar panel of Yueh in order to enable the solar panel to be positioned at the optimal location for absorbing solar energy (Yueh: ¶25). Claim(s) 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dahan modified by Yueh in view of Delap et al. (US 20170331267 A1). Regarding claims 10-11, Dahan modified by Yueh teaches the apparatus of claim 1 above but does not explicitly teach a post extending outwardly from within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module, wherein a cable electrically connecting the photo- voltaic module to the power supply circuit wraps around the post based on the detachable photo-voltaic module being stowed in the first position, and unwraps around the post based on the detachable photo-voltaic module being deployed in the second position (claim 10) nor a coil that is secured within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module, wherein a cable electrically connecting the photo-voltaic module to the light source housing retracts around the coil based on the photo-voltaic module being repositioned from the deployed second position to the stowed first position (claim 11). Delap teaches: A method for facilitating a solar electricity installation, comprising: producing a cable harness, including: pulling one or more solar power cables from a cable source by a turning spool; cutting each of the pulled solar power cables at a desired length; labeling each of the solar power cables; coiling the solar power cables suitably for the cable harness; and applying a respective connector to at least one end of at least one of the solar power cables in the coil (claim 7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide the power cable of Dahan modified by Yueh as wound or coiled around a spool as taught by Delap, while the power cable is stowed in the solar panel module pocket. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The cited prior art of record does not teach, fairly suggests or make obvious the specific combination of a light fixture with a securable and detachable photo-voltaic module, comprising: a power supply circuit; a light source housing including: a light source; an outwardly extending plateau, that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module is removably secured to, and a mounting bracket extending outwardly and away from the light source housing; the photo-voltaic module having a pocket, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing and which is in electrical connection with the power supply circuit, wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is stowed in a first position in which the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing is received within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module and securely affixes the detachable photo-voltaic module to the light source housing, and wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is deployed in a second position in which the detachable photo-voltaic module is displaced from the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing, wherein the photo-voltaic module has a configuration which matches the configuration of the top wall and sits on the top wall of the light source housing when stowed in the first position, and retained on the outwardly extending plateau of the light source housing, wherein the photo-voltaic module has a predefined height when on the top wall of the light source housing which matches the height of the mounting bracket based on the photo-voltaic module being secured to the outwardly extending plateau of the light source housing (claims 1-3); nor a light fixture with a securable and detachable photo-voltaic module, comprising: a power supply circuit; a light source housing including: a light source; an outwardly extending plateau, that extends from a top wall of the light source housing, and that the detachable photo-voltaic module is removably secured to, and a mounting bracket extending outwardly and away from the light source housing; the photo-voltaic module having a pocket, that removably receives the outwardly extending plateau extending from the top wall of the light source housing and which is in electrical connection with the power supply circuit, wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is stowed in a first position in which the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing is received within the pocket of the photo-voltaic module and securely affixes the detachable photo-voltaic module to the light source housing, and wherein the detachable photo-voltaic module is deployed in a second position in which the detachable photo-voltaic module is displaced from the outwardly extending plateau of the top wall of the light source housing, wherein the photo-voltaic module comprises: a photo-voltaic cell; a photo-voltaic cell frame that at least partially surrounds the photo-voltaic cell; and a photo-voltaic module mounting bracket that is secured to, and detaches from, the photo-voltaic cell frame (claims 1 & 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C LY whose telephone number is (571)270-7898. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Paik can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C LY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2025
Application Filed
May 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639539
Bioptic Barcode Readers
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639547
CHIP CARD WITH OPTIMISED COUPLING ANTENNAS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632690
ANTENNA DEVICE AND IC CARD HAVING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12619973
TRANSACTION OBJECT READER WITH CONFIGURABLE AMPLIFIER
1y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12596277
DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 2m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 492 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month