Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/288,749

SCREEN RECORDING CAMERA MODE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Priority
Nov 05, 2020 — continuation of 11/323,653 +1 more
Examiner
TEKLE, DANIEL T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Snap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
475 granted / 753 resolved
+3.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 753 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 5-6 and 8-9 of U.S. Patent No. 11,323,653 B1. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because see table as outlined below. Instant Application US Patent No. 11,323,653 B1 1. A method comprising: pausing a recording of a screen of a user device based on an opening of an application with a camera view user interface to display output of an image sensor of the user device; concealing the output of the image sensor of the user device; providing a first user selectable element to reveal the output of the image sensor of the user device and to resume the recording of the screen of the user device; and providing a second user selectable element to stop the recording of the screen of the user device. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein pausing the recording of the screen of the user device comprises: detecting a selection of a notification from the application, the notification presented on the screen of the user device. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein pausing the recording of the screen of the user device comprises: detecting a selection of the application from a set of applications executing in a background focus of the user device. 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to a selection of the first user selectable element, executing the application in a background focus of the user device. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing a camera options panel that includes a third user selectable element to set a camera mode for the image sensor. 1. A method comprising: in a messaging system that hosts a backend service for a messaging client, generating a camera view user interface including a screen recorder user selectable element that is actionable to request recording of an output of a display system shown on a screen of a client device, the camera view user interface configured to display output of a digital image sensor of a camera; at the messaging client having a foreground focus of the screen of the client device, detecting activation of the screen recorder user selectable element; in response to the detecting of the activation of the screen recorder user selectable element, removing the foreground focus from the messaging client and causing recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen of the client device; subsequent to the causing of the recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen of the client device, detecting a request to restore the foreground focus of the screen of the client device to the messaging client; in response to the detecting of the request to restore the foreground focus of the screen of the client device to the messaging client: pausing the recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen, opening the messaging client to the camera view screen while concealing display of the output of a digital image sensor, and causing presentation of a first user selectable element that is actionable to terminate the recording of the screen. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein concealing the output of the image sensor comprises: overlaying the output of the image sensor with a solid color overlay. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the opening the messaging client to the camera view screen while concealing display of the output of the digital image sensor comprises overlaying the output of the digital image sensor with a solid color overlay. 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing a dialog requesting a selection of the first user selectable element to resume the recording of the screen of the user device or the second user selectable element to stop the recording of the screen of the user device. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to a selection of the first user selectable element, revealing the output of the image sensor and resuming the recording of the screen of the user device. 6. The method of claim 1, comprising, in response to the detecting of the request to restore the foreground focus of the screen of the client device to the messaging client the system, causing presentation of a dialog comprising the first user selectable element that is actionable to terminate the recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen and a second user selectable element that is actionable to resume the recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen. 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to a selection of the second user selectable element, terminating the recording of the screen of the user device. 8. The method of claim 6, comprising: detecting activation of the second user selectable element; and in response to the detecting of the selection of the second user selectable element, terminating the recording of the output of the display system shown on the screen. 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing a result of the recording as a screen recording video; detecting a request to communicate the screen recording video to a recipient device; and in response to the request, communicating the screen recording video to the recipient device. 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: storing a result of the recording of the output screen as a screen recording video; at a messaging client, detecting a request to communicate the screen recording video to a recipient in the messaging system; and in response to the request, communicating the screen recording video to the recipient in the messaging system. Claims 11-19 list all similar elements of claims 1-9, but in system form rather than method form. Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claims 1-9 applies equally as well to claims 11-19. Claim 20 list all similar elements of claim 1, but in non-transitory machine-readable medium form rather than method form. Therefore, the supporting rationale of the rejection to claim 1 applies equally as well to claim 20. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL T TEKLE whose telephone number is (571)270-1117. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at 571-272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL T TEKLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701330
IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS AND MOBILE CLEANING ROBOT
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697926
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING BLIND SPOT IMAGE THROUGH PILLAR OF VEHICLE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694983
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR MELANOMA PATHOLOGY USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12653392
AUDIOVISUAL TELECONFERENCING WITH IMAGE DATA CAPTURED BY A MEDICAL SCOPE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645763
SYNCHRONIZING IMAGE DATA WITH EITHER VEHICLE TELEMATICS DATA OR INFRASTRUCTURE DATA PERTAINING TO A ROAD SEGMENT
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (-6.4%)
3y 6m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 753 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month