Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/292,146

METHOD FOR COLLECTING AND SHARING LIVE VIDEO FEEDS OF EMPLOYEES WITHIN A DISTRIBUTED WORKFORCE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Priority
Jun 21, 2016 — provisional 62/353,009 +5 more
Examiner
TEITELBAUM, MICHAEL E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Broadpath Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
699 granted / 889 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
922
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
65.2%
+25.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 889 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the fifth camera" in line 17. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the sixth camera" in line 19. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following was found to be the closest pertinent prior art: Bhat et al. US 2013/0063542 teaches videoconferencing software in each individual has a portal to access the video feeds of the other participants. Bhat teaches in paragraph [0018] that both employees and managers may be included, which is equivalent to employee and manager portals. Bhat Figure 4A-B teach up to five video feeds being distributed between users in graphical user interface 402 or 430. Figures 1A and 3 illustrate at least three different computing devices with a graphical user interface 216a0c. The Examiner interprets that each feed necessarily has a frame rate. Decker US 2015/0281648 teaches a media conferencing system (title). Decker paragraph [0044] teaches Each participant 410 sends its main video feed (e.g., its camera source) and optionally one or more content feeds 415 upstream to a centralized entity 420. The centralized entity 420, in turn, sends back a high resolution/bandwidth video stream 417 of the active speaker and the content stream(s), if they exist. Where there are multiple active speakers, the centralized entity 420 may return multiple streams 417 representing the subset of active speakers in some embodiments. While Decker teaches increasing resolution of the speakers feed, Decker is deficient in teaching an increased frame rate for all participants when a video conference is activated. Decker is also deficient in teaching distributing a feed (seventh feed) of a third frame rate as well as distributing feeds at the second frame rate to the second and third computing devices. Bader-Natal et al. US 2016/0073059 teaches providing feedback in a virtual conference (title). Bader-Natal teaches in paragraph [0083] when a participant is designated as the current speaker and is provided with the central speaking position within the GUI, that participant's client may capture video having a relatively higher resolution and/or frame rate than when the participant is not the speaker (i.e., and the video of the user is rendered within a small thumbnail region of the GUI). Choosing higher quality video for only the current speaker (or current set of speakers if multiple speakers are permitted) significantly reduces the bandwidth requirements of the system. While Bader-Natal teaches increasing the frame rate of the speakers feed, Bader-Natal is deficient in teaching an increased frame rate for all participants when a video conference is activated. Bader-Natal is also deficient in teaching distributing a feed (seventh feed) of a third frame rate as well as distributing feeds at the second frame rate to the second and third computing devices. Ortiz US 7,884,855 teaches a display system for displaying multiple camera perspectives (title) such as front-facing and side-facing (Figure 7 images 124 and 126, inter alia) in response to a user selection. While these features are not explicitly claimed they are part of the disclosure and may be interpreted that first through third feeds could be side facing and fourth through sixth feeds are front facing. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: As indicated above, the prior art teaches conventional features such as providing for different video feeds, activating conferences, detecting speakers and increasing frame rate of particular feeds. However, all the claimed features are not known either alone or in combination from the prior art. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL E TEITELBAUM, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-5996. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Miller can be reached at 571-272-7353. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL E TEITELBAUM, Ph.D./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2422
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700714
Method for Operating a Control and Monitoring Device for a Rotating Laser, the Control and Monitoring Device, and the Rotating Laser
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701323
VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM USING IMAGE DATA TRANSMISSION AND POWER SUPPLY VIA A COAXIAL CABLE
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696006
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695852
HIGH BRIGHTNESS PROJECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687737
APPARATUS AND METHODS TO RENDER 3D DIGITAL CONTENT HAVING MULTIPLE VIEWS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 4m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 889 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month