Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/293,520

Priority of Sidelink Reference Signal Transmission

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Priority
Apr 06, 2023 — provisional 63/457,764 +2 more
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 634 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/2/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 11-15 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (hereinafter Chen)(US 2026/0006626) in view of Hosseini et al. (hereinafter Hosseini)(US 2023/0084636). Regarding claim 1, Chen teaches a first wireless device comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the first wireless device (fig. 8, 12-13; first wireless device could be 115-a in Fig. 9)to: receive, from a second wireless device(P[0138], UE 115-a receive signaling from another UE 115-c or a base station (P[0138], network entity 105) a configuration indicating a sidelink (SL) resource pool, wherein the SL resource pool comprises a slot in which one or more SL reference signals (RSs) are transmitted(P[0138], indicating asset of SL reference signal transmission occasions) and transmit, to a third wireless device and via the slot, sidelink (SL) SL control information indicating a first priority of an SL transmission of the slot(P[0005], control information that schedules sidelink data and also sidelink reference signal transmission; control signaling indicating a first priority of an SL transmission of the slot comprising SL data and at least one SL reference signal (RS); P[0139], item 910 in Fig. 9, UE 115-a and UE 115-b may participate in communication (e.g. transmit or receive) SCI(sidelink control information) that schedules sidelink data transmission from the UE 115-1 to UE 115-b; resources partially overlap in time with include sidelink reference signal transmission occasions; SCI message includes information indicative of a priority value for a scheduled sidelink data message)wherein: the SL transmission comprises: SL data in one or more first symbols of the slot and at least one SL RS in one or more second symbols, of the slot: (P[0005], control signal schedules sidelink data and sidelink reference signal; P[0103], UE 115-a may prioritize S-SSB reception if an S-SSB 405 has not been received in any prior candidate S-SSB occasions within a threshold time period (e.g., within an S-SSB period) of the candidate S-SSB occasion 225 and may prioritize PSSCH reception otherwise): and the first priority is based on a second priority of the at least one SL RS; and a third priority of the SL data(P[0052], prioritize one of a sidelink reference signal or sidelink data signal; select the highest priority value or lowest priority value for sidelink reference signal based on comparison; ). Also further teachings in P[0005-0008, 0012, 0014, 0020, 0029, 0030-0032, 0036-0037, 0052, 0163, 0175, 0184, 0200, 0211-0248)/ Chen did not teach specifically SL data in one or more first symbols of the slot and at least one SL RS in one or more second symbols, of the slot, that are after the one or more first symbols. However, Hosseini teaches in an analogous art SL data in one or more first symbols of the slot and at least one SL RS in one or more second symbols, of the slot, that are after the one or more first symbols(Fig. 5; also P[0085]). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary sill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have SL data in one or more first symbols of the slot and at least one SL RS in one or more second symbols, of the slot, that are after the one or more first symbols in order to have improved signal demodulation. Regarding claim 2, Chen teaches the first wireless device, wherein the slot of the SL resource pool is used for transmission of the at least one SL RS(P[0153], configured; signaling indicating sidelink reference signal occasions being included within a sidelink resource pool). Regarding claim 3, Chen teaches the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein transmitting the SL control information is via an SL resource of the SL resource pool(P[0153], control signaling indicating signal transmission occasions being included within a sidelink resource pool). Regarding claim 4, Chen teaches the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the configuration is transmitted via at least one of: a radio resource configuration message; or a system information message(P[0100], configured by control signaling, RRC signaling). Regarding claim 5, Chen teaches the first wireless device of claim 1, wherein the instructions further cause the first wireless device to determine the first priority based on a highest priority of: the second priority; and the third priority(P[0006], comparison of a first priority value and a second priority value). Claims 11-15 and 20 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1-5 and 1 respectively. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-9, 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (hereinafter Chen)(US 2026/0006626) in view of Hosseini et al. (hereinafter Hosseini)(US 2023/0084636) and Luo et a. (hereinafter Luo)(CN 117997496 A). Regarding claim 6, Chen in view of Hosseini teaches all the particulars of the claim except, wherein: the SL data comprises a medium access control (MAC) packet data unit (PDU). However, Luo teaches in an analogous art wherein: the SL data comprises a medium access control (MAC) packet data unit (PDU) (P[0100], MAC -CE). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the SL data comprises a medium access control (MAC) packet data unit (PDU) in order to have improved efficiency. Regarding claim 7, Chen in view of Hosseini teaches all the particulars of the claim except, wherein the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU. However, Luo teaches in an analogous art wherein the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU(Page 9, MAC-PDU; highest priority in all logical channels; SL-PRS). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU in order to have improved sidelink priority handling. Regarding claim 8, Chen in view of Hosseini teaches all the particulars of the claim except, the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU. However, Luo teaches in an analogous art wherein the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU(Page 13, highest priority and one MAC CE in the MAC PDU; also SL-PRS). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the first priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU in order to have improved sidelink priority handling. Regarding claim 9, Chen in view of Hosseini teaches all the particulars of the claim except, wherein the priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU. However, Luo teaches in an analogous art wherein the priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU(Page 13, highest priority in all logical channels and one MAC CE in the MAC PDU; also SL-PRS). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the priority is a highest priority of: the at least one SL reference signal; a logical channel associated with the MAC PDU; and a MAC control element (CE) in the MAC PDU in order to have improved sidelink priority handling. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al. (hereinafter Chen)(US 2026/0006626) in view of Hosseini et al. (hereinafter Hosseini)(US 2023/0084636) and Luo et a. (hereinafter Luo)(CN 117997496 A) and Han et al. (hereinafter Han)(US 2025/0274952). Regarding claim 10, Chen in view of Hosseini and Luo teaches all the particulars of the claim except, wherein the MAC PDU comprises a MAC service data unit (SDU) from the logical channel associated with a respective priority or a respective priority value. However, Han teaches in an analogous art wherein the MAC PDU comprises a MAC service data unit (SDU) from the logical channel associated with a respective priority or a respective priority value(P[0107], Sidelink traffic channel service data units; priority; SL-MAC-PDU for SL transmission). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the MAC PDU comprises a MAC service data unit (SDU) from the logical channel associated with a respective priority or a respective priority value in order to have improved sidelink priority handling. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 29, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706662
ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT FOR MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701622
Connection Resume Request Method and Apparatus
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695820
SMARTPHONE CASE WITH REAR-FACING VIEWFINDER DISPLAY
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12634970
TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING REFERENCE SIGNAL PATTERNS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
8y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634865
REPORTING MEASUREMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR POSITIONING
4y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month