Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/294,148

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHAI MINH
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Quectel Wireless Solutions Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1107 granted / 1271 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1301
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1271 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-11 and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nattha et al. (US 20230077982 A1) in view of Park et al. (US 20190132066 A1) Considering claims 1, 17, Nattha teaches a method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, by a terminal device (UE), first information from a network device (BS 904), wherein the network device corresponds to a serving cell of the terminal device (Fig.9, [0066]-[0067] At 906, the base station 904 may transmit a beam refinement configuration to the UE 902), wherein the first information an indicator indicating whether transmit sweeping (Fig.1, 5-9, [0061]-[0063], [0072] UE may receive a beam refinement configuration), determining, based on the first information, at least one of a first transmit beam or a first receive beam on a first time unit (Fig.1, 9-10, [0037] The UE 104 may receive the beamformed signal from the base station 180 in one or more receive directions 182″. The UE 104 may also transmit a beamformed signal to the base station 180 in one or more transmit directions, [0074] UE may identify the refined beam for the serving cell based on the sweeping of the multiple beams). Nattha do not clearly teach an indicator indicating whether transmit beam sweeping performed by a first neighbor cell is synchronized with transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell. Park teaches an indicator indicating whether transmit beam sweeping performed by a first neighbor cell (gNB2) is synchronized with transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell (gNB1) (Fig.20-21, [0229] synchronization signal and/or receiving a signal…. synchronization signal scheduling information and/or a synchronization signal sequence may be used to identify a swept beam, [0230], [0235]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filling date of the application to provide above teaching of Park to Nattha, in order to improve communication reliability by supporting beam related handover parameter configurations between neighboring base stations. Considering claims 2, 19, Nattha teaches wherein the first information is further used for the terminal device to determine the beam directions and the sending times of the plurality of transmit beams corresponding to at least one of the serving cell or the first neighbor cell (Fig.5-9), and the method further includes: determining, by the terminal device, the first receive beam based on a transmit beam corresponding to the first time unit among the plurality of transmit beams (Fig.1, [0037] The base station 180/UE 104 may perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station 180/UE 104); and receiving, by the terminal device, a signal on the first time unit through the first receive beam (Fig.1, [0037] The base station 180/UE 104 may perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station 180/UE 104). Considering claims 3, 20, Nattha teaches wherein the first information is used for the terminal device to determine the first receive beam on the first time unit, and when a beam direction of a transmit beam of at least one of the serving cell or the first neighbor cell on the first time unit is a degrees, a receive direction of the first receive beam is a+180 degrees (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037] The base station 180/UE 104 may perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station 180/UE 104). Considering claim 4, Nattha teaches wherein the first information is received over broadcast signaling ([0067]). Considering claim 5, Nattha teaches wherein the first information is carried in a management information base (MIB) or a system information block (SIB) ([0048]). Considering claim 6, Nattha teaches wherein the first information indicates synchronization between the transmit beam sweeping performed by the first neighbor cell and the transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell, the synchronization includes one or both of time synchronization and direction synchronization between the transmit beam sweeping performed by the first neighbor cell and the transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell (Fig.1, [0037] The base station 180/UE 104 may perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station 180/UE 104), and the first receive beam is determined according to a transmit beam of the serving cell on the first time unit ([0037], [0061]). Considering claim 7, Nattha teaches wherein the first information includes the offset value of the transmit beam sweeping performed by the first neighbor cell relative to the transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell (Fig.5-9, [0041], [0061]-[0063] FIG. 5, a time delta Δt 506 may be present between the serving cell SSB X 502 and the neighbor cell SSB X 504), the offset value includes at least one of a time offset value or a direction offset value, and the beam direction of the first receive beam is determined according to a transmit beam of the serving cell on the first time unit and the offset value (Fig.5-9, [0041], [0061]-[0063] FIG. 5, a time delta Δt 506 may be present between the serving cell SSB X 502 and the neighbor cell SSB X 504). Considering claim 8, Nattha teaches wherein the first receive beam is one of a plurality of receive beams for the terminal device to perform beam sweeping on at least one of the serving cell or the first neighbor cell, and a number of receive beams of the terminal device is different from a number of transmit beams of one or both of the serving cell and the first neighbor cell. Considering claim 9, Nattha teaches wherein the first neighbor cell is any one of a plurality of neighbor cells corresponding to the terminal device, the first information is used for the terminal device to determine a plurality of transmit beams corresponding to the plurality of neighbor cells (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]), and the method further includes: determining, by the terminal device, one or more receive beams corresponding to the plurality of neighbor cells via the plurality of transmit beams, wherein the one or more receive beams are used for the terminal device to measure the plurality of neighbor cells (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]). Considering claim 10, Nattha teaches wherein when a number of the plurality of transmit beams corresponding to the plurality of neighbor cells and a number of transmit beams of the serving cell are different, the method further includes: determining, by the terminal device, transmit beams of each of the plurality of neighbor cells or transmit beams of the serving cell on the first time unit based on a maximum transmit beam number, wherein the maximum transmit beam number is a maximum value of a plurality of transmit beam numbers corresponding to the plurality of neighbor cells and the serving cell (Fig.1, [0037] The base station 180/UE 104 may perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station 180/UE 104). Considering claim 11, Nattha teaches wherein the beam directions and sending times of the plurality of transmit beams corresponding to at least one of the serving cell or the first neighbor cell are received from a core network (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]). Considering claim 14, Nattha teaches wherein the first neighbor cell is any one of a plurality of neighbor cells corresponding to the terminal device, the first information further includes a maximum transmit beam number corresponding to a first valid region (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]). Considering claim 15, Nattha teaches wherein the plurality of transmit beams corresponding to one or both of the serving cell and the first neighbor cell are used to carry synchronization signal blocks (SSBs) (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]). Considering claim 16, Nattha teaches wherein the first information includes beam directions and sending times of a plurality of transmit beams corresponding to one or both of the serving cell and the first neighbor cell (Fig.1, 5-9, [0037], [0061]). Considering claim 18, Nattha teaches an apparatus, comprising: at least one processor; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media coupled to the at least one processor and storing programming instructions for execution by the at least one processor (Fig.1, 3), wherein the programming instructions, when executed, cause the apparatus to perform operations comprising: receiving, by a terminal device (UE), first information from a network device (BS 904), wherein the network device corresponds to a serving cell of the terminal device (Fig.9, [0066]-[0067] At 906, the base station 904 may transmit a beam refinement configuration to the UE 902), wherein the first information an indicator indicating whether transmit sweeping (Fig.1, 5-9, [0061]-[0063], [0072]), determining, based on the first information, at least one of a first transmit beam or a first receive beam on a first time unit (Fig.1, 9-10, [0037] The UE 104 may receive the beamformed signal from the base station 180 in one or more receive directions 182″. The UE 104 may also transmit a beamformed signal to the base station 180 in one or more transmit directions, [0074] UE may identify the refined beam for the serving cell based on the sweeping of the multiple beams). Nattha do not clearly teach an indicator indicating whether transmit beam sweeping performed by a first neighbor cell is synchronized with transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell. Park teaches an indicator indicating whether transmit beam sweeping performed by a first neighbor cell (gNB2) is synchronized with transmit beam sweeping performed by the serving cell (gNB1) (Fig.20-21, [0229] synchronization signal and/or receiving a signal…. synchronization signal scheduling information and/or a synchronization signal sequence may be used to identify a swept beam, [0230], [0235]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filling date of the application to provide above teaching of Park to Nattha, in order to improve communication reliability by supporting beam related handover parameter configurations between neighboring base stations. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-13 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAI MINH NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-7923. The examiner can normally be reached 6-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAI M NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604176
EMBEDDED SUBSCRIBER IDENTIFICATION MODULE WITH SECURE PROFILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598503
RADIO INTERFACE MEASUREMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588863
Systems and methods for preventing and treating wrinkles
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587850
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ENFORCING POLICY COMPLIANCE OF VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581402
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CELL SELECTION, TERMINAL, NETWORK DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1271 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month