Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/303,343

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ANTEGRADE TRANSCATHETER VALVE REPAIR OR IMPLANTATION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Aug 18, 2025
Priority
Oct 07, 2022 — CIP of 11/759,315 +4 more
Examiner
ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
VANTIS VASCULAR, INC.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
371 granted / 597 resolved
-7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
624
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 597 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 4/27/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of 11,766,328 and 12,390,328 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,759,315. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH WEBB ALEMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5749. The examiner can normally be reached M, Tu, Th, Fr 9am - 3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached at 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH W ALEMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §101
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Apr 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685653
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TREATING BIFURCATING BLOOD VESSELS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12653706
MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648787
TRANSCATHETER DEVICE FOR INTERATRIAL ANASTOMOSIS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642677
IPSILATERAL HYPOGASTRIC STENT GRAFT DELIVERY SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12616575
LEAFLET EXTENSION FOR CARDIAC VALVE LEAFLET
4y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 8m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 597 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month