Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/303,539

DISPLAY CONTROLLER, METHOD OF CONTROLLING DISPLAY CONTROLLER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Priority
Sep 09, 2024 — JP 2024-155065
Examiner
MICHAUD, ROBERT J
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
519 granted / 621 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 621 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in 09/10/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the Japanese Application 2024-155065 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1, 10 and 11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 10 and 11 include the limitations “a display controller that displays content received by a communication device from outside by a plurality of display units” and “a first communication speed between the communication device and the outside”. The office is unclear what the applicant means by “from outside and “the outside”. The Applicant’s specification suggests the outside is a “base station” and that “The vehicle 1 includes a communication device 25”. It appears that the applicant is discussing receiving external signals from outside of the vehicle however it uses the phrase “from outside. Are the signals coming from a piece of hardware like a base station a communication network rather than “from outside”. The office suggests describing the content being transmitted and received from external sources rather than using an indefinite term like “outside”. If the applicant specification describes a term then the applicant must be limited to what he has described as his definition. Appropriate correction with support in the specification must be made by the applicant to clarify the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 10 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumura et al., US Patent Application (20230325139), hereinafter “Matsumura” and Sandoval et al., US Patent Application (20190098067), hereinafter “Sandoval” Regarding claim 1 display controller the processor 11 functions as a display controller CCP_2 by executing the control program CP. [Matsumura para 0060] that displays content received by a communication device from outside The communication device 13 is a device that communicates with another device via a communication network, such as a mobile communication network or the Internet [Matsumura para 0053] by a plurality of display units, he user can cause the display surfaces 41S and 42S to face the user and set the display state of the display device of the information processing apparatus 100 to a second display state to perform display on both the display surfaces 41S and 42S, as shown in FIG. 1B [Matsumura para 0049] the display controller comprising: Matsumura does not teach but Sandoval teaches a notification unit configured to give notification related to the content to be displayed by the display units For example, the central office 103 may include a push notification server 105. The push notification server 105 may generate push notifications to deliver data and/or commands to the various premises 102 in the network (or more specifically, to the devices in the premises 102 that are configured to detect such notifications) [Sandoval para 0027] based on a first communication speed between the communication device and the outside and a second communication speed between the communication device and the outside required for displaying the content. a bit rate can be increased from greater than 5 or 7.5 Mbps (first speed) to greater than 8 or 12 Mbps (second speed) to deliver HD video at 1080p without errors. [Sandoval para 0051] increasing quality of received content from the intermediate threshold below an acceptable quality to above a quality threshold could be achieved by activating a second amplifier for a second communication path and changing a first amplifier to use one port for a first communication instead of two ports for respective first and second communication paths. [Sandoval para 0051] Matsumura discloses display states of a display device include a first display state and a second display state with a larger display area than the first display state. An information processing apparatus includes a display controller that controls the display device, an executer that executes at least one of a first App or a second App, and an acquirer that acquires a guide image. In response to the executer executing the first App when the display device is in the first display state, the acquirer acquires the guide image in accordance with a running state of the first App. The display controller causes the display device to display the guide image in the first display state. Sandoval discloses systems and methods are disclosed for optimizing resources while maintaining user experiences. Disclosed examples include an adaptive energy system whereby resource use can be optimized by influencing a communication path to utilize a subset of available resources in an efficient manner. Quality metrics are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Prior to the effective date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Matsumura and Sandoval in the art communicating between devices externally, as one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable as the combined teachings and technologies were well known in the art. Sandoval improves Matsumura’s systems, methods and/or apparatus by using quality metrics which are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Regarding claim 2 Matsumura teaches claim 1 in addition Matsumura teaches comprising: a display control unit configured to control the content displayed by the plurality of display units, wherein a notification matter of the notification unit is a matter of proposing display of the same content, and the display control unit performs control so that at least two or more of the plurality of display units display the same content when a user of the display units accepts the notification matter of the notification unit. the storage device 12 via the communication device 13, for example. In addition, the storage device 12 stores a guide image PG. The guide image PG is an image that prompts the user to switch the first display state to the second display state. [Matsumura para 0058] Regarding claim 10 Matsumura teaches a method of controlling a display controller the processor 11 functions as a display controller CCP_2 by executing the control program CP. [Matsumura para 0060] that displays content received by a communication device from outside The communication device 13 is a device that communicates with another device via a communication network, such as a mobile communication network or the Internet [Matsumura para 0053] by a plurality of display units, the user can cause the display surfaces 41S and 42S to face the user and set the display state of the display device of the information processing apparatus 100 to a second display state to perform display on both the display surfaces 41S and 42S, as shown in FIG. 1B [Matsumura para 0049] Matsumura does not teach but Sandoval teaches wherein notification related to the content to be displayed by the display units For example, the central office 103 may include a push notification server 105. The push notification server 105 may generate push notifications to deliver data and/or commands to the various premises 102 in the network (or more specifically, to the devices in the premises 102 that are configured to detect such notifications) [Sandoval para 0027] is given based on a first communication speed between the communication device and the outside and a second communication speed between the communication device and the outside required for displaying the content. a bit rate can be increased from greater than 5 or 7.5 Mbps (first speed) to greater than 8 or 12 Mbps (second speed) to deliver HD video at 1080p without errors. [Sandoval para 0051] increasing quality of received content from the intermediate threshold below an acceptable quality to above a quality threshold could be achieved by activating a second amplifier for a second communication path and changing a first amplifier to use one port for a first communication instead of two ports for respective first and second communication paths. [Sandoval para 0051] Matsumura discloses display states of a display device include a first display state and a second display state with a larger display area than the first display state. An information processing apparatus includes a display controller that controls the display device, an executer that executes at least one of a first App or a second App, and an acquirer that acquires a guide image. In response to the executer executing the first App when the display device is in the first display state, the acquirer acquires the guide image in accordance with a running state of the first App. The display controller causes the display device to display the guide image in the first display state. Sandoval discloses systems and methods are disclosed for optimizing resources while maintaining user experiences. Disclosed examples include an adaptive energy system whereby resource use can be optimized by influencing a communication path to utilize a subset of available resources in an efficient manner. Quality metrics are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Prior to the effective date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Matsumura and Sandoval in the art communicating between devices externally, as one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable as the combined teachings and technologies were well known in the art. Sandoval improves Matsumura’s systems, methods and/or apparatus by using quality metrics which are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Regarding claim 11 Matsumura teaches a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program that makes a processor of a display controller the processor 11 functions as a display controller CCP_2 by executing the control program CP. [Matsumura para 0060] that displays content received by a communication device from outside The communication device 13 is a device that communicates with another device via a communication network, such as a mobile communication network or the Internet [Matsumura para 0053] by a plurality of display units the user can cause the display surfaces 41S and 42S to face the user and set the display state of the display device of the information processing apparatus 100 to a second display state to perform display on both the display surfaces 41S and 42S, as shown in FIG. 1B [Matsumura para 0049] Matsumura does not teach but Sandoval teaches function as a notification unit configured to give notification related to the content to be displayed by the display units For example, the central office 103 may include a push notification server 105. The push notification server 105 may generate push notifications to deliver data and/or commands to the various premises 102 in the network (or more specifically, to the devices in the premises 102 that are configured to detect such notifications) [Sandoval para 0027]based on a first communication speed between the communication device and the outside and a second communication speed between the communication device and the outside required for displaying the content. a bit rate can be increased from greater than 5 or 7.5 Mbps (first speed) to greater than 8 or 12 Mbps (second speed) to deliver HD video at 1080p without errors. [Sandoval para 0051] increasing quality of received content from the intermediate threshold below an acceptable quality to above a quality threshold could be achieved by activating a second amplifier for a second communication path and changing a first amplifier to use one port for a first communication instead of two ports for respective first and second communication paths. [Sandoval para 0051] Matsumura discloses display states of a display device include a first display state and a second display state with a larger display area than the first display state. An information processing apparatus includes a display controller that controls the display device, an executer that executes at least one of a first App or a second App, and an acquirer that acquires a guide image. In response to the executer executing the first App when the display device is in the first display state, the acquirer acquires the guide image in accordance with a running state of the first App. The display controller causes the display device to display the guide image in the first display state. Sandoval discloses systems and methods are disclosed for optimizing resources while maintaining user experiences. Disclosed examples include an adaptive energy system whereby resource use can be optimized by influencing a communication path to utilize a subset of available resources in an efficient manner. Quality metrics are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Prior to the effective date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Matsumura and Sandoval in the art communicating between devices externally, as one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable as the combined teachings and technologies were well known in the art. Sandoval improves Matsumura’s systems, methods and/or apparatus by using quality metrics which are monitored such that optimization measures are implemented only if they do not negatively impact user experiences beyond a threshold. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J MICHAUD whose telephone number is (571)270-3981. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached on 571-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT J MICHAUD/Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12755705
LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE AND PIXEL THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754432
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING DIFFRACTION GRATINGS WITH REDUCED POLARIZATION SENSITIVITY
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751218
DIODE DEVICE WITH PROGRAMMABLE CONDUCTING CURRENT AND ARRAY PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745544
DISPLAY DEVICE WITH BALANCED LIGHT REFLEXIBILITY
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743164
OBTAINING WELLNESS INSIGHTS USING AN INPUT DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 621 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month