Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/304,228

HAND-HELD POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Priority
Feb 03, 2023 — continuation of 12/416,206
Examiner
LOPEZ, MICHELLE
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Black & Decker Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
927 granted / 1132 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1164
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1132 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the amendment filed on 07/13/26. Claims 1-3 and 5-18 are pending and have been examined. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 07/13/26 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of 12,416,206 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. The indicated allowability of claims 1 and 17 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Obermeier, Johnson, Ikuta and Wade. Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Obermeier et al. (7,096,974) in view of Johnson (9,434,013). Regarding claim 12, Obermeier discloses a hand-held power tool comprising: a motor housing (4); a motor (6) in the motor housing; a tool head (14) coupled to the motor and comprising a rotational axis, wherein the motor is positioned proximal to the tool head (note that motor 6 is positioned forward the handle and directly drives spindle 12, thereby is considered proximal to the tool head in comparison with other components such as the handle), and a handle (18) coupled to the motor housing and including a grip (Fig. 2). Obermeier discloses wherein the tool could be battery operated (col. 1, lines 6-15), but fails to disclose a battery foot configured to slidably engage a battery, wherein an axis of engagement of the battery foot and the rotational axis of the tool head subtend an angle greater than 0 degrees. Johnson teaches a power tool comprising a battery (18) removable received by the battery receiver (144) associated with a handle (Fig. 4), a tool head with an output axis (125), wherein an axis of engagement of the battery and the output axis (125) of the tool head subtend an angle (α) greater than 0 degrees. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the battery-operated power tool of Obermeier with the removable battery and battery receiver arrangement of Johnson in order to removably attach a power source to the tool facilitating replacement or recharging of the battery. Regarding claim 13, Johnson shows wherein the angle is 15 to 75 degrees. Claim(s) 14 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Obermeier et al. (7,096,974) in view of Johnson (9,434,013), as applied above to claim 12, and further in view of Webster (2006/0243469). Regarding claims 14 and 16, the modified invention of Obermeier discloses the hand-held power tool substantially as claimed, comprising a battery foot (144) as taught by Johnson, but fails to disclose a bridge coupled to the motor housing and the battery foot and a second handle. Webster discloses a hand-held power tool comprising a bridge (22; Fig. 1) with a second handle coupled to a motor housing and a battery foot (Fig. 1) for the purpose of providing additional gripping location for the user thereby improving control, stability and balance of the power tool during operation. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the modified invention of Obermeier with a bridge and a second handle as taught by Webster in order to provide improved control, stability and balance of the power tool during operation. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Obermeier et al. (7,096,974) in view of (9,434,013) and Webster (2006/0243469), as applied in claim 14, and further in view of Ikuta et al. (2023/0124236). Regarding claim 15, the modified invention of Obermeier discloses the hand-held power tool substantially as claimed comprising a motor housing and a bridge, as taught by Webster, but fails to disclose wherein the motor is positioned in the motor housing such that an axis of the bridge intersects the motor. Ikuta discloses a hand-held power tool comprising a motor (2) within a motor housing a bridge (not shown numerically; Fig. 1) such that an axis of the bridge intersects the motor (2) for the purposes of improving support of the motor mass and facilitating manipulation and positioning of the tool during operation. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the modified invention of Obermeier with the motor positioned in the motor housing such that an axis of the bridge intersects the motor, as taught by Ikuta, in order to improve support of the motor mass and facilitate manipulation and positioning of the tool during operation. Claim(s) 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Obermeier et al. (7,096,974) in view of Wade (5,564,353). Regarding claim 17, Obermeier discloses a hand-held power tool comprising: a motor housing (4); a motor (6) in the motor housing; a tool (16) coupled to the motor and comprising a rotational axis (W), wherein the motor is positioned proximal to the tool-head via spindle 12; and a first handle (18) coupled to the motor housing and including a grip, wherein the rotational axis (W) of the tool and an axis of the grip subtend to an acute angle (Fig. 2), but fails to disclose wherein the tool is an auger bit. Wade discloses a hand-held power tool comprising a motor housing (22) with a motor and an auger bit (16) comprising a rotational axis for the purposes of forming holes in the ground with a rotary hand-held power tool. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substituted Obermeier’s hand-held power tool with an auger for the drill because both constitute known rotary power tools that perform material removal operations through rotation about an output axis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 5-11 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record fails to teach or fairly suggest, either alone or in combination, the claimed arrangement of the motor wherein the majority of the motor is positioned between a center of mass of the hand-held power tool and the auger. Although individual references of record disclose certain aspects of the claimed power tool, the references do not disclose or render obvious the particular of the motor location between a center of mass of the power tool and the auger. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at (571) 270 - 1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE LOPEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 13, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746645
IMPACT TOOL
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734649
Electric Hand Tool with Torque Sensor and Certification System
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734650
IMPACTING RATCHET TOOL WITH MULTIPLE OPERATING MODES
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733928
TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY FOR DRIVING INSTRUMENT MOTION, AND RELATED DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721623
BONE STAPLE DELIVERY DEVICES, BONE STAPLES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 9m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1132 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month