Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/305,681

MUSHROOM VARIETY 'RO14176'

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Priority
Aug 20, 2024 — provisional 63/685,196 +1 more
Examiner
MCCORMICK EWOLDT, SUSAN BETH
Art Unit
1661
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Amycel, LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1046 granted / 1136 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 5m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
1138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1136 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA (America Invents Act). As a result, Applicant is encouraged to review the AIA in the MPEP. Applicant should also note that the wording, requirements, and statutes may have some subtle changes from actions and requirements prior to AIA . Continued Examination A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9 April 2026 has been entered. Claims Pending Claim 1 is pending. Claim 1 will be examined on the merits. Photographs The photographs, filed on 20 August 2025, have been approved. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 9 April 2026 has been considered. Objection to the Disclosure 37 CFR 1.163 The following is a quotation of section (a) of 37 CFR 1.163: (a) The specification must contain as full and complete a disclosure as possible of the plant and the characteristics thereof that distinguish the same over related known varieties, and its antecedents, and must particularly point out where and in what manner the variety of plant has been asexually reproduced. In the case of a newly found plant, the specification must particularly point out the location and character of the area where the plant was discovered. 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL- The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. In plant application filed under 35 U.S.C. 161, the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112 are limited. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. As specific to United States Plant Patent applications, the specifics of 37 CFR 1.164 (reproduced below) are controlling: The claim shall be in formal terms to the new and distinct variety of the specified plant as described and illustrated, and may also recite the principal distinguishing characteristics. More than one claim is not permitted. In plant applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 161, the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112 are limited. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 162: No plant patent shall be declared invalid for noncompliance with section 112 of this title if the description is as complete as is reasonably possible. The claim in the specification shall be in formal terms to the plant shown and described. The disclosure is objected to under 37 CFR 1.163 because the specification presents less than a full, clear and complete botanical description of the plant and the characteristics which define same per se and which distinguish the plant from related known cultivars and antecedents. More specifically: In the specification dated 3 February 2026, Table 1 should include a stand-alone description/legend of the contents of the Table. Applicant provided such a Table description/legend for Tables 2-16. It is noted that in [0022], Applicant states “In the description and tables that follow, numerous traits are calculated/measured as follows in Table 1”, however, Applicant should include a description/legend of the contents of Table 1. The specification is to provide as fully and completely a disclosure as possible of the claimed plant and the characteristics thereof to distinguish the claimed plant over related known varieties and its antecedents. The above listing may not be complete. Applicant should carefully review the disclosure and import into the disclosure any corrected or additional information which would aid in botanically identifying and/or distinguishing the cultivar for which United States Plant Patent protection is sought. If Applicant files a substitute specification and provided the requirements of 37 CFR 1.125(b) and (c) are met, a clean version of the substitute specification, a separate marked up version incorporating all additions, deletions and modifications relative to the previous version, and a statement that the substitute specification contains no new matter are required. Applicant should specifically authorize cancellation of the present specification to the same. Claim Rejection 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) and 112(b) Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and 112(b) as not being supported by a clear and complete botanical description of the plant for reasons set forth in the Objection to the Disclosure Section above. Summary No claim is allowed. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to SUSAN MCCORMICK EWOLDT whose telephone number is (571) 272-0981. The Examiner can normally be reached on M-TH 430-230. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Bratislav Stankovic can be reached on 571-270-0305. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUSAN MCCORMICK EWOLDT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent PP37476
Nelumbo plant named 'SCAU Star'
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent PP37296
GRAPEVINE PLANT NAMED ‘SUGRA69’
1y 1m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent PP37220
GRAPEVINE PLANT NAMED ‘SUGRA64'
11m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent PP37130
DIANTHUS PLANT NAMED 'HILPICPERF'
1y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent PP37141
CALIBRACHOA PLANT NAMED 'DOCALRAIPIPEPBE25'
9m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-6.4%)
1y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1136 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month