Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/306,329

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN INTEGRATED PLATFORM FOR SECURE PRODUCT LABELLING, VERIFICATION, AND ENFORCEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Examiner
MIKELS, MATTHEW
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Myori Services Sdn Bhd
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1044 granted / 1292 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1324
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1292 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-16 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 9-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu, et al. (WO 2017/116303, herein Liu) in view of Sharma, et al. (US 8,714,442, herein Sharma).1 Regarding claim 1, Liu teaches a method and system for providing an integrated platform for secure product labelling, verification, and enforcement, said method comprising the steps of: registering, via the integrated platform, a brand owner (paragraph 0028); providing a designated product produced by the brand owner for registration, (paragraph 0016) wherein the brand owner seeks protection for the designated product, the brand owner providing product certifications for the designated product during registration (paragraph 0022); checking, via regulatory bodies, to ensure the designated product has proper compliance (paragraph 0028); registering, via the integrated platform, the product (paragraph 0025); providing to the brand owner, via the integrated platform, a first label having an embedded NFC anti-counterfeiting feature (paragraph 0023) and a second label having a QR code (paragraph 0022); providing an online platform, via the integrated platform, to be used by at least one enforcement agency for monitoring activities of the designated product; and, for supporting a plurality of multi-agency collaboration activities (paragraph 0028); providing an application resource installed on a user device associated with a user (paragraph 0026), the application resource including a label scanner module for identifying authentic and/or counterfeit labels from the first label and/or the second label, wherein the application resource includes a reporting module for recording findings of counterfeit labels (paragraph 0028), and, a retailer module to allow the one or more retailers to receive and scan the designated product (paragraph 0028); sending product info to a user device corresponding to the first label applied to the product scanned by the label scanner module, and receiving a report from the user device (paragraph 0030); generating the second label associated with the first label applied to the product scanned by the retailer module (paragraph 0022); and sending product info to a user device corresponding to the second label, which is generated by the scanning of the first label by the retailer module, when the second label is scanned by the label scanner module, and receiving a report from the user device (paragraph 0029). Liu does not explicitly teach securing the first label and the second label onto the designated product prior to distribution of the designated product; and distributing the designated product to one or more retailers for sale. Sharma teaches securing the first label and the second label onto the designated product prior to distribution of the designated product (column 11, lines 52-60); and distributing the designated product to one or more retailers for sale (column 6, lines 24-35). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to combine the teachings of Liu and Sharma, because such a combination prevents counterfeiting, diversion and theft (column 1, lines 53-58 of Sharma). Regarding claims 2 and 10, Sharma further teaches capturing where and when the second label was scanned (column 11, lines 52-60). Regarding claim 3, Sharma further teaches the step of upgrading an existing Regulatory Label with a secure, encrypted label via the first label and/or the second label (column 16, lines 25-30). Regarding claims 4 and 11, Liu further teaches said method is configured to be used only on designated products that comply with the manufacturing standards and regulatory body requirements (paragraph 0028). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 and 13-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The cited art fails to disclose the additional features of the data authentication, NFC tag, and QR code as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW MIKELS whose telephone number is (571)270-5470. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 7:00 AM ET - 4:30 PM ET, Friday 7:00 AM ET - 11:00 AM ET, the Examiner is on central time.2 Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael G Lee can be reached at 571-272-2398. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW MIKELS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876 1 In addition to the cited portions in each reference, please see also the associated figures. 2 The Examiner can also be reached at matthew.mikels@uspto.gov.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597011
System and method to dynamically evaluate patterns in smart card operations
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591754
SMART CONNECTED FILM AND PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585908
VISUAL MARKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573272
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATM SESSION CACHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572767
Method for processing data from one- or two-dimensional code, and corresponding devices and program
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month