Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/307,478

INFLATOR HAVING AN OUTLET ROTATABLE RELATIVE TO A HANDLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Priority
Dec 16, 2020 — provisional 63/126,133 +1 more
Examiner
DOYLE, BENJAMIN C
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Black & Decker Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
198 granted / 291 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
312
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.3%
+43.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 291 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1 – 20 remain as originally filed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14, 17 – 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 9,707,580, “Mancl.” Regarding Claim 14: Mancl discloses a high-volume, low pressure inflator (As shown in at least Figure 1; The device of Mancl is capable of use as an inflator), comprising: a motor housing portion (Generally shown as bracket 42 in at least Figure 1); a battery receiving portion (As shown in at least Figure 1; The battery receiving portion is interpreted as the portion of the handle 26 shown accommodating the battery 12) configured to receive a battery (12) (As shown in at least Figure 1; At least Cl. 2, ln. 31 – 63); a handle (26) between the motor housing portion and the battery receiving portion (As shown in Figure 1); a fan housing portion (Generally shown as housing 25 which surrounds the fan wheel 22 as shown in at least Figure 1); a fan (22) in the fan housing portion, the fan configured to draw air in through the inlet and blow air out through the outlet (As shown in at least Figure 1); wherein the fan housing portion is generally cylindrical (As shown in at least Figure 1); wherein the inlet has a generally circular shaped cross-section (As shown in at least Figure 1), and wherein the outlet has a generally circular shaped cross-section (As shown in at least Figure 1). Regarding Claim 17: Mancl discloses the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 4; Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion has a larger outer diameter than the motor housing portion about the inlet axis (As shown in at least Figure 1; The bulbous portion of the housing is shown having a larger diameter, relative to the axis of rotation of the shaft, than the diameter of the housing portion of the motor). Regarding Claim 18: Mancl discloses the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 14; Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion includes the air outlet (As shown in at least Figure 1; The air outlet 56 is interpreted as forming a portion of the air outlet of the combined apparatus). Regarding Claim 19: Mancl discloses the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 18; Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion includes the air inlet (As shown in at least Figure 1; The fan housing 25 is shown forming the air inlet 54). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 – 13, 15, and 16, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,707,580, “Mancl,” in view of US 5,938,410, “Lee.” Regarding Claim 1: Mancl discloses a high-volume, low pressure inflator (As shown in at least Figure 1; The device of Mancl is capable of use as an inflator), comprising: a motor (10); a trigger (28) configured to activate the motor (Cl. 2, ln. 5); an inlet (54) having an inlet axis that is generally parallel or concentric with a longitudinal axis of the motor (As shown in Figure 1; The axis through the longitudinal axis of the inlet is shown as being generally parallel or concentric with the longitudinal ais of the motor as indicated by at least motor shaft 50); and a fan (22) configured to draw air in through the inlet and blow air out through the outlet (Cl. 2, ln. 21, “Fan wheel 22 connects directly to shaft 50 such that fan wheel 22 and rotor 34 rotate as a unit and thus rotate at the same high speed. Fan wheel 22 forces a current of air 52 from an air inlet 54 in housing 25, around bracket 42, and out through an air outlet 56 of housing 25.”); however, Mancl fails to explicitly disclose an outlet which is transverse to the inlet; wherein the position of the outlet is rotatable to a plurality of operable positions. Lee teaches a dust sucking and blowing device (Abstract; Figure 1; The device of Lee is capable of being used as an inflator) comprising a handle (12, 23), a motor (21), and an air outlet (5, 50, 50a, 51), and further teaches the outlet being flexibly directed such that the position of the outlet is rotatable to a plurality of operable positions (Cl. 3, ln. 54, “dust sucking/blowing tube 5 includes a tube body 50. A first end of the tube body 50 is formed with a fitting section 5a for fitting into the fitting hole 13 of the housing 1. A second end of the tube body 50 is formed with a connector section 5b for connecting with a head section 50a. The tube body 50 is flexible, whereby it can be extended into a working position in a curved state. The head section 50a can be a conic body or the like without limitation.”). The flexible nature of the outlet of Lee allows for the air outlet to be movable relative to the handle such that the flexible outlet is capable of being arranged such that the air outlet is placeable relative to the handle to a plurality of operable positions. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the outlet of Mancl to include the flexible outlet of Lee with the predicted results that such an outlet will be capable of providing an outlet flow and that such an outlet will be configurable to a working position in a curved state as taught by Lee. Once combined, the device of Mancl in view of Lee teaches an arrangement wherein the outlet is capable of being arranged such that it is transverse to the inlet and to a plurality of operable positions. Regarding Claim 2: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 1; once combined, Mancl in view of Lee further teaches wherein the outlet is rotatable about a rotation axis (Mancl Figure 1; The rotation axis is formed by the connection of the flexible tube of Lee onto the housing, at the outlet, of Mancl such that the connecting end of the flexible tube will remain static with, or swivel about, the outlet of Mancl as the outlet portion of the tube is configurable to a working position in a curved state as taught by Lee); and wherein the rotation axis is generally concentric or parallel to the longitudinal axis of the motor (Mancl Figure 1; The rotation axis is shown as extending in the longitudinal direction which is generally parallel or concentric with the longitudinal axis of the motor as indicated by at least motor shaft 50). Regarding Claim 3: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 2; once combined, Mancl further discloses comprising a handle (26), wherein the rotation axis is generally transverse to the handle (As shown in Mancl Figure 1; The longitudinal axis of the rotation axis of the motor, via shaft 50, is shown as generally left-right across the figure while the extension direction of the handle 26 is generally up-down across the figure such that the rotation axis of the motor shaft is interpreted as being generally transverse to the handle). Regarding Claim 4: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 3; once combined, Mancl further discloses wherein the inlet is generally transverse to the handle (As shown in Mancl Figure 1; The longitudinal axis of the inlet, at 54, and the motor are shown as generally left-right across the figure while the extension direction of the handle 26 is generally up-down across the figure such that the inlet is interpreted as being generally transverse to the handle). Regarding Claim 5: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 1; once combined, Mancl further discloses comprising a handle (26), wherein the inlet is generally transverse to the handle (As shown in Figure 1; The longitudinal axis of the inlet and the motor are shown as generally left-right across the figure while the extension direction of the handle 26 is generally up-down across the figure such that the inlet is interpreted as being generally transverse to the handle). Regarding Claim 6: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 1; once combined, Mancl further discloses wherein the motor is in a motor housing portion (Generally shown as bracket 42 in at least Figure 1) and the fan is in a fan housing portion (Generally shown as the bulbous portion of the housing 25 which surrounds the fan wheel 22 as shown in at least Figure 1), wherein the fan housing portion has a larger outer diameter than the motor housing portion about the inlet axis (As shown in at least Figure 1; The bulbous portion of the housing is shown having a larger diameter, relative to the axis of rotation of the shaft, than the diameter of the housing portion of the motor). Regarding Claim 7: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 1; once combined, Lee further teaches an attachment holder (5b) configured to hold an inflator attachment (50a) (As shown in at least Figure 2 and as described in at least Cl. 3, ln. 54 – 66). Regarding Claim 8: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 1; once combined, Mancl further discloses comprising a battery receiving portion (As shown in at least Figure 1; The battery receiving portion is interpreted as the portion of the handle 26 shown accommodating the battery 12) configured to receive a battery pack (As shown in at least Figure 1; At least Cl. 2, ln. 31 – 63). Regarding Claim 9: Mancl discloses a high-volume, low pressure inflator (As shown in at least Figure 1; The device of Mancl is capable of use as an inflator), comprising: a motor housing portion (Generally shown as bracket 42 in at least Figure 1); a battery receiving portion (As shown in at least Figure 1; The battery receiving portion is interpreted as the portion of the handle 26 shown accommodating the battery 12) configured to receive a battery (12) (As shown in at least Figure 1; At least Cl. 2, ln. 31 – 63); a handle (26) between the motor housing portion and the battery receiving portion (As shown in Figure 1); a fan housing portion (Generally shown as housing 25 which surrounds the fan wheel 22 as shown in at least Figure 1); a fan (22) in the fan housing portion, the fan configured to draw air in through the inlet and blow air out through the outlet (As shown in at least Figure 1); wherein the fan housing portion is generally cylindrical (As shown in at least Figure 1); however, Mancl fails to explicitly disclose wherein at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions. Lee teaches a dust sucking and blowing device (Abstract; Figure 1; The device of Lee is capable of being used as an inflator) comprising a handle (12, 23), a motor (21), and an air outlet (5, 50, 50a, 51), and further teaches the outlet being flexibly directed such that at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions (Cl. 3, ln. 54, “dust sucking/blowing tube 5 includes a tube body 50. A first end of the tube body 50 is formed with a fitting section 5a for fitting into the fitting hole 13 of the housing 1. A second end of the tube body 50 is formed with a connector section 5b for connecting with a head section 50a. The tube body 50 is flexible, whereby it can be extended into a working position in a curved state. The head section 50a can be a conic body or the like without limitation.”). The flexible nature of the outlet of Lee allows for the air outlet to be movable relative to the handle such that the flexible outlet is capable of being arranged such that the air outlet is placeable relative to the handle to a plurality of operable positions. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the outlet of Mancl to include the flexible outlet of Lee with the predicted results that such an outlet will be capable of providing an outlet flow and that such an outlet will be configurable to a working position in a curved state as taught by Lee. Once combined, the device of Mancl in view of Lee teaches an arrangement wherein the outlet is capable of being arranged such that at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions. Regarding Claim 10: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 9; once combined, Mancl in view of Lee, further teaches wherein the plurality of operable positions comprises at least four operable positions (The flexible nature of the outlet as provided by the combination allows for the outlet to be positioned in at least four distinct positions). Regarding Claim 11: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 9; once combined, Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion has a larger outer diameter than the motor housing portion about the inlet axis (As shown in at least Figure 1; The bulbous portion of the housing is shown having a larger diameter, relative to the axis of rotation of the shaft, than the diameter of the housing portion of the motor). Regarding Claim 12: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 9; once combined, Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion includes the air outlet (As shown in at least Figure 1; The air outlet 56 is interpreted as forming a portion of the air outlet of the combined apparatus). Regarding Claim 13: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 9; once combined, Mancl further discloses wherein the fan housing portion includes the air inlet (As shown in at least Figure 1; The fan housing 25 is shown forming the air inlet 54). Regarding Claim 15: Mancl discloses the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 14; however, Mancl fails to explicitly disclose wherein at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions. Lee teaches a dust sucking and blowing device (Abstract; Figure 1; The device of Lee is capable of being used as an inflator) comprising a handle (12, 23), a motor (21), and an air outlet (5, 50, 50a, 51), and further teaches the outlet being flexibly directed such that at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions (Cl. 3, ln. 54, “dust sucking/blowing tube 5 includes a tube body 50. A first end of the tube body 50 is formed with a fitting section 5a for fitting into the fitting hole 13 of the housing 1. A second end of the tube body 50 is formed with a connector section 5b for connecting with a head section 50a. The tube body 50 is flexible, whereby it can be extended into a working position in a curved state. The head section 50a can be a conic body or the like without limitation.”). The flexible nature of the outlet of Lee allows for the air outlet to be movable relative to the handle such that the flexible outlet is capable of being arranged such that the air outlet is placeable relative to the handle to a plurality of operable positions. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the outlet of Mancl to include the flexible outlet of Lee with the predicted results that such an outlet will be capable of providing an outlet flow and that such an outlet will be configurable to a working position in a curved state as taught by Lee. Once combined, the device of Mancl in view of Lee teaches an arrangement wherein the outlet is capable of being arranged such that at least one of the inlet and the outlet are rotatable to a plurality of operable positions. Regarding Claim 16: Mancl in view of Lee, teaches the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 15; once combined, Mancl in view of Lee, further teaches wherein the plurality of operable positions comprises at least four operable positions (The flexible nature of the outlet as provided by the combination allows for the outlet to be positioned in at least four distinct positions). Claim(s) 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9,707,580, “Mancl,” in view US 2018/0187687, “Yakubova.” Regarding Claim 7: Mancl discloses the high-volume, low pressure inflator of claim 14; however, Mancl fails to explicitly disclose or teach comprising an attachment holder configured to hold an inflator attachment. Mancl discloses an air outlet 56 which is interpreted as comprising an outlet which is usable as an inflator; however, Mancl fails to explicitly disclose the outlet being arranged to mate with an inflator attachment via an attachment holder. Yakubova teaches an inflator (As shown in at least Figures 1 – 9; [Abstract], “inflator tool includes a handle portion extending between a battery receiving portion and a tool head portion”), the inflator comprising an air inlet (106), an air outlet (80), a handle (22), a motor (14), and further comprising an attachment holder ([0027], “air outlet 80 includes at least one retention member for engaging an inflation adapter 150”) configured to hold an inflator attachment (150) (As shown in at least Figures 3, 4, and 7 – 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have incorporated an attachment holder with the air outlet of Mancl, as taught by Yakubova, with the predicted results that such an attachment holder will be capable of interfacing with a inflator attachment, as taught by Yakubova, such that various inflation nozzles can be utilized in a manner well known in the art (Yakubova, at least [0027] – [0028]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 3,099,386 – Inflation device with rotatable outlet Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN DOYLE whose telephone number is (571)270-5821. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 0900 - 1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Laurenzi can be reached at 571-270-7878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN DOYLE/Examiner, Art Unit 3746 2026.06.10
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12655841
Flow Distributor Assembly, Valve Box and Plunger Pump
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12644445
COMPRESSOR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR PORTABLE GAS SOURCE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641752
WATER BLOCK WITH AIR-COOLING MODULE AND MULTI-LAYER HEAT-CONDUCTING STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637928
MULTI VALVE CONTROL FOR PUMPS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12618812
FLUID MIXING BY FLUID SUPPLY LINES WITH LINE-SPECIFIC FLUID PUMPS FOR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY
5y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.0%)
2y 8m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 291 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month