Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/307,900

KIT FOR CREATING MINIATURE REPLICA OF A FOOD OR BEVERAGE ITEM

Final Rejection §101§DP
Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Examiner
BALDORI, JOSEPH B
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mga Entertainment Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
475 granted / 1064 resolved
-25.4% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1064 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 03/03/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of Application # 18/461,896, US Patent No’s 11,850,533; 11,992,786; 12,172,100; and 11,969,667 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of copending Application No. 18/899,254 (reference application). This is a provisional statutory double patenting rejection since the claims directed to the same invention have not in fact been patented. The claims in these cases appear to be identical. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/03/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. It is noted that the terminal disclaimer filed overcomes the non-statutory double patenting rejections of the previous action. However, applicant has not amended or cancelled the claims of the ‘254 application, noted above. It is noted that a terminal disclaimer alone will not overcome this rejection as the claims of this application are identical to the claims of the present application and this is, therefore, a provisional statutory double patenting rejection. A statutory double patenting rejection, even provisional, requires cancellation or significant amendments to the copending claims. Further, even if amended, a nonstatutory double patenting rejection may then still apply. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH B BALDORI whose telephone number is (571)270-7424. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am to 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH B BALDORI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Mar 03, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599816
Golf Ball Dispenser With Embedded Display Device, Separate Front Waterfall Panel and/or Blower Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582883
GOLF FLAG POLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569748
HAND-FORMING CARD SHUFFLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569735
DAMPENERS FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENT AND SPORTING EQUIPMENT INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551812
AIR DRIVEN TOY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+30.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1064 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month