Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/308,812

SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR DEVICE LOCATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 25, 2025
Priority
Nov 02, 2021 — continuation of 12/425,673
Examiner
MONSHI, SAMIRA
Art Unit
2422
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
406 granted / 509 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
527
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-24 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 4-7, 12, 16 and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because independent the limitations of claim 1 7 and 19 of the current application are included in claims 1, 8 and 17of the U.S. Patent No. 12425673 with obvious wording variations. As an example, claim 1 of the current application are compared with claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 in the following table: Claim 1 of the current application Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a control device, an instruction; activating, based on the instruction, a function of the control device; detecting, by a sensor of the control device, a response to a result of the function, wherein the response to the result of the function is used to determine a location of the control device; and causing, based on detecting the response to the result of the function, the determination of the location of the control device. . 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a control device, an instruction to determine location information associated with the control device; activating, based on the instruction, a function of the control device; detecting, by a sensor of the control device, a response to a result of the function, wherein the response to the result of the function is used to determine the location information for the control device; determining, by the control device and based on the response to the result of the function, a sensing signature; determining, based on the sensing signature, the location information; and causing output of an indication of the location information. As disclosed above, claim 1 of the current application is broader version of claim 1 (also claims 8 and 17) of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 with obvious wording variations. For similar reasons disclosed above, independent claims 7 and 19 of the current application is broader version of independent claims 1, 8 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 with obvious wording variations. Claims 7, 16 and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 further includes the limitations of claims 2, 8, 14 and 20 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 further includes the limitations of claims 3, 9, 15 and 21 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 further includes the limitations of claims 4, 10, 16 and 22 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 further includes the limitations of claims 5, 11, 17 and 23 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Claims 2 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 12425673 further includes the limitations of claims 6, 12, 18 and 24 of the current application with obvious wording variations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMIRA MONSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-0995. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM-5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John W Miller can be reached at 5712727353. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMIRA MONSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2422
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767049
FULL DISPLAY SYSTEM WITH INTERPOSED CONTROLLER FOR MULTIPLE CAMERAS
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771900
METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR CAMERA FUNCTION PAGE SWITCHING
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771899
EVENT LIVE-STREAMING METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771884
METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR LIVE STREAM PLAYBACK GENERATION
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761457
SUBPIXEL LINE SCANNING
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 3m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month