Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/308,832

SLIDE OUT CHILD VEHICLE SEAT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 25, 2025
Examiner
GABLER, PHILIP F
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
900 granted / 1228 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1281
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1228 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I and Species Group VIII in the reply filed on 30 December 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 8-30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention and/or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 30 December 2025. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS documents submitted 25 August 2025 appear to include copies of “Notice[s] of References Cited” from US Patent Application Number 18/463838 to which this application claims priority. Note that while references cited on these documents have been considered as indicated on the attached PTO-892 Notice of References Cited, the submittal of these forms by Applicant does not constitute a proper information disclosure statement. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the second positioning element offset from the first positioning element in a first direction and a second, opposite direction must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). The drawings directed to the elected embodiment (i.e. Figures 9) show three positions of the device but do not show the offset in opposite directions as claimed. That is, if Figure 9A shows a travel position and Figure 9B shows a first loading position, Figure 9C may show a different offset of the positioning elements (slid outwardly after rotation), but it is not in an opposite direction. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jung et al. (US Patent Number 10640020). Regarding claim 1, Jung discloses a child restraint system for installation in a vehicle, the child restraint system comprising: a support base (10) removably mountable to a vehicle seat of the vehicle (via 11; see at least Figure 5), the support base comprising: a first positioning element (32; optionally including 40); a second positioning element (31) configured to receive a child seat (seat frame 20 is mounted to 31), the second positioning element being movably connected to the first positioning element (31 at least rotates relative to 32 and slides relative to 40) and being movable relative to the first positioning element between a travel position, a first loading position, and a second loading position (see Figure 12 for instance showing a travel position with first and second loading positions in phantom; note that Figures 9 and 10 also show a travel position and first loading position, respectively, while a second loading position with the seat rotated 180o from the position of Figure 10 is possible; see at least lines 12-29 of column 7); and wherein in the travel position, the second positioning element is aligned with the first positioning element (for instance, lateral axes of the elements are aligned), in the first loading position, the second positioning element is offset from the first positioning element in a first direction (the lateral axes rotated relative to one another), and in the second loading position, the second positioning element is offset from the first positioning element in an opposite, second direction (the axes rotated in the opposite direction; see Figures 9, 10, and 12 as explained above). Regarding claim 2, Jung further discloses the support base has a base axis extending between a front end and a rear end of the support base, and the second positioning element has a primary axis extending between the front end and the rear end of the second positioning element, the base axis and the primary axis being coaxial in the travel position (this is the general arrangement; see Figures 9 and/or 12). Regarding claim 3, Jung further discloses the support base has a base axis extending between a front end and a rear end of the support base, in the first loading position, the second positioning element is offset from the base axis in the first direction and in the second loading position, the second positioning element is offset from the base axis in the second direction (again, see at least Figure 12). Regarding claim 4, Jung further discloses the support base has a base axis extending between a front end and a rear end of the support base, wherein in the first loading position and the second loading position, the second positioning element is offset from the first positioning element along a travel axis, the travel axis being arranged at a non-parallel angle relative to the base axis (again, see at least Figure 12). Regarding claim 5, Jung further discloses the travel axis is perpendicular to the base axis (at least as in Figure 10 and an opposite second loading position). Regarding claims 6 and 7, Jung further discloses the first positioning element is fixed and/or rotatable relative to the base axis (at least member 32 is fixed to the base axis while member 40 is rotatable). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure because it shows a range of related restraint systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP F GABLER whose telephone number is (571)272-2155. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP F GABLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600270
CARRYCOT TO BE DETACHABLY MOUNTED ON A BASE BEING DISMOUNTABLY ATTACHED IN A VEHICLE OR ON A STROLLER FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600272
CHILD RESTRAINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589678
CHILD SAFETY SEAT AND RELATED TETHER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12559001
SHOULDER STRAP WIDTH ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM AND CHILD SAFETY SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559003
CHILD SAFETY SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+23.7%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1228 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month