Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/309,868

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND CONTROL PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §101§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Aug 26, 2025
Priority
Aug 12, 2013 — JP 2013-167308 +6 more
Examiner
BERHAN, AHMED A
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NIKON Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
973 granted / 1111 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1111 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim [1] is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim [1] of prior U.S. Patent No. 12, 425, 708. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Below is the table showing the conflicting claims US. 19/309,868 US. PAT. No. 12, 425, 708 An imaging sensor comprising: a first chip including: a first photoelectric converter that converts light into charge; a second photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the first photoelectric converter in a first direction and converts light into charge; a third photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the first photoelectric converter in a second direction crossing the first direction and converts light into charge; and a fourth photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the third photoelectric converter in the first direction and adjacent to the second photoelectric converter in the second direction and converts light into charge; and a second chip stacked with the first chip and including a drive unit that controls to be different: a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the first photoelectric converter ends; a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the second photoelectric converter ends; a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the third photoelectric converter ends; and a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the fourth photoelectric converter ends. An imaging sensor comprising: a first chip including: a first photoelectric converter that converts light into charge; a second photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the first photoelectric converter in a first direction and converts light into charge; a third photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the first photoelectric converter in a second direction crossing the first direction and converts light into charge; and a fourth photoelectric converter that is disposed adjacent to the third photoelectric converter in the first direction and adjacent to the second photoelectric converter in the second direction and converts light into charge; and a second chip stacked with the first chip and including a drive unit that controls to be different: a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the first photoelectric converter ends; a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the second photoelectric converter ends; a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the third photoelectric converter ends; and a timing in which accumulation of the charge obtained from conversion by the fourth photoelectric converter ends. Conclusion . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED A BERHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5094. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00Am-5:00pm (MAX- Flex). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED A BERHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756917
CAMERA MODULE
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756939
Automatic Continuous Flash Lighting for Close Range Image Capture
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756947
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750598
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750575
CAMERA MODULE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 3m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1111 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month