Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/311,272

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING SEARCH PATH

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Aug 27, 2025
Priority
Sep 24, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0128599
Examiner
NGUYEN, THU N
Art Unit
2154
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ascent Korea Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
422 granted / 588 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 588 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This responds to Applicant’s Arguments/Remarks filed 06/26/2026. Claims 1, 5, 13-14 have been amended. Claims 3 and 11 have been cancelled. Claims 1-2, 4-10, 12-14 are now pending in this Application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 Applicant’s amendment filed on 2/26/2026 has been fully considered. However, the amendment does not overcome the rejection under 35 USC § 101, and the rejection is therefore maintained. As amended, claim 1 remains directed to “transferring search keywords, search data, and generating the base search path on the search keyword, then transferring the base search path from server to the terminal through the network” the additional limitations which do not integrate the judicial exception into the practical application. Rather, these limitations amount to insignificant extra solution activity, instructions to apply the abstract idea using generic computer components and conventional computer function. Although the claim recites “displaying a first search path including keywords, displaying a result of clustering the keywords in the first search path, displaying classification collection of the keyword, displaying identifiers corresponding to the keywords classification collection, displaying on a left side of a screen, a filter object for selecting a keyword, displaying an identifier corresponding to the search volume variation information in the first search path, displaying a function for setting the identifier through a search volume fluctuation rate between a pastime point and a predetermined time based on the point in time… displaying, in a first area of a screen, a state of the first search path at a first time point included in the comparison time point, displaying in a second area of the screen a state of the first search path at a second time point that precedes the first time point” the claim does not recite any result achieved by the comparison . Specifically, the claim does not require using the comparison to control a device, modify data, generate a decision or otherwise improve computer functionality. Rather, the comparison is merely displayed to a user as information, which constitutes insignificant extra-solution activity and does not integrate the judicial exception into a practical application. Accordingly, the examiner respectfully maintained the rejection. Claims rejection There is no prior art to reject claims 1-2, 4-10, 12-14. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THU N NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1765. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boris Gorney can be reached at 571-272-5626. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. July 20, 2026 /THU N NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2154
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jun 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699560
VIRTUALIZED FILE SERVER
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12682059
METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC STORING OF MALICIOUS SAMPLES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12657222
PROCESSING DATA PORTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SELECTABLE SEARCH ALGORITHM EXECUTION
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657167
SYSTEM TO SUPPORT NATIVE STORAGE OF A CONTAINER IMAGE ON A HOST OPERATING SYSTEM FOR A CONTAINER RUNNING IN A VIRTUAL MACHINE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645730
GENERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF GEOSPATIAL WORKFLOWS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 9m (~2y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 588 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month