Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/312,377

SIGNAL GENERATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 28, 2025
Priority
Apr 17, 2023 — provisional 63/496,433 +1 more
Examiner
AZIZ, ADNAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Dedrone Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
437 granted / 570 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 570 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to application filed on August 28, 2025. Claims 1-20 are currently pending in the application. Continuity/Priority Information This application is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 18/441,120, filed on February 14, 2024 (now U.S. Patent No. 12,417,709), which claims the benefit of, and priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/496,433, filed on April 17, 2023. Drawings The drawings filed on August 28, 2025, are acknowledged and are acceptable. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent Number 12417709. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they recite the same invention using the same means with little additional change to the claim language. Patent claims are narrower and thus teach all the limitations of instant claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if they overcome the nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejections set forth in this office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose the combination of limitations presented in the claimed invention. Like the explanation of reasons for allowance in the parent (PAT 12417709), the closest prior art of Lin et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2020/0103931A1; hereinafter “Lin”) and Sun (Chinese Publication No. CN101247162B), either alone or in combination, does not expressly teach all the limitations as recited in independent claims 1 and 11. Specifically, neither Lin nor Sun, alone or in combination, discloses or suggests the claimed arrangement in which a plurality of signal expansion circuits generate a plurality of additional frequencies based on the reference clock and merge those additional frequencies with an input frequency to produce a merged signal for transmission by the antenna. Lin is directed primarily to electronic clock adjustment/transmission system (see e.g., para. [0027]-[0030]), while Sun concerns analog intermediate-frequency distribution, signal branching, frequency conversion, and antenna transmission (see e.g., para. [0017], [0021]-[0022], [0041], [0046]). Although Sun discloses an expansion module, a reference clock, and an antenna, neither Lin nor Sun teaches the claimed frequency-generation and frequency-merging functionality, as required by independent claim 1 and corresponding method claim 11. For the reasons above claims 1 and 11 are allowable. Claims 2-10 and 12-20 depend, directly or indirectly, from allowable claims 1 and 11 and are therefore indicated as allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and are cited in the attached PTO-892, Notice of References Cited form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADNAN AZIZ whose telephone number is (571) 270-7536, (Fax: 571-270-8536). The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (9am - 6pm Eastern Time). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, QUAN-ZHEN WANG can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADNAN AZIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 adnan.aziz@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739646
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING REMOTE CONTROL UNITS AND PAIRED DEVICES
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722645
BEHAVIOR ESTIMATION DEVICE AND BEHAVIOR ESTIMATION METHOD FOR SADDLE-TYPE VEHICLE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718682
Vapor displacement refueling including data communications, zero gravity and chemical looping combustion system
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12697938
VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, VEHICLE CONTROL PROGRAM, AND POSITION CONFIRMATION DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690626
TERMINAL DEVICE, INHALATION DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.1%)
2y 1m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 570 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month