Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/322,587

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUDIO MEDICAL INSTRUMENT PATIENT MEASUREMENTS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Priority
Mar 06, 2018 — divisional of 11/348,688 +2 more
Examiner
PHAM, TOAN NGOC
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Advinow Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
997 granted / 1153 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1175
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1153 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-7 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent No. 11,935,656. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they both claimed the same subject matter. See mapping below. U.S. Pat. Application No. 19/322,587 U.S. Pat. No. 11,935,656 1. A medical data system for generating patient treatment instructions, the system comprising: an automated diagnostic and treatment system utilizing machine learning that processes patient information and calculates treatment plans associated with illnesses that have been identified from a set of potential illnesses based on patient information and diagnostic data, the automated diagnostic and treatment system having an input that receives patient information and the diagnostic data from at least one of a patient, medical staff, doctor, a medical history database and automated system; wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system further generates at least one treatment option related to at least one illness within the set of potential illnesses; a doctor interface station coupled to the automated diagnostic and treatment system, the doctor interface station provides a doctor the at least one treatment option and the at least one illness; and a database storing electronic health care records, the database being updated based on the at least one illness and the at least one treatment option, the updated health care record being automatically updated in a preferred electronic health care record format. 1. A medical data system for generating patient treatment instructions, the system comprising: an automated diagnostic and treatment system utilizing machine learning that processes patient information and calculates treatment plans associated with illnesses that have been identified from a set of potential illnesses based on patient information and diagnostic data, the automated diagnostic and treatment system having an input that receives patient information and the diagnostic data from at least one of a patient, medical staff, doctor, a medical history database and automated system; wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system further generates at least one treatment option based on the set of potential illnesses, the diagnostic data and the patient information; a doctor interface station coupled to the automated diagnostic and treatment system via a cloud-based interface, the doctor interface station provides a doctor the calculated treatment plans and associated illnesses, the doctor interface station further providing an interface that allows a doctor to select a potential illness within the set of potential illnesses and a treatment option within the at least one treatment option; and a database storing electronic health care records, the database being automatically updated based on the doctor-selected potential illness and doctor-selected treatment, the updated health care record being automatically updated in a preferred electronic health care record format. 2. The medical data system according to claim 1, wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system suggests a level of exam to the doctor based on the set of potential illnesses. 2. The medical data system according to claim 1, wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system suggests a level of exam to the doctor based on the set of potential illnesses. 3. The medical data system according to claim 1, wherein a cloud-based database stores the automatically updated electronic health care record. 3. The medical data system according to claim 1, wherein a cloud-based database stores the automatically updated electronic health care record. 4. The medical data system according to claim 3, wherein the updated electronic health record comprises an updated treatment code. 4. The medical data system according to claim 3, wherein the updated electronic health record comprises an updated treatment code. 5. The medical data system according to claim 1 wherein at least one trust score is generated with at least one potential illness within the set of potential illnesses. 5. The medical data system according to claim 11 wherein at least one trust score is generated with at least one potential illness within the set of potential illnesses. 6. The medical data system of claim 1 wherein at least one of a prescription and lab test request are automatically generated based one or more of the at least one illness and the at least one treatment option. 6. The medical data system of claim 1 wherein at least one of a prescription and lab test request are automatically generated based on the selected potential illness, patient information and diagnostic data. 7. The medical data system according to claim 1 wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system receives diagnostic data from an automated medical instrument used by a patient and guided by a visual computer system. 7. The medical data system according to claim 1 wherein the automated diagnostic and treatment system receives diagnostic data from an automated medical instrument used by a patient and guided by a visual computer system. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -Patel (US 2022/0044802) discloses a system for remote medical care. -Avendi et al. (US 2019/0355149) discloses a system for navigation to a target anatomical object in medical imaging-based procedures. -Reed et al. (US 2014/0164022) discloses a patient direct healthcare system. -Robertson (US 2011/0144451) discloses a system for providing remote healthcare services. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN NGOC PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-2967. The examiner can normally be reached M - F (7 AM - 3:30 PM). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at (571) 272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN N PHAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 9/18/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761190
QCM APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761733
Vibration Motor
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759573
COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749386
DETECTING FALLS USING A MOBILE DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736374
CYLINDER SENSOR ASSEMBLY
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.2%)
1y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month