Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/324,682

INCIDENT SURVEILLANCE USING UNMANNED MOBILE MACHINES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Priority
Mar 10, 2023 — continuation of 12/444,198
Examiner
DANG, HUNG Q
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 12m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
1291 granted / 1891 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
1976
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1891 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-14 and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 12,444,198 (hereinafter reference patent). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they are obvious variants of each other. Current Application Reference Patent 1. An apparatus for operating an Unmanned Mobile Machine ("UMM") to perform incident surveillance, comprising: a memory; and one or more processors communicatively coupled with the memory, wherein the one or more processors are configured to: obtain, from a UMM capturing video of a potential incident, an indication of a charge level of a battery of the UMM; determine, based at least in part on the charge level, whether to dispatch a second UMM to a location associated with the UMM; transmit, based on determining to dispatch the second UMM, a command to the second UMM to travel to the location associated with the UMM; and based on arrival of the second UMM to the location, transmit, to the UMM, a retreat command to retreat to a launching cradle for charging. 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to transmit, based on determining to dispatch the second UMM, a second command to capture video of the potential incident. 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to select the second UMM based at least in part on a second charge level of the second UMM. 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive, from the second UMM located at the location, information regarding the potential incident including an interaction of the second UMM at the location. 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive the information as a video or audio recorded by an input device of the second UMM at the location. 6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive the information as an action indication of an action taken by the second UMM in an attempt to rectify the potential incident. 7. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to command, based on the information regarding the potential incident, the second UMM to track a subject identified in the information. 8. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are configured to transmit the command including transmitting multiple commands to each of multiple UMMs, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive the information as multiple information from each of the multiple UMMs located at the location. 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive an incident clearing indication that the potential incident is cleared; and transmit, to the second UMM and based on receiving the incident clearing indication, a retreat command related to leaving the location. 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive an indication of the potential incident from the UMM. 11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to separately perform tracking of the UMM using radar or frequency. 12. An apparatus for surveilling a potential incident, comprising: a memory; one or more processors communicatively coupled with the memory; a camera; and a navigation, drive, and flight (NDF) system configured to travel to locations associated with an arca, wherein the one or more processors are configured to: perform, via the camera, an interaction related to a potential incident at a location to acquire information regarding the potential incident; transmit the information regarding the potential incident; and retreat, via the NDF system, to a launching cradle during the interaction related to the potential incident and based on arrival of a second Unmanned Mobile Machine (UMM) at the location. 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are configured to retreat, via the NDF system, to the launching cradle based on receiving a retreat command related to leaving the location. 14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are configured to transmit the information as video from the camera recorded at the location associated with the potential incident. 15. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are configured to transmit the information as an action indication of an action taken by the apparatus in an attempt to rectify the potential incident. 16. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to track a subject at the location of the potential incident based on a received command. 17. A computer-implemented method for operating an Unmanned Mobile Machine ("UMM") to perform incident surveillance, comprising: obtaining, from a UMM capturing video of a potential incident, an indication of a charge level of a battery of the UMM; determining, based at least in part on the charge level, whether to dispatch a second UMM to a location associated with the UMM; transmitting, based on determining to dispatch the second UMM, a command to the second UMM to travel to the location associated with the UMM; and based on arrival of the second UMM to the location, transmitting, to the UMM, a retreat command to retreat to a launching cradle for charging. 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, further comprising transmitting, based on determining to dispatch the second UMM, a second command to capture video of the potential incident. 19. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, further comprising selecting the second UMM based at least in part on a second charge level of the second UMM. 20. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, further comprising receiving, from the second UMM located at the location, information regarding the potential incident including an interaction of the second UMM at the location. 1. An apparatus for operating an Unmanned Mobile Machine (“UMM”) to perform incident surveillance, comprising: a memory; and a processor communicatively coupled with the memory, wherein the processor is configured to: receive an indication of a potential incident within an area associated with a building; transmit a command to the UMM to travel to a location associated with the potential incident and capture video of the potential incident; receive, from the UMM located at the location, information regarding the potential incident including an interaction of the UMM at the location; obtain, from the UMM at the location, a charge indication of a charge level; transmit, based at least in part on the charge level, a second command to a second UMM to travel to the location associated with the potential incident and capture video of the potential incident; based on arrival of the second UMM to the location, transmit, to the UMM, a retreat command to retreat to a launching cradle for charging; and receive, from the second UMM located at the location, second information regarding the potential incident including a second interaction of the second UMM at the location. See claim 1 of reference patent above. 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to select the second UMM based at least in part on a second charge level of the second UMM. See claim 1 of reference patent above. 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to receive the information as a video or audio recorded by an input device of the UMM at the location. 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to receive the information as an action indication of an action taken by the UMM in an attempt to rectify the potential incident. 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to command, based on the information regarding the potential incident, the UMM to track a subject identified in the information. 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to transmit the command including transmitting multiple commands to each of multiple UMMs, and wherein the processor is configured to receive the information as multiple information from each of the multiple UMMs located at the location. 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to: receive an incident clearing indication that the potential incident is cleared; and transmit, to the second UMM and based on receiving the incident clearing indication, a retreat command related to leaving the location. 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to receive the indication of the potential incident from the UMM. 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to separately perform tracking of the UMM using radar or frequency. 10. An apparatus for surveilling a potential incident, comprising: a memory; a processor communicatively coupled with the memory; a camera; and a navigation, drive, and flight (NDF) system configured to travel to locations associated with a building, wherein the processor is configured to: receive, from a building management system, a command to travel to a location associated with a potential incident; travel, via the NDF system, to the location associated with the potential incident; perform, via the camera, an interaction related to the potential incident to acquire information regarding the potential incident; transmit, to the building management system, the information regarding the potential incident; and retreat to a launching cradle based on receiving, from the building management system, based on arrival of a second Unmanned Mobile Machine (UMM) at the location, and during the interaction related to the potential incident, a retreat command related to leaving the location. See claim 10 of reference patent above. 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the processor is configured to transmit the information as video from the camera recorded at the location associated with the potential incident. 12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the processor is configured to transmit the information as an action indication of an action taken by the apparatus in an attempt to rectify the potential incident. 13. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to cause the apparatus to track a subject at the location of the potential incident based on a command received from the building management system. 14. A computer-implemented method for operating an Unmanned Mobile Machine (“UMM”) to perform incident surveillance, comprising: receiving, by a building management system, an indication of a potential incident within an area associated with a building; transmitting, by the building management system, a command to the UMM to travel to a location associated with the potential incident and capture video of the potential incident; receiving, from the UMM located at the location, information regarding the potential incident including an interaction of the UMM at the location; obtaining, from the UMM at the location, a charge indication of a charge level; transmitting, based at least in part on the charge level, a second command to a second UMM to travel to the location associated with the potential incident and capture video of the potential incident; based on arrival of the second UMM to the location, transmitting, to the UMM, a retreat command to retreat to a launching cradle for charging; and receiving, from the second UMM located at the location, second information regarding the potential incident including a second interaction of the second UMM at the location. See claim 14 of reference patent above. 18. The computer-implemented method of claim 14, further comprising selecting the second UMM based at least in part on a second charge level of the second UMM. See claim 14 of reference patent above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG Q DANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1116. The examiner can normally be reached IFT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Q Tran can be reached at 571-272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG Q DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750560
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CONTENT DESCRIPTION
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748461
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING BENDABLE AREA
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739349
SYSTEM FOR A CARE AREA, IN PARTICULAR A FITNESS STUDIO
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734945
Golf cart armrest
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733143
Nested RF Shield System for a Tuner Circuit
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month