Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/324,971

IMAGE COMPENSATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Priority
Jan 10, 2025 — CN 202510045134.3
Examiner
TZENG, FRED
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Glenfly Tech Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 776 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-13 are present for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over An et al (US 2017/0162103), hereinafter as An, in view of Lee et al (US 2017/0032743), hereinafter as Lee. RE claims 1 and 13, An discloses the invention substantially as claimed. An discloses that an image compensation apparatus and its usage method (see figure 1 and sections [0027], [0028], [0029]; i.e., the display controller 120 is the image compensation apparatus), comprising: an obtaining module, configured to obtain a to-be-processed image, wherein the to-be-processed image carries accumulated stress values of each pixel (see figure 1 and sections [0027], [0028], [0029]; i.e., the display controller 120 to obtain a to-be-processed image, the accumulation block 130 included in the display controller 120 to calculate and accumulate stress values of each pixel of the to-be-processed image, the calculated and accumulated stress data of each pixel being stored in the nonvolatile memory 140); a decay determination module, configured to obtain luminance decay degree values of each pixel based on the accumulated stress values (see figure 3 and sections [0028], [0029]; i.e., the accumulation block 130 to calculate the stress data of each pixel, not only based on the image data RGB, but also based on a luminance of the pixel may be decreased); and a compensation module, configured to calculate a compensation factor for each pixel based on the luminance decay degree values of each pixel, and compensates each pixel according to the compensation factor (see figure 1 and sections [0028], [0029]; i.e., the display controller 120 to determine a compensation factor COMPF for the degradation compensation of the OLED display device 150, based on the calculated/accumulated stress data for each pixel degraded, and a luminance of the pixel may be decreased). However, An does not specifically disclose that each pixel in different channels. Lee teaches that an organic light emitting display device including pixels with driving transistors, and a storage unit storing a compensation value corresponding at least partially to a channel length modulation of the driving transistors, and accumulation stress information stored in the data accumulating unit corresponding to a pixel (see sections [0010], [0020]). The motivation of Lee is for compensating for degradation of OLED may take into account channel length modulation of driving transistor (see section [0009]). An and Lee are combinable because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify An by including the teaching from Lee in order for compensating for degradation of OLED may take into account channel length modulation of driving transistor. RE claim 14, An in view of Lee disclose that wherein memory stores a computer program therein, and the processor, when executing the computer program, performs steps of the image compensation method according to claim 1 (see An, figure 1 and sections [0028], [0029]; i.e., nonvolatile memory 140 and processor 110). RE claim 15, An in view of Lee disclose that wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform steps of the image compensation method according to claim 1 (see An, figure 1 and sections [0028], [0029]; i.e., processor 110). RE claim 16, An in view of Lee disclose that wherein the computer program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform steps of the image compensation method according to claim 1 (see An, figure 1 and sections [0028], [0029]; i.e., processor 110). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhang et al (USPN 10,163,388) Nathan et al (US 2014/0111,567) Xu et al (USPN 10,497,300) Han et al (USPN 11,587,503) Any inquiry concerning this communication from the examiner should be directed to whose telephone number is 571-272-7565. The examiner can normally be reached on weekdays from 2:0 pm to 10:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached on 571-272-0666. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications and 571-273-7565 for After Final communications. Informal regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docs for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000 (IN USA). /FRED TZENG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625 FFT July 22, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706035
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY HAVING PHOTODIODES
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700356
SENSING TIME FOR IMAGE RETENTION COMPENSATION IN OLED DISPLAYS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12688871
USE OF COMMON HEAD SLIDER FOR DIFFERENT RPM HARD DISK DRIVES
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687747
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682861
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 6m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month