Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/326,621

METHOD OF REMOVING NOISE AND TOUCH DETECTION DEVICE PERFORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103§Other
Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Priority
Oct 02, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0133508
Examiner
KETEMA, BENYAM
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
G2Touch Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
405 granted / 616 resolved
+3.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
634
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.9%
+22.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-9 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/04/2026 was filed and the submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR 10-2024-0133508, filed on October 2, 2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kremin et al (PG Pub NO 2016/0148034) in view of Lee (PG Pub NO2017/0097703) 2016/0054846. As in claim 1, Kremin et al discloses a touch detection device (Fig 1 and Par 0034) configured to perform a method of removing noise (Par 0100), the touch detection device (Fig 1 and Par 0034) comprising: a panel comprising a plurality of electrodes regularly arranged in a plurality of rows and columns; (Fig 1) discloses touch panel comprising a plurality of electrodes regularly arranged a multiplexer configured to be connected to electrodes corresponding to a plurality of rows for each column through a plurality of data lines; (Fig 1 item 112 and Par 0053) discloses The TX electrodes are driven with TX drive signals that are applied to the TX electrodes by a TX multiplexer and a sensor driver configured to detect touch input applied to a specific row through a sensing voltage in a state in which a ground potential or a driving voltage having a waveform of a specific cycle is applied to rows adjacent to the specific row, [0035] Measurements and measurement signals may be obtained from a capacitive sensor array in scan operations. A scan operation is performed in “multi-phase” mode when, during a given drive and/or sense period (e.g., slot) of the scan operation, multiple electrodes of the capacitive sensor array are driven and/or sensed concurrently (e.g., based on signals that differ in phase and/or polarity from each other). Multi-phase TX (MPTX) sensing is one example of a multi-phase scan mode….. multiple TX electrodes of a capacitive sensor array may be driven by corresponding multiple signals that have substantially the same magnitude (e.g., voltage, current, etc.) but have opposing polarities (e.g., such as a pair of inverted and non-inverted signals). Multi-phase RX (MPRX) sensing is another example of a multi-phase scan mode. In MPRX sensing, multiple RX electrodes are coupled (e.g., connected) to a receiver concurrently, and one or more differential RX receivers and multiplexers may be used to sense several RX electrodes at the same time. For instance, in MPRX scan mode, output signals having different phases (e.g., polarities) from one or more RX electrodes may be convoluted into a single signal that is acquired from the capacitive sensor array. But fails to disclose wherein a specific number of data lines is arranged in a lower region of an electrode at lower left where the sensing voltage is detected among the electrodes, and the driving voltage or the ground potential is applied to the specific number of data lines through a compensation pattern differently from other data lines. However, Lee (Fig 1, 2 and 4-7) discloses number of data lines is arranged in a lower region of an electrode at lower left where the sensing voltage is detected among the electrodes and (Fig 2, 4-7 and Par 0048-0054) discloses the driving voltage or the ground potential (i.e. signal) is applied to the specific number of data lines (20) through a compensation pattern (25) differently from other data lines. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 2-9 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Prior art of record singularly or in combination thereon fails to disclose the claim limitation of claims 2 and 17 wherein; As to claim 2; a repair switch configured to block electrical connection between the DAC and specific data lines when a short circuit occurs in the specific data lines, and the specific number of data lines is connected to pins of the repair switch. Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENYAM KETEMA whose telephone number is (571)270-7224. The examiner can normally be reached on 9AM-5PM (M-F). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached on 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENYAM KETEMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737094
INFORMATION INTERACTION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730502
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING EXTERNAL ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING REMOTE CONTROL DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724478
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725568
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY CONTROLLING DISPLAY PIXELS
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720968
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 10m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month