Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/332,808

FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM HAVING AN ELECTRIC ACTUATOR FOR CONTROLLING A HYDRAULIC SERVO CONTROL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Priority
Dec 12, 2024 — FR FR2413949
Examiner
BUTLER, RODNEY ALLEN
Art Unit
3666
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Airbus SAS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
884 granted / 1002 resolved
+36.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1037
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Application The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Status of the Claims This action is in response to the applicant’s filing on September 18, 2025. Claims 1 – 12 are pending and examined below. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. In lines 5 – 13 of claim 1, applicant recites “the electric flight control system comprising an electric actuator for controlling the servo control, the electric actuator comprising a plurality of stators and a rotor member moved by the plurality of stators, wherein the actuating subassembly comprises three external duplex computers for controlling the electric actuator as a function of the at least one positional setpoint, the plurality of stators comprising only three stators electrically connected to three respective switching devices of the electric actuator”. (Emphasis added.) In lines 14 – 15 of claim 1, applicant recites “the same internal simplex computer“, which lacks antecedent basis. In line 1 of claims 5, 6 and 8, applicant attempts to narrow the scope of claim 1 by detailing structural aspects of the “switching device” and the “internal simplex computer”. However, in claim 1, both the switching device and the internal simplex computer are inferentially claimed. In other words, neither element is positively recited as a part of the claimed “electric flight control system”. Clarification is required as to whether the switching device and the internal simplex computer are physical elements of the claimed “electric flight control system”. Any claims not specifically mentioned herein above, but nonetheless rejected as being indefinite, are rejected for incorporating the errors of their respective base claims by dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 12 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. §112, 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent toapplicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0099050 A1 to Estival et al. who discloses an electromechanical actuator for electrical flight controls of an aircraft, the actuator comprising a transmission shaft, four electromechanical conversion members, each having a respective stator and rotor secured to the transmission shaft, and four control systems, each dedicated to respective ones of the electromechanical conversion members. The stator has teeth and windings surrounding at least one tooth, whereas the rotor is provided with permanent magnets. Each electromechanical conversion member is a flux-concentrating member and each winding is concentric and has a single layer. The electromechanical actuator is intended in particularly for controlling a hydraulic actuator via a mechanical transmission within an electrical flight control device of an aircraft. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY A. BUTLER whose telephone number is (313)446-6513. The examiner can normally be reached on weekdays, Monday through Friday, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne M. Antonucci can be reached on weekdays, Monday through Friday, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. at (313) 446-6519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Electronic Communications Prior to initiating the first e-mail correspondence with any examiner, Applicant is responsible for filing a written statement with the USPTO in accordance with MPEP §502.03 II. All received e-mail messages including e-mail attachments shall be placed into this application’s record. /RODNEY A BUTLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3666
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743092
METHOD AND SERVER FOR REMOTELY CONTROLLING VEHICLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741679
VEHICLE BEHAVIOR CONTROL METHOD AND VEHICLE BEHAVIOR CONTROL DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736968
ROBOTIC VEHICLE NAVIGATON SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735031
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728724
MARKING LINE DETECTION DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.9%)
1y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month