Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/333,264

Stabilized Formulations Containing Anti-Interleukin-4 Receptor (IL-4R) Antibodies

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Priority
Oct 06, 2010 — provisional 61/390,283 +7 more
Examiner
LI, RUIXIANG
Art Unit
1674
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
612 granted / 1029 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1057
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1029 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Status of Application, Amendments, and/or Claims A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/10/2026 has been entered. Claims 30-34 and 36-60 are pending and currently under consideration. Claim Rejections under 35 USC § 103(a) (i). The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (ii). Claims 30-34, 36-47, and 51-60 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Esue (WO 2010/102241 A1, September 10, 2010) in view of Martin et al. (US 7,608,693 B2, Oct. 27, 2009). Esue teaches a pharmaceutical composition comprising a monoclonal antibody at the concentration of 10 to 250 mg/mL, histidine-acetate and arginine-acetate buffer, pH4.5 to 6.5, polysorbate 20 at 0.01% to 0.1% (page 3, paragraphs [0013] and [0015]). Polysorbate in generally may be present at the concentration of 0.005% to 0.2% (page 24, paragraph [0108]). The histidine acetate buffer concentration is from 5 mM to 100 mM (claim 3). A polyol, such as mannitol, sucrose, or trehalose may optionally be included in the formulation (page 11, paragraph [0059]). Esue further teaches a formulation comprising an antibody that binds interleukins (paragraphs [0101] to [0103]) Esue does not teach a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-4 alpha (hIL-4Rα) comprising a heavy chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 and a light chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:5. Martin et al. teach a human antibody that specifically binds hIL-4Rα or a human monoclonal antibody comprising a heavy chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO: 1 and a light chain variable region comprising SEQ ID NO: 5, which is acknowledged in the instant specification (page 12, lines 20-24). It would have been obvious for one skilled in the art to modify the formulation of Esue and to make a formulation comprising a human antibody that specifically binds hIL-4Rα taught by Martin et al with a reasonable expectation of success. One would have been motivated to do so because Esue teaches a formulation comprising an antibody that binds interleukins (paragraphs [0101] to [0103]) and the formulation of Esue is expected to stabilize the antibody that specifically binds hIL-4Rα taught by Martin et al. (iii). Claims 48-50 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Esue (WO 2010/102241 A1, September 10, 2010) in view of Martin et al. (US 7,608,693 B2, Oct. 27, 2009) as applied to claims 30-34, 36-47, and 51-60 above, and further in view of Andya et al. (US 8,372,396 B2, Feb. 12, 2013; 102 (e) date: Oct. 20, 2004). Esue and Martin et al. in combination teach a pharmaceutical composition comprising a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-4Rα as applied to claims 30-34, 36-47, and 51-60 above. Esue and Martin et al. do not teach the concentration of the thermal stabilizer, such as sucrose or trehalose, recited in claims 48-50. Andya et al. teach a monoclonal antibody formulation comprising 10 to 250 mg/mL antibody, histidine-acetate buffer, pH5.5 to 6.5, 60 mM to 250 mM (2.0% w/v to 8.5% w/v) sucrose or trehalose, and 0.01% to 0.1% polysorbate 20 (column 9, the first paragraph). The histidine concentration is 20 mM and the acetate concentration is 11.6 mM (Example 10). It would have been obvious for one skilled in the art to modify the formulation of taught by Esue and Martin et al. in combination and to make a formulation comprising the particular concentrations of sucrose or trehalose and the particular concentration of acetate-histidine buffer taught by Andya et al with a reasonable expectation of success. One would have been motivated to do so because determining the concentration of the thermal stabilizer, such as sucrose or trehalose, is routinely practiced by one of skill in the art and the formulation is expected to stabilize the antibody that specifically binds hIL-4Rα. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Advisory Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ruixiang Li whose telephone number is (571) 272-0875. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Vanessa Ford, can be reached on (571) 272-0857. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, please contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at the toll-free phone number 866-217-9197. /RUIXIANG LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1674 August 11, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 13, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729238
NANODISC-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN-BINDING CHIMERIC PROTEINS
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723068
STABILIZED MHC I
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698334
ANTI-IL-1R3 ANTIBODIES FOR USE IN INFLAMMATORY CONDITIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692478
POPULATIONS OF ENRICHED REGULATORY T CELLS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679890
ANTI-CLAUDIN 18 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 9m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1029 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month