Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/335,910

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING PRESSURE ON BUTTON

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Priority
Dec 02, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0176921 +2 more
Examiner
SHERMAN, STEPHEN G
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1354 granted / 1649 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1676
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1649 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 22 September 2025 and 3 April 2026 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 11 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 117519512 A) in view of Mölne (US 2010/0045612). Regarding claim 1, Zhang et al. disclose an electronic device (Figures 1-6) comprising: a housing (Figures 1-2, 21 and 22 are a housing); a first button and a second button disposed on a side surface of the housing (Figures 1-2, 100 comprises a first button and a second button as shown in Figure 3 where there are two buttons 12.); a display disposed at a front surface of the housing (See page 17 of the provided document, second full paragraph, which recites: “Referring to FIG. 1 to FIG. 6, an embodiment of the invention provides a haptic feedback system 100, which is applied to a terminal device 200…the terminal device 200 can be a mobile phone…” where, if the device is a mobile phone, it is well-know that mobile phones have a display disposed at a front surface of the housing.); a first pressure sensor configured to sense a first pressure on the first button (Figure 3 shows that there is a first pressure sensor 2 for the first button 12 [left button 12 in the Figure], which will sense a first pressure.); a second pressure sensor configured to sense a second pressure on the second button (Figure 3 shows that there is a second pressure sensor 2 for the second button 12 [right button 12 in the Figure], which will sensor a second pressure.); and a vibration element configured to output a vibration based on the first pressure or the second pressure (Figure 3 shows a vibration element 3. See page 17 of the provided document, sixth full paragraph, which recites: “the touch feedback vibrator 3, the touch feedback vibrator 3 is used for according to the pressure parameter collected by the pressure sensor 2 to perform the corresponding vibration feedback driving; the pressure sensor 2 and the pressing part 1 are rigidly connected to form an integrated module, the integrated module is flexibly connected with the middle frame 22 through an elastic body 5, and the deformation direction of the elastic body 5 is consistent with the vibration direction of the touch feedback vibrator 3. The flexible connection between the tactile feedback vibrator 3 and the middle frame 22 not only can realize local vibration, but also can shield or reduce the tactile feedback in the unwanted direction because of the flexible connection between the integrated module and the middle frame 22. At the same time, the frequency response range of the haptic feedback system 100 can be enlarged and the amount of vibration can be enlarged at the resonance point of the haptic feedback system 100. The F0 (working frequency) of the haptic feedback system 100 can be controlled to be more than 300 Hz to meet different vibration requirements” and also page 18 of the provided document, first full paragraph, which recites: “In the embodiment, the pressing part 1 comprises a key main body 11 and at least one key cap 12 formed by the key main body 11 protruding out of the middle frame 22, the key main body 11 is set on the inner side of the middle frame 22, the key cap 12 is set in the through hole 221, one side of each key cap 12 close to the tactile feedback vibrator 3 is correspondingly provided with one pressure sensor 2; The key body 11 can realize the strain and reset generated after being pressed. the key cap 12 is pressed to transmit the pressure to the pressure sensor 2 through the key main body 11, the pressure sensor 2 collects the pressed pressure parameter, the signal of the pressure parameter is transmitted to the tactile feedback vibrator 3, the tactile feedback vibrator 3 outputs the corresponding vibration frequency according to the pressure parameter, It is used for providing touch feedback for experiencing good feeling.”.); wherein the electronic device is configured to: identify, using the first pressure sensor, the first pressure on the first button (Figure 3, the first pressure will be identified for the first button when pressed, using the first pressure sensor.), based on identifying the first pressure, output, using the vibration element, a first vibration corresponding to the first pressure (Page 18 of the provided document, first full paragraph, which recites: “In the embodiment, the pressing part 1 comprises a key main body 11 and at least one key cap 12 formed by the key main body 11 protruding out of the middle frame 22, the key main body 11 is set on the inner side of the middle frame 22, the key cap 12 is set in the through hole 221, one side of each key cap 12 close to the tactile feedback vibrator 3 is correspondingly provided with one pressure sensor 2; The key body 11 can realize the strain and reset generated after being pressed. the key cap 12 is pressed to transmit the pressure to the pressure sensor 2 through the key main body 11, the pressure sensor 2 collects the pressed pressure parameter, the signal of the pressure parameter is transmitted to the tactile feedback vibrator 3, the tactile feedback vibrator 3 outputs the corresponding vibration frequency according to the pressure parameter, It is used for providing touch feedback for experiencing good feeling.” Thus, a first vibration according to the first pressure will be output.), identify, using the second pressure sensor, the second pressure on the second button (Figure 3, the second pressure will be identified for the second button when pressed, using the second pressure.), and based on identifying the second pressure, output, using the vibration element, a second vibration corresponding to the second pressure (Page 18 of the provided document, first full paragraph, which recites: “In the embodiment, the pressing part 1 comprises a key main body 11 and at least one key cap 12 formed by the key main body 11 protruding out of the middle frame 22, the key main body 11 is set on the inner side of the middle frame 22, the key cap 12 is set in the through hole 221, one side of each key cap 12 close to the tactile feedback vibrator 3 is correspondingly provided with one pressure sensor 2; The key body 11 can realize the strain and reset generated after being pressed. the key cap 12 is pressed to transmit the pressure to the pressure sensor 2 through the key main body 11, the pressure sensor 2 collects the pressed pressure parameter, the signal of the pressure parameter is transmitted to the tactile feedback vibrator 3, the tactile feedback vibrator 3 outputs the corresponding vibration frequency according to the pressure parameter, It is used for providing touch feedback for experiencing good feeling.” Thus, a second vibration according to the second pressure will be output.). Zhang et al. fail to teach wherein the vibration element is disposed between the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor, and, although Zhang et al. states that the device is a mobile phones, Zhang et al. fails to explicitly teach at least one processor comprising processing circuitry, and memory comprising one or more storage media, storing instructions, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to perform the steps. Mölne discloses an electronic device (Figures 1-3) comprising a display (Figures 1-3 and paragraph [0025].), a first pressure sensor (Figures 2-3, first 7 on the left), a second pressure sensor (Figures 2-3, second 7 on the right), a vibration element (Figure 2, 12), wherein the vibration element is disposed between a first pressure sensor and a second pressure sensor (Figure 2, 12 is located between the first 7 and the second 7 located at the closest edges shown in the Figure.), and at least one processor comprising processing circuitry (Paragraphs [0039] and [0063].), and memory comprising one or more storage media, storing instructions, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to perform steps (Paragraphs [0039] and [0063].). Therefore, it would have been obvious to “one of ordinary skill” in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the central teachings of the vibration element of Mölne, as well as using a processor and a memory, in the electronic device taught by Zhang et al. The motivation to combine would have been in order to provide a more centralized location for the vibration element relative to the first and second buttons, thus providing more consistent feedback to the user. Further, moving the vibration element to be disposed between the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor would require a mere rearrangement of parts that has been held unpatentable because shifting the position would not have modified the operation of the device. In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Regarding claim 11, Zhang et al. and Mölne disclose the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the first pressure sensor is disposed under the first button (Zhang et al.: Figure 3 shows the first pressure sensor 2 is disposed under the first button 12.); and wherein the second pressure sensor is disposed under the second button (Zhang et al.: Figure 3 shows the second pressure sensor 2 is disposed under the second button 12.). Regarding claim 14, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 1. Claims 9 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 117519512 A) in view of Mölne (US 2010/0045612) and further in view of Welch et al. (US 11,816,056). Regarding claim 9, Zhang et al. and Mölne disclose the electronic device of claim 1. Zhang et al. and Mölne fail to teach wherein the electronic device further comprises: a third button disposed on the side surface of the housing, and a switch circuit for sensing an input on the third button; and wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: in response to the first pressure on the first button and the input on the third button being maintained during reference time, reset the electronic device. Welch et al. disclose a electronic device comprises: a third button disposed on the side surface of a housing (Figure 2 shows first, second and third buttons on the side surface of a housing: 220, 222 and 224.), and a switch circuit for sensing an input on the third button (Figure 4 and column 18, line 64 to column 19, line 19.); and wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: in response to first pressure on the first button and the input on the third button being maintained during reference time, reset the electronic device (column 18, line 64 to column 19, line 19: “multiple button presses for a factory reset” which clearly will have to occur for some period of time during which both buttons are pressed for the reset to take place, i.e. a non-zero time is a reference time.). Hence the prior art includes each element claimed although not necessarily in a single prior art reference, with the only difference between the claimed invention and the prior art being the lack of the actual combination of the elements in a single prior art reference. In combination, the combination of Zhang et al. and Mölne performs the same function as it does separately of providing an electronic device comprising side buttons and vibration, and Welch et al. performs the same function as it does separately of providing three side buttons, where two can be pressed together for a device reset. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods, and that in combination, each element merely performed the same function as it does separately. The results of the combination would have been predictable and resulted in a third button disposed on the side surface of a housing and providing resetting the device when pressure is applied to the first button and the third button is also pressed. Therefore, the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 20, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 9. Claims 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (CN 117519512 A) in view of Mölne (US 2010/0045612) and further in view of Hashimoto et al. (JP 2004-039278 A). Regarding claim 12, Zhang et al. and Mölne disclose the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the electronic device comprises a button assembly for the first button and the second button (Zhang et al.: Figure 3.); wherein the button assembly further comprises: a base frame including a protrusion unit formed to protrude from the side surface of the housing (Zhang et al.: Figure 3, 11 is a based frame.). While Zhang et al. discloses a rubber 5 in Figure 3, Zhang et al. and Mölne fail to teach: a first rubber for cushioning an impact, under the base frame; and a second rubber for waterproof from an outside of the housing, connected to the first rubber. Hashimoto et al. disclose a button assembly comprising: a first rubber for cushioning an impact, under a base frame (Figure 1, 2c and paragraph [0018].); and a second rubber for waterproof from an outside of the housing, connected to the first rubber (Figure 1, 2e and paragraph [0019].). Therefore, it would have been obvious to “one of ordinary skill” in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the rubber teachings of Hashimoto et al. in the button assembly taught by the combination of Zhang et al. and Mölne. The motivation to combine would have been in order to prevent water from entering between the buttons when operated and the button hole on the surface (See paragraph [0001] of Hashimoto et al.). Regarding claim 13, Zhang et al., Mölne and Hashimoto et al. disclose the electronic device of claim 12, wherein the first button is defined based on a first portion of the base frame, and wherein the second button is defined based on a second portion of the base frame (Zhang et al.: Figure 1, the first button 12 is defined by a first portion of 11 and the second button 12 is defined by a second portion of 11.). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 10 and 15-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reasons for indicating allowable subject matter in claim 2 is the inclusion of the limitations reciting “wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: in case that the first pressure on the first button is not identified using the first pressure sensor and a third pressure on the first button is identified using the vibration element, identify malfunction associated with the first button” which, in combination with the other recited features, is not taught and/or suggested either singularly or in combination within the prior art. Zhang et al. does disclose, on page 18 of the provided document, last paragraph. Which recites “In this embodiment, the haptic feedback system 100 further comprises a touch module for detecting the gesture operation. And it can avoid some wrong operation, such as the trigger caused by the change of the pressure value caused by the external force such as falling, extruding and so on. However, when there is no touch module, the included pressure sensor 2 module can also be used for gesture operation detection, such as sliding, multi-level pressure and so on.” However, Zhang et al. fail to provide any specifics, and thus fails to teach the specific malfunction identification as highlighted above. Claims 3-8 are indicated as having allowable subject matter due to their dependency from claim 2. The primary reasons for indicating allowable subject matter in claim 10 is the inclusion of the limitations reciting “wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: based on identifying, via the vibration element, a third pressure on the first button, identify that a function allocated to the first pressure on the first button is not executed during a reference time interval, and based on identifying that the function allocated to the first pressure on the first button is not executed during the reference time interval, detect malfunction associated with the first button” which, in combination with the other recited features, is not taught and/or suggested either singularly or in combination within the prior art. Claim 15 is indicated as having allowable subject matter for the same reasons as claim 2. Claims 16-19 are indicated as having allowable subject matter due to their dependency from claim 15. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN G SHERMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2941. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 4pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, AMR AWAD can be reached at (571)272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN G SHERMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621 17 June 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705794
Method And Device For Reproducing Position And Orientation Of (Long) Bone Fragments
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693822
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VISUAL FEEDBACK
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693739
EYE AND HAND TRACKING UTILIZING LENSLESS CAMERA AND MACHINE LEARNING
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682431
NOISE, FLARE, AND/OR OTHER DEGRADATION SUPPRESSION AND/OR REMOVAL FOR IMAGES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676021
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING TWO FUNCTIONAL UNITS DRIVEN BY TWO CIRCUITRIES RESPECTIVELY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month