Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/338,433

PAIRING METHOD, POSITION DETECTING SYSTEM, POSITION INDICATOR AND POSITION DETECTING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 24, 2025
Priority
Oct 18, 2016 — JP 2016-204444 +5 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, KEVIN M
Art Unit
2628
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Wacom Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
784 granted / 991 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 991 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/25/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendments to the claims filed 9/25/2026 were received and have been entered. Claims 1 and 8 have been amended. Claims 3-4 and 10-11 have been canceled. Therefore, claims 1-2, 5-9 and 12-17 are currently pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-2, 5-9 and 12-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 5-9 and 12-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Black et al. (US 2015/0116272). As to claim 1, Black teaches a position detecting apparatus (a tablet device 115, ¶14, ¶16, Figs 1-3) comprising: a first wireless communication device (Bluetooth, ¶24, ¶33); a second wireless communication device (capacitive coupling, see at least ¶31); and controls the second wireless communication device to transmit a command signal (see at least ¶35) to a stylus (a smart pen 110) via capacitive coupling between the stylus and the position detecting apparatus, controls the second wireless communication device to receive, from the stylus in response to the command signal (see ¶39-¶46), configuration information via the capacitive coupling between the stylus and the position detecting apparatus (See ¶16); the processor (225, ¶35), in operation, establishes a pairing with the stylus via the first wireless communication device based on the configuration information received from the stylus. (See ¶25). As to claim 8, Black teaches a stylus (a smart pen 110, see ¶14, ¶16, Figs 1-3), a first wireless communication device (Bluetooth, ¶24, ¶33), a second wireless communication device (capacitive coupling, see at least ¶31); controls the second wireless communication device to receive a command signal (see at least ¶35) from a position detecting apparatus (a tablet 115) via capacitive coupling between the stylus and the position detecting apparatus, controls the second wireless communication device to transmit, to the position detecting apparatus in response to the command signal (see ¶39-¶46), configuration information via the capacitive coupling between the stylus and the position detecting apparatus (See ¶16), a processor (a processor 225, ¶35) that, in operation, establishes a pairing with the position detecting apparatus via the first wireless communication device based on the configuration information communicated with the position detecting apparatus. (See¶25). As to claims 2, 9, Black teaches the first wireless communication device, in operation, communicates based on capacitive coupling between the stylus and a sensor electrode of the position detecting apparatus. (See ¶23-¶24). As to claims 5, 12, Black teaches wherein a communication range of the first wireless communication device is longer than a communication range of the second wireless communication device. (See ¶3 and ¶51 for the Bluetooth range is longer than the proximity sensing range). As to claims 6, 13, Black teaches wherein the processor, in operation, establishes the pairing with the stylus via the first wireless communication device based on an identifier communicated via the capacitive coupling between the stylus and the position detecting apparatus. (See Black ¶25-¶51). As to claim 7, Black teaches wherein, after the pairing is established, based on whether reception information received via the second wireless communication device includes information related to the identifier, the processor determines whether the reception information is from the stylus. (See Black ¶46). As to claim 14, Black teaches the stylus according to claim 8, wherein the configuration information indicates a pairing request. (Black ¶23). As to claim 15, Black teaches the stylus according to claim 8, wherein the configuration information includes proximity information (Black ¶51). As to claim 16, Black teaches the position detecting apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the configuration information indicates a pairing request. (Black ¶23). As to claim 17, Black teaches the position detecting apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the configuration information includes proximity information. (Black ¶51). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Nguyen whose telephone is (571)272-7697. The examiner can normally be reached M-T 8am-5pm Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nitin K Patel can be reached on 571-272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin M Nguyen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628 Email: kevin.nguyen2@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jul 24, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 17, 2026
Interview Requested
Sep 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769406
Input Device For 2D Pointing and 3D Force Feedback
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763018
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763013
DISPLAY DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD OF DRIVING DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755697
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757599
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 11m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 991 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month