Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/343,707

METHOD FOR ALIGNMENT ACROSS LAYERS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Priority
Dec 30, 2019 — provisional 62/954,844 +2 more
Examiner
SHAHNAMI, AMIR
Art Unit
2483
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
374 granted / 456 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
470
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
54.7%
+14.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 456 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim under US PRO 62954844 filed on 12/30/2019. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (US 2014/0086333 A1). Regarding claims 15-20, claim 15 claims a product by process claim limitation where the product is the bitstream and the process is the method steps to generate the bitstream. MPEP §2113 recites “Product-by-Process claims are not limited to the manipulations of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps”. Thus, the scope of the claim is the storage medium storing the bitstream (with the structure implied by the method steps). The structure includes the information and samples manipulated by the steps. “To be given patentable weight, the printed matter and associated product must be in a functional relationship. A functional relationship can be found where the printed matter performs some function with respect to the product to which it is associated”. MPEP §2111.05(I)(A). When a claimed “computer-readable medium merely serves as a support for information or data, no functional relationship exists. MPEP §2111.05(III). The memory storing the claimed bitstream in claim 15 merely services as a support for the storage of the bitstream and provides no functional relationship between the stored bitstream and storage medium. Therefor the bitstream, which scope is implied by the method steps, is non-functional descriptive material and given no patentable weight. MPEP §2111.05(III). Thus, the claim scope is just a storage medium storing data and is anticipated by Wang which recites a storage medium storing a bitstream. Wang discloses, a bitstream of compressed video data, including a computer readable storage medium storing the compressed non-transitory video data (Wang [0060] and [0044]-[0045] – storing syntax elements to a computer-readable storage medium in an encoded bitstream at the time of encoding). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The various claimed limitations mentioned in the claims are not taught or suggested by the prior art taken either singly or in combination, with emphasize that it is each claim, taken as a whole, including the interrelationships and interconnections between various claimed elements make them allowable over the prior art of record. The various claimed limitations mentioned including the interrelationships and all of the limitations of the base claim and the elements with respect to – receiving video data comprising a coded video sequence (CVS); obtaining a picture header (PH) network abstraction layer (NAL) unit included in a picture header; obtaining at least one coded slice NAL unit corresponding to the PH NAL unit; obtaining a picture parameter set (PPS) included in a PPS NAL unit from the coded video sequence, the PPS NAL unit is referenced by the PH NAL unit and the coded slice NAL unit, and the PPS NAL unit includes a first layer identifier of the PPS NAL unit; obtaining a sequence parameter set (SPS) included in an SPS network abstraction layer (NAL) unit of a coded video layer sequence (CLVS) obtained from the CVS, the SPS NAL unit, which includes the SPS, is directly referenced by the PPS NAL unit, a value of an SPS parameter_set_id variable is the same in all SPSs referred to by the CLVS in the CVS; and decoding a coded picture based on the PPS NAL unit and the SPS NAL unit (along with an accompanying method of encoding). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Hendry – US 2015/0373338 A1 Zhu – US 2013/0113996 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMIR SHAHNAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-0707. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571-272-7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMIR SHAHNAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739392
QUANTIZATION PARAMETER CODING
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739409
LUMA MAPPING WITH CHROMA SCALING ADAPTATION PARAMETER SET IN VIDEO CODING
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725432
OBJECT DETECTION DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726619
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING AN IMAGE BASED ON IN-LOOP FILTER
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720092
IMPLICIT TRANSFORM SELECTION
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 456 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month