Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/352,998

CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 08, 2025
Priority
Oct 30, 2024 — JP 2024-190336
Examiner
KESSIE, DANIEL
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
439 granted / 708 resolved
-6.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 708 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1–5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Yumita et al. (US 9,884,564 B2) in view of Sellner et al. (US 2012/0249070 A1). Regarding claim 1, Yumita teaches an electrically powered vehicle including a power storage device capable of charging and discharging power for traveling of the vehicle (power storage device 110) (Yumita, col. 5–6). Yumita further teaches a discharging unit including an inverter that converts DC power of the power storage device into AC power and outputs the converted AC power to an outside of the vehicle (inverter 510 supplying AC to an external load) (Yumita, FIG. 1; col. 7–8). Yumita teaches a processor (vehicle ECU 300) configured to control the electric system (Yumita, col. 6–7). Yumita teaches a sensing unit that senses a reduction in insulation resistance of the electric system (detector 200 producing voltage Vk decreasing with insulation reduction) (Yumita, col. 6). However, Yumita does not expressly teach sensing a reduction in insulation resistance from an AC side of the inverter to the power storage device, nor sensing insulation reduction before connection of a relay that switches between a cut‑off state and a connected state of an electric path connecting the AC side of the inverter and the outside of the vehicle. Sellner teaches insulation monitoring from the AC side of the charging/discharging interface and determining insulation resistance before enabling charging/discharging, only permitting connection when insulation reduction is not detected (Sellner ¶¶ [0009]–[0014], [0028]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Yumita’s insulation‑monitoring arrangement to include Sellner’s AC‑side insulation monitoring and pre‑connection determination in order to improve safety and avoid mis‑detection during external power supply. As modified, Yumita in view of Sellner teaches the processor sensing insulation reduction before connection of the relay and issuing a command to switch the relay to the connected state when no reduction is sensed. Regarding claim 2, Yumita in view of Sellner teaches the system of claim 1, and Yumita teaches exchanging information necessary for external power supply between the vehicle and the external device (vehicle ECU 300 communicating with power supply ECU 550 during external power supply) (Yumita, col. 7–9). Sellner teaches performing insulation monitoring while exchanging information necessary for charging/discharging (Sellner ¶¶ [0027]–[0029]). Regarding claim 3, Yumita in view of Sellner teaches the system of claim 1, and Yumita teaches stopping the operation of the insulation‑decrease detector after the relay is connected to avoid interference with external insulation‑monitoring functions (Yumita, col. 7–8). Sellner likewise teaches switching off the vehicle‑side insulation monitoring instrument after the charging/recovery process begins (Sellner ¶ [0028]). Regarding claim 4, Yumita in view of Sellner teaches the system of claim 1, and Yumita teaches that the relay (power supply relay 160) is included in the discharging unit of the vehicle (Yumita, FIG. 1; col. 6–7). Regarding claim 5, Yumita in view of Sellner teaches the system of claim 1, and Sellner teaches that switching elements may be provided outside the vehicle, such as in the charging station or charging cable (Sellner ¶¶ [0034]–[0039]). Sellner further teaches that insulation monitoring may extend across external switching elements (Sellner ¶¶ [0027]–[0029]). It would have been obvious to provide the relay outside the vehicle and sense insulation reduction from the relay to the inverter to coordinate safety functions between the vehicle and the external charging/discharging device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL KESSIE whose telephone number is (571)272-4449. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pmEst. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL KESSIE/ 06/04/2026Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695379
CHARGE PUMP INTEGRATION IN WIRELESS CHARGER POWER MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676512
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658712
AUTONOMOUS POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651999
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION, CONTROL DEVICE, AND PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630020
BATTERY MONITORING DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 2m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 708 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month