Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/353,645

Waste container and method for using the same

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Priority
Apr 13, 2023 — SE 2350431-9 +1 more
Examiner
SMALLEY, JAMES N
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Frostgreen AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
945 granted / 1337 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -10% lift
Without
With
+-9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1382
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1337 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 3. Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Foremost, Examiner notes this may not be an exhaustive list of all errors under this statue found in the instant claims. Applicant is responsible for ensuring that the claims are fully in compliance with the statute. Regarding claim 1, the term “the activation” in line 21 lacks proper antecedent basis in the claims. Further regarding claim 1, the phrase “the sidewall surfaces…being arranged to engage by” is indefinite because it is not clear if the surfaces are arranged to engage something, or the phrase should be “arranged to be engaged by” and they are configured to receive something. Further regarding claim 1, the phrase “one into the other” is indefinite because it is not certain which elements the phrase is referring back to. Further regarding claim 1, the phrase “a result of elastic material deformation of the material” is indefinite because it is not clear if the first and second parts are deforming, or the claim is limiting the material itself deforming. While these may be the same thing, Examiner notes claims normally limit the function of the elements of the apparatus, and not the function of the material itself. Regarding claim 17, it is not clear if the basket part and lid part are the first and second part of parent claim 1 from which it depends. If not, it is not clear what the difference is between these terms. Regarding claim 18, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Further regarding claim 18, the terms “a first sealing surface” and “a second sealing surface” already find proper antecedent basis in claim 1, through the dependency of parent claim 17. Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claims 1-21 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. 5. The closest references the Examiner was able to locate were: a) US 12,257,755 (Wall) teaching the claimed material of plastic with at least 30% volume of wooden fibers. b) US 5,348,549 (Brown) teaching a medical waste container with non-continuous interlock. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES N SMALLEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4547. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 am to 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES N SMALLEY/Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767397
Closure Structure And Container With Closure Structure
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767433
Foot operated garbage bin lid opening system
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759767
CONTAINER, CLOSURE, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12735233
CUP LID AND CUP
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722856
CONTAINER FOR CONTENTS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (-9.8%)
2y 9m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1337 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month