Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/368,893

NICKEL-BASED LITHIUM METAL COMPOSITE OXIDE, PREPARING METHOD THEREOF, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING POSITIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Priority
Jun 30, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0080492 +1 more
Examiner
ZEMUI, NATHANAEL T
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
267 granted / 477 resolved
-9.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.3%
+26.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 477 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/17/2026 has been entered. Status of Claims Claim 1 is amended. Claims 1-17 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1, as presently amended, requires “an amount of the cobalt in the small secondary particles is less than an amount of the cobalt in the large secondary particles”. However, this limitation does not find adequate support in the instant specification as contended by applicant. Specifically, the instant specification merely provides support for a molar content of cobalt in the small secondary particles of 0.01 to 0.05 and a molar content of cobalt in the large secondary particles of 0.01 to 0.08. For the large secondary particles, each exemplary composition provided in the instant specification uses a cobalt molar content which is always less than the cobalt molar content of the small secondary particles used in each exemplary embodiment of the instant specification. Accordingly, the instant specification does not appear to provide any support for “an amount of the cobalt in the small secondary particles is less than an amount of the cobalt in the large secondary particles”. While the maximum molar content of cobalt in the small secondary particles is less than the maximum molar content of cobalt in the large secondary particles, absence any further description in the specification, the above cited limitation is considered to be new matter. Claims 2-17 are rejected as being dependent on claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. As noted in the above 112(a) rejection, the subject matter as presently claimed recited new matter. Applicant is urged to show where in specification the newly amended claim 1 finds support. It is noted that in the absence of adequate support in the specification for “an amount of the cobalt in the small secondary particles is less than an amount of the cobalt in the large secondary particles”, the presently claimed subject matter would be found obvious over the combined teachings of Choi, Shin (as cited in the previous Office Action) and Kawamoto (US 2025/0266441 A1) which discloses an amount of cobalt in small secondary NCM particles which is less than an amount of cobalt in large secondary NCM particles within a positive electrode. Thus, in view of foregoing, claims 1-17 stand rejected. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kawamoto (US 2025/0266441 A1) discloses an amount of cobalt in small secondary NCM particles which is less than an amount of cobalt in large secondary NCM particles ([0026]-[0029]). Feng (US 2017/0155139 A1) and Hiratsuka (US 2021/0265627 A1) each disclose a lithium secondary battery comprising a cathode including a Ni-based lithium metal oxide active material having a bimodal particle size distribution including large secondary particles and small secondary particles. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANAEL T ZEMUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4894. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BARBARA GILLIAM can be reached on (571)272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANAEL T ZEMUI/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Feb 19, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738520
FUEL BATTERY CELL AND FUEL BATTERY MODULE
5y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738488
NICKEL-BASED ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING POSITIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING THE NICKEL-BASED ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738490
NICKEL-BASED ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING POSITIVE ELECTRODE INCLUDING THE NICKEL-BASED ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738570
THERMAL INSULATING MAT FOR BATTERY SYSTEMS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12712210
LAMINATED OXIDATION PROTECTED SEPARATOR
12y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 7m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month