Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/369,512

LUBRICATING AND/OR COOLING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Priority
Nov 04, 2024 — DE 10 2024 132 036.2
Examiner
RIEGELMAN, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Magna Powertrain GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
767 granted / 980 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1010
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 980 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Suga, US PGPub 2006/0219620. PNG media_image1.png 418 560 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Suga discloses a lubricating and/or cooling system (see fig 4) for use in a motor vehicle (see [0212]), comprising a first oil container (P1) with oil and a pump unit (connected with Q – see [0077]) for conveying the oil from the first oil container (P1), wherein a first separating device (S) is arranged in the first oil container (P1), and wherein the first separating device (S and connecting components) is arranged in the first oil container (P1) with an inclination (See fig 4) to the direction of flow of the oil (vertically in fig 4), namely in a direction of inclination in the direction of an oil intake point (intake into Q) of the pump unit (as described above), including an angle (angle between 5 and S in fig 4) of inclination with respect to the direction of flow of the oil (as described above). Regarding claim 2, Suga discloses the lubricating and/or cooling system according to Claim 1, wherein the angle of inclination (as described above) with respect to the direction of flow of the oil is < 60 degrees (appears ~15 degrees in fig 4) Regarding claim 3, Suga discloses the lubricating and/or cooling system according to Claim 1, wherein the first separating device (S and connecting components) as at least one screen (S) Regarding claim 4, Suga discloses the lubricating and/or cooling system according to Claim 1, wherein the first separating device (as described above) is arranged directly (see fig 4) in the first oil container (P1). Regarding claim 5, Suga discloses the lubricating and/or cooling system according to Claim 1, wherein the lubricating and/or cooling system has a second oil container (within engine), wherein the second oil container (vertically above P1 in fig 4) is arranged in relation to the first oil container (P1) at a level above it, and wherein oil can be conveyed from the first oil container (P1) into the second oil container (as described abvovce) via the pump unit (oil pump) via at least one mechanical component (oil pipe). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suga in view of Hueppchen et al., US Patent 7,845,500. Regarding claims 6-8, Suga discloses the lubricating and/or cooling system according to Claim 5, but does not disclose a second separating device is arranged in the second oil container. PNG media_image2.png 768 454 media_image2.png Greyscale Hueppchen et al. teaches a similar lubrication system (see fig 1) wherein a second separating device (23) is arranged above a first separating device (31) in the specified arrangement (see fig 1). (claim 6) wherein the second separating device (23) has at least one filter. (claim 7) wherein the second separating device (23) would be arranged directly in the second oil container or indirectly in the second oil container, installed in a separate structural unit. (claim 8) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the prefilter and filter described by Hueppchen et al. to the system disclosed by Suga in order to remove relatively large contaminants before they reach the main filter helping to prevent clogging, damage and flow restriction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7956. The examiner can normally be reached 8-6 EST Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Hodge can be reached at (571) 272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL A. RIEGELMAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3654 /MICHAEL A RIEGELMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759843
METHOD FOR ONLINE REPLACEMENT AND METHOD FOR INSTALLATION OF ELEVATOR SHEAVE LINER, AND ELEVATOR SHEAVE LINER
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753877
SHAFT LUBRICATION SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753763
Adaptive Lubricator Box
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748236
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A DISPENSING EVENT IN A BULK PRODUCT DISPENSING SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747136
Hoistway Mechanics of Panoramic Vacuum Elevator
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 980 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month