Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/372,815

DISK DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR DISK DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Priority
Mar 24, 2025 — JP 2025-048014
Examiner
TZENG, FRED
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 781 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
793
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§102
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 781 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are present for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/29/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: No Summary in the Specification. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8, , 15, 16, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Muro et al (US 2010/0299565), hereinafter as Muro, in view of Zhao et al (US 2022/0179762), hereinafter as Zhao. RE claims 1 and 15, Muro discloses the invention substantially as claimed. Muro discloses that a disk device (see figure 1 and sections [0028], [0033], [0034], [0037]; i.e., the disk array apparatus 100) comprising: a nonvolatile memory including a storage area including multiple access units and a management information storage area in which defect management information is stored (see figures 1&3 and sections [0091], [0094], [0097], [0104], [0107], [0110], [0117], [0147]-[0149]; i.e., the nonvolatile memory 115 including multiple access units, such as memory chips 301/302/303/304, and a management information storage area, such as the invalidity management table 218 in which the bad sector information of the nonvolatile memory 115 being stored, or in which defect management information is stored), each of the multiple access units being smaller than a defect management unit managed by the defect management information in the storage area (see figures 3&4 and sections [0110], [0112], [0147]-[0150]; i.e., each of the memory chips 301/302/303/304, for example, memory chip 301 comprising of Banks 305/306, wherein as the invalidity management table 218 can be stored within/across more than two Banks, thus each of the memory chips 301/302/303/304 can be regarded as smaller than the invalidity management table 218). However, Muro does not specifically disclose that a controller accessible to the nonvolatile memory, the controller being considered to execute alternative processing by re-assigning data to another access unit and rewriting data originally assigned to a defective access unit among the multiple access units. Zhao teaches that a nonvolatile storage system 100 comprising of nonvolatile memory 104 and a controller 102 to accessible to the nonvolatile memory 104, and the controller 102 being configured to execute alternative processing by re-assigning/backup data to backup block 210 and rewriting/backup data originally assigned to a defective access unit 206, among the multiple access units 206/210 (see figures 1&2 and sections [0017], [0019], [0021], [0023], [0025], [0026], [0031], [0039]). The motivation of Zhao is to eliminate the risk of data loss due to program errors (see section [0008]). Muro and Zhao are combinable because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to modify Muro by including the teaching from Zhao in order to eliminate the risk of data loss due to program errors. RE claim 2, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the defect management unit includes a block, and the access unit includes a page (see Zhao, figure 2 and section [0021]; i.e., block 206, page 208). RE claims 3 and 18, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the controller is configured to execute the alternative processing in response to occurrence of power supply cutoff (see Muro, figure 1 and section [0041]; i.e., the control circuit 111 to execute the alternative processing to occurrence of power cutoff). RE claim 4, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the controller generates or updates, according to the execution of the alternative processing, alternative management information in which an address of a defective access unit where a write error has been detected and an address of an access unit substituted for the address of the defective access unit are associated with respect to address of one or more defective access units (see Zhao, section [0025]; i.e., the mapping table linking the backup table and the defective table is managed by controller 102 and updated dynamically). RE claims 5 and 20, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the controller stores the generated or updated alternative management information in the management information storage area and makes the generated or updated alternative management information nonvolatile (see Muro, section [0107]; i.e., updating the invalidity management table 218). RE claim 6, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the controller is configured to issue a write command to the nonvolatile memory for each of the access units (see Zhao, figure 2; i.e., controller 102). RE claim 7, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that a host interface connectable to a host, wherein in a case where a write request including address-designation concerning the multiple access units is received in the host interface from the host, the controller issues multiple write commands corresponding to the multiple access units to the nonvolatile memory in response to the write request (see Zhao, figures 1&2; i.e., host connected to the nonvolatile storage system 100 through host interface, the controller 102 issues write commands to nonvolatile memory 104). RE claim 8, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein in a case where the write request is received, the controller divides write data included in the write request into multiple pieces of partial data each having an access unit size and issues the multiple write commands corresponding to the multiple pieces of partial data to the nonvolatile memory (see Zhao, figure 2; i.e., nonvolatile memory 104 contains data in size of blocks 206/210, and pages 208/212). RE claim 16, Muro in view of Zhao disclose that wherein the determining includes, in a case where a response time of a write command including address-designating of the first access unit exceeds a threshold, determining that the second access unit is a defective access unit (see Muro, sections [0065], [0094], [0099], [0102], [0105], [0113]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-14, 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sharon et al (US 2017/0249207) Chu et al (US 2008/0130156) Chen (USPN 8,417,869) Malonzo (USPN 8,959,416) Any inquiry concerning this communication from the examiner should be directed to whose telephone number is 571-272-7565. The examiner can normally be reached on weekdays from 2:0 pm to 10:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached on 571-272-0666. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications and 571-273-7565 for After Final communications. Informal regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docs for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000 (IN USA). /FRED TZENG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625 FFT September 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770643
HIGH-SPEED HIGH-VOLTAGE CMOS WRITE DRIVER
1y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755758
SINGLE DATA BAND DATA STORAGE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12755759
SERVO RECORDING APPARATUS, SERVO WRITE HEAD, METHOD OF PRODUCING A MAGNETIC TAPE, AND MAGNETIC TAPE
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12731612
CAMERA-GUIDED RETRIEVAL ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITHIN MEDIA LIBRARY
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731613
Differential Current-Mode Driver for Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.0%)
2y 6m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 781 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month