Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/375,373

SURGICAL BONE FRAME ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Priority
Nov 01, 2024 — provisional 63/833,179 +1 more
Examiner
NEGRELLIRODRIGUEZ, CHRISTINA
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Automated Intelligent Robotics LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
932 granted / 1047 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1064
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§102
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1047 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "a patient" in line 5. It is unclear whether “a patient” is referring to the patient recited in line 4, or if it is referring to a new patient. For the purpose of examining the claim, “a patient” in line 5 will be interpreted as “the patient”. Claim 10 recites the limitation "adjustable connectors" in line 3. It is unclear whether “adjustable connectors” is referring to the adjustable connectors recited in line 2 of claim 1, or if new adjustable connectors are being claimed. For the purpose of examining the claim, “adjustable connectors” in line 3 of claim 10 will be interpreted as “the adjustable connectors”. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lenke et al. (U.S. Patent No.7,655,008 B2; hereinafter “Lenke”). Regarding claim 1, Lenke discloses a surgical bone frame assembly (Figures 1-2) comprising: a frame (bridges 504 and link member 511) that includes a plurality of frame segments (504, 511) having adjustable connectors (clamping assemblies 140) for operatively and articulatively connecting to each other; a frame fastener (derotation assemblies 500) for securing the frame to a patient; and a bone support assembly (spinal stabilization element 554 and implants 550) connectable to the frame for fastening to a bone of a patient, the bone support assembly including: a bone support frame (554) for rigidly connecting to the frame, and a bone fastener (550) extending from the bone support frame for securely attaching to the bone of the patient. Regarding claim 2, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) includes a clamp (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 3, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) includes a threaded screw (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 4, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) includes a C-clamp (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 5, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) includes a jaw clamp (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 6, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) includes a pair of opposing pivotable clamp arms each having a distal end with a serrated inner surface (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 7, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone fastener (550) is a screw or a pin (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 8, Lenke further discloses wherein the plurality of frame segments (504, 511) includes a first plurality of frame segments extending between a pair of the plurality of frame segments (Figure 3). Regarding claim 9, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone support frame (554) includes an elongated rod (see elongated spinal stabilization element 554 in Figure 1) and an adjustable connector (receiver portion 552) articulatively and fixedly connecting the elongated rod to the frame (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 10, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone support frame of the bone support assembly includes a lattice structure (see elements 504, 511 in Figure 3 that form a lattice structure) of a plurality of frame segments connected via the adjustable connectors therebetween (140), the adjustable connectors articulatively and fixedly connecting the frame segments to the bone fastener (see Figure 3). Regarding claim 11, Lenke further discloses a fiducial marker operatively connected to the bone fastener, bone support assembly and/or frame (handles 506). Regarding claim 12, Lenke discloses a surgical bone frame assembly (Figures 1-2) comprising: a bone support assembly (500) for securing an orientation of bone segments of a patient, the bone support assembly including: a bone support frame (554); a plurality of bone fasteners (550) extending from the bone support frame for securely attaching to the bone segments of the patient (Figure 1); and adjustable connectors (receiver portions 552) articulatively and fixedly connecting the bone support frame to the plurality of bone fasteners (col.4, ll.19-34). Regarding claim 13, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone support frame includes a plurality of rigid frame segments (554), and the adjustable connectors operatively connect the plurality of rigid frame segments and the plurality of bone fasteners (Figure 1). Regarding claim 14, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone support frame (554) includes an elongated rod (554) and an adjustable frame connector (implant holders 502) articulatively and fixedly connecting the elongated rod to an exterior frame (504)(see Figure 1). Regarding claim 15, Lenke further discloses wherein the bone support frame of the bone support assembly includes a lattice structure of a plurality of frame segments connected via at least one adjustable support frame connector therebetween, the adjustable connectors articulatively and fixedly connecting the frame segments to the bone fastener (multiple stabilization elements 554 may be positioned along the spinal column and connected via transverse bridges 504, as shown in Figures 1-3). PNG media_image1.png 769 727 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 738 446 media_image2.png Greyscale Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure has been listed in the PTO-892, Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Christina Negrelli whose telephone number is 571-270-7389. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, between 8:00am to 4:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert, at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINA NEGRELLI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3773 /EDUARDO C ROBERT/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702391
MINIMALLY INVASIVE NO TOUCH (MINT) PROCEDURE FOR HARVESTING THE GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN (GSV), ENDOSCOPIC ASVAL TECHNIQUE AND ASSISTED PIN STRIPPING OF SUPERFICIAL GSV, HYDRODISSECTION-BASED ENDOSCOPIC VEIN HARVESTING (EVH) SYSTEM, VENOUS HYDRODISSECTOR, RETRACTOR AND TIP ADAPTER FOR USE WITH FLEXIBLE CYSTOSOPE AND ADAPTED CYSTOSCOPE SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697412
Materials For Piezoelectric Implants, and Methods of Poling Materials for Piezoelectric Response for Bone Growth Stimulation
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697223
ARTIFICIAL INTERVERTEBRAL DISC WITH LOWER HEIGHT
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697231
EXPANDABLE FUSION DEVICE AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690982
MESH SPACER HYBRID SPINAL IMPLANT
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 6m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1047 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month