Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/375,914

FIREARM TRIGGER WITH SAFETY BLADE

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Priority
Apr 12, 2023 — provisional 63/458,849 +1 more
Examiner
CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tyrant Designs Cnc LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
554 granted / 797 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
829
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 797 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-9 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,480,728. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 11 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art of record fails to disclose or fairly suggest the claimed method of securing a firearm comprising the steps of: installing a safety trigger system wherein the safety trigger system comprises: a trigger housing having a trigger housing slot; a safety blade member disposed in the trigger housing slot rotatably coupled to the trigger housing, the safety blade member having a safety blade depression portion and a safety blade engagement portion; a safety latch member disposed in the trigger housing slot rotatably coupled to the trigger housing, the safety latch member having a safety latch engagement portion and a safety blade interference portion; a resistance member disposed in the trigger housing, wherein the resistance member provides a resistance force on the safety latch member biasing the safety latch engagement portion into the safety blade member engagement portion to cause the safety blade depression portion to protrude out of the trigger housing slot through a front face of the trigger housing and biasing the safety latch member interference portion to protrude out of the trigger housing slot through a rear face of the trigger housing; and preventing the safety trigger system from traveling firing distance by creating an interference between the safety latch member interference portion and a firearm housing portion. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE CLEMENT whose telephone number is (571)272-6884. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571.272.6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE CLEMENT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704357
MOUNTING SYSTEM FOR MINI RED DOT SIGHTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704339
SEAR ASSEMBLY FOR WEAPONS
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12687363
FIREARM ACCESSORY SYSTEM AND DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674635
FIREARM ACTION MECHANISM
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12650283
ADJUSTABLE FIREARM ACCESSORY
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 8m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 797 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month