Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/376,560

HYDRAULIC PUMP WITH ELECTRONIC ADJUSTABLE PRESSURE SETTING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Priority
Jan 06, 2023 — provisional 63/478,838 +1 more
Examiner
LAZO, THOMAS E
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1199 granted / 1382 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1407
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 8, and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ballard et al. (20200001446). Regarding claim 1, Ballard et al. discloses a hydraulic power tool system comprising: a hydraulic pump (Figs. 1-9), a hydraulic tool 112 coupled to the hydraulic pump 110; a user interface 114,147 configured to receive an input corresponding to a desired change (change in mode of operation, paragraphs [0053] and [0060]) in a set pressure of the hydraulic pump; and a controller 140 in communication with the user interface 114,147 and the hydraulic pump 110, the controller 140: updating the set pressure of the hydraulic pump 110 from a first set pressure to a second set pressure based on the desired change (paragraph [0053] and [0060]), and controlling the hydraulic pump 110 until the second set pressure is reached. Regarding claim 8, Ballard et al. discloses a method of operating a hydraulic power tool system including a hydraulic pump 110, a controller 140, and a user interface 114,147, the method comprising: retrieving an input on the user interface corresponding to a desired change (change in mode of operation, paragraphs [0053] and [0060]) in a set pressure of the hydraulic pump 110; updating, via the controller 140, the set pressure of the hydraulic pump from a first set pressure to a second set pressure based on the desired change (change in mode of operation, paragraphs [0053] and [0060]); and operating the hydraulic pump 110, via the controller 140, until the second set pressure is reached. Regarding claim 14, Ballard et al. discloses a hydraulic power tool system comprising: a hydraulic pump 110; a hydraulic tool 112 coupled to the hydraulic pump 110; a user interface 114,147 configured to receive at least one of a first user input or a second user input each corresponding to a desired change (change in mode of operation, paragraphs [0053] and [0060]) in a set pressure of the hydraulic pump 110; and a controller 140 in communication with the user interface 114,147 and the hydraulic pump 110, the controller increasing the set pressure by the desired change based on the first user input or decreasing the set pressure by the desired change (change in mode of operation, paragraphs [0053] and [0060]) based on the second user input. Regarding claim 15, Ballard et al. discloses that the user interface 114 communicates with the controller 140 via a wireless connection 116 (paragraph [0056]). Regarding claim 16, Ballard et al. discloses that the user interface 147 is integrated into a housing of the hydraulic pump 110 (Figs. 7 and 9A-9C). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 -5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ballard et al., as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Vogelsanger (6,092,290). Regarding claim 2, Ballard et al. further discloses a bladder 136 that stores hydraulic fluid, a first work port 256 coupled to the bladder 136, and a switch assembly 142 (paragraph [0075], " controller 140 commands the electric motor 128 to stop and reverse the rotational motion to a second rotational direction opposite the first rotational direction.") controlled by the controller to change a direction of pressurized fluid flow through the first work port 256 based on the input at the user interface 114,147. Ballard et al. does not disclose a second work port. Vogelsanger teaches for a hydraulic pump 226 with a bladder (Fig. 14, not numbered) that stores hydraulic fluid, a manifold 228 in fluid communication with the bladder and including a work port (lines 240,242), a pump assembly 226 that pumps hydraulic fluid from the bladder through the work port, a user interface (handle 376, hand switch 234), and a controller (Fig. 15) in communication with the user interface and the pump assembly 226, and that there is (claim 2) a first work port (line 240) and a second work port (line 242), wherein the controller controls the switch assembly (handle 376, cable 388) to control a direction of flow (valve 392) of the hydraulic fluid through the first work port 240 and the second work port 242 for the purpose of operating a double acting tool (Figs. 14, 20A, and 20B). Since Ballard et al. and Vogelsanger are both in the same field of endeavor the purpose disclosed by Vogelsanger would have been recognized in the pertinent art of Ballard et al. It would have been obvious at a time before the invention was effectively filed to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the hydraulic pump of Ballard et al. to accommodate a first work port and a second work port for the purposes of operating a double acting tool. Regarding claim 3, Ballard et al. discloses that the controller adjusts the switch assembly 142 when the second set pressure is reached. Regarding claim 4, Ballard et al. and Vogelsanger discloses that the hydraulic pump can be removably coupled to the hydraulic tool, the hydraulic tool coupled to only the first work port 256 for a single acting hydraulic tool, or as taught by Vogelsanger, the hydraulic tool coupled to the first work port 240 and the second work port 242 for a double acting hydraulic tool. Regarding claim 5, Ballard et al. discloses that the user interface is a remote user interface that communicates with the controller 140 via wireless or wired connection (paragraph [0056]). Prior Art Prior art made of record but not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure for showing other hydraulic pumps with user interface and controllers for hydraulic tools. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The improvement comprises (claim 6) that the user interface includes an up button and a down button, and the controller increases the set pressure from the first set pressure to the second set pressure when the input is received at the up button, and decreases the set pressure from the first set pressure to the second set pressure when the input is received at the down button, (claim 9) displaying the set pressure via a display of the user interface and (claim 17) that the first user input corresponds to pressing an up button and the second user input corresponds to a down button. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communication from the examiner should be directed to Thomas Lazo whose telephone number is (571) 272-4818. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor Nathaniel Wiehe, can be reached on (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for this Group is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS E LAZO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 June 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 29, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742485
CANNED VALVE SEAL
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742445
GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION WITH EXTERNALLY PRESSURIZED GAS SEAL AND GAS LUBRICATION FOR A RECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733581
HARVESTER IMPLEMENT WITH DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTABLE FLOAT SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728320
Extended Ball Retrieving Device And Method
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727693
PORTABLE CHOPSTICK AND CHOPSTICK BODY ALIGNING STRUCTURE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 4m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month