Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/383,417

DATA DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Priority
Dec 30, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0200767
Examiner
DANIELSEN, NATHAN ANDREW
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
703 granted / 957 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
981
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 957 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 8-13, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Han (US 2023/0196998). • Regarding claim 1, Han discloses a display device (figure 1) comprising: a display panel including subpixels, each of the subpixels having a light-emitting element (figure 1); a data driver configured to supply a data voltage or a park voltage to the subpixels through data lines (element 140 in figure 12 and ¶s 70-73, 78-81, and 83); and a timing controller configured to control the data driver and provide a park voltage control value to the data driver (element 120 in figure 11 and ¶s 73-77), wherein the data driver generates the park voltage based on the park voltage control value (¶s 70-83). • Regarding claims 2-5 and 8-11, Han discloses everything claimed, as applied to claim 1. Additionally, Han discloses where: Claim 2: the park voltage control value is transmitted in the form of a packet through a communication interface connected between the timing controller and the data driver (¶ 80). Claim 3: the park voltage is changed into voltages of various levels in response to the park voltage control value determined according to driving conditions of the display panel (¶s 81-84). Claim 4: the data driver comprises: a first digital-to-analog converter configured to generate the park voltage (inherent in element 145 in figure 12 for performing the functions of ¶ 80); a second digital-to-analog converter configured to generate the data voltage (¶ 79); and a selector configured to selectively output one of the park voltage and the data voltage (element 120 in figure 11 and ¶ 75). Claim 5: the selector outputs the park voltage in response to a park voltage enable signal applied from the timing controller (¶ 75). Claim 8: one of the park voltage and the data voltage is output when the display panel operates in a variable refresh rate (VRR) driving mode (¶ 75). Claim 9: the VRR driving mode includes: a refresh frame for applying the data voltage through the data line connected to the subpixels of the display panel (“Refresh Time” in figure 17 and ¶ 92), and an anode reset frame for applying the park voltage through the data line (“Anode Reset Time” in figure 17 and ¶ 93). Claim 10: one of the subpixels comprises: a driving transistor configured to supply a driving current to the light-emitting element (element DT in figure 9), and a transistor connected between the data line and the driving transistor (element T1 in figure 9). Claim 11: the transistor is turned on in the refresh frame so that the data voltage is supplied to the driving transistor (¶s 58-60), and the transistor is turned off during a period in which the park voltage is provided to the data line in the anode reset frame (¶s 58-60). • Regarding claim 12, Han discloses a data driver (figure 12) comprising: a first digital-to-analog converter configured to generate a park voltage and gamma reference voltages (inherent in element 145 in figure 12 for performing the functions of ¶ 80); a second digital-to-analog converter configured to generate a data voltage based on the gamma reference voltages (¶ 79); and a selector configured to selectively output one of the park voltage and the data voltage (element 120 in figure 11 and ¶ 75), wherein the first digital-to-analog converter generates the park voltage based on an external park voltage control value (¶ 75). • Regarding claims 13 and 15, Han discloses everything claimed, as applied to claim 12. Additionally, Han discloses where: Claim 13: the selector outputs the park voltage in response to an external park voltage enable signal (¶ 75). Claim 15: a display device (figure 1) comprising: a display panel including subpixels, each of the subpixels having a light-emitting element (figure 1); and the data driver of claim 12 and configured to supply one of the park voltage or the data voltage to the subpixels through data lines (element 140 in figure 12 and ¶s 70-73, 78-81, and 83). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han, in view of Chang (US 2011/0175876). • Regarding claims 6 and 14, Han discloses everything claimed, as applied to claims 4 and 13, respectively. However, Han fails to disclose the additional details of the first digital-to-analog converter. In the same field of endeavor, Chang discloses where: Claim 6: the first digital-to-analog converter comprises: a resistor string circuit configured to divide a voltage into voltages having a plurality of levels based on a first reference voltage and a second reference voltage, and output the divided voltages (element 240 in figure 3A and ¶s 35-37); and a controller configured to change a level of the park voltage based on the voltages output from the resistor string circuit and the park voltage control value, and output the level-changed park voltage (element 244 in figure 3A and ¶s 35-37). Claim 14: the first digital-to-analog converter comprises: a resistor string circuit configured to divide a voltage into voltages having a plurality of levels based on a first reference voltage and a second reference voltage, and output the divided voltages (element 240 in figure 3A and ¶s 35-37); and a controller configured to change a level of the park voltage based on the voltages output from the resistor string circuit and the park voltage control value, and output the level-changed park voltage (element 244 in figure 3A and ¶s 35-37). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the invention of Han according to the teachings of Chang, for the purpose of generating a digitally controlled voltage (¶ 47). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han, in view of Saitoh et al (US 2014/0118421; hereinafter Saitoh). • Regarding claim 7, Han discloses everything claimed, as applied to claim 1. However, Han fails to disclose the additional details of the display device. In the same field of endeavor, Saitoh discloses where: Claim 7: the data driver comprises a plurality of data drivers (elements 6-1 through 6-3 in figure 1), and the plurality of data drivers generates the park voltage based on a park voltage reference voltage value output from a representative data driver (inherent in the combination of Han and Saitoh). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the invention of Han according to the teachings of Saitoh, for the purpose of reducing the size and power consumption of a display device (¶s 15-17). Closing Remarks/Comments Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN DANIELSEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4248. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at (571) 272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN DANIELSEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706056
Scanning Drive Circuit, Display, and Electronic Device
12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699447
EXTERNAL USER INTERFACE FOR HEAD WORN COMPUTING
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699467
ELECTRONIC PEN AND CORE BODY FOR ELECTRONIC PEN
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700351
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12682830
PIXEL OF A DISPLAY DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 6m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 957 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month