Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/386,740

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Priority
Dec 16, 2024 — JP 2024-219618
Examiner
BIBBEE, CHAYCE R
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Lenovo Japan LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
320 granted / 510 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
542
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
83.7%
+43.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 510 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/12/2025 and 03/05/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 7, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Murphy (U.S. Pat # 6,114,958). Consider claim 1. Murphy teaches An electronic apparatus comprising a first chassis; (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 41-42, The computer 100 includes a first member or lid 102). a second chassis; (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 44-45, The computer 100 further includes a second member or body 106). and a controller, (Fig. 1 and col. 3 line 39, computer 100, thus a controller). wherein the first chassis includes: a display; (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 41-42, The computer 100 includes a first member or lid 102 which provides a display screen 104). and a touch sensor having a plurality of detection elements to detect touch or approach of an input device on or to the display, (Fig. 1 and col. 1 lines 13-19, Many types of electronic devices such as calculators, personal planners, portable, handheld, or "palm-top," computers, for example, which are manufactured today, often use a stylus, otherwise known as a touch pen, in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, to implement computer operations. For convenience, such devices will be referred to generically herein as "computers.". Col. 3 lines 2-4, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer having a stylus, a channel for receiving the stylus therein, and a touch-sensitive screen.). and the controller is configured to: detect a position where the input device touches or approaches the display based on output signals of the plurality of detection elements when a state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is an open state; (Fig. 1 and col. 1 lines 13-19, Many types of electronic devices such as calculators, personal planners, portable, handheld, or "palm-top," computers, for example, which are manufactured today, often use a stylus, otherwise known as a touch pen, in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, to implement computer operations. For convenience, such devices will be referred to generically herein as "computers.". Col. 3 lines 2-4, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer having a stylus, a channel for receiving the stylus therein, and a touch-sensitive screen. Col. 3 lines 47-51, The first member 102 is coupled to the second member 106 by a hinge 110 that allows the first member 102 to swing away from the second member 106 when the computer is "opened" for use by an operator, thus when the computer is opened it operates as touch screen for detecting the stylus). determine whether or not the input device is housed on the first chassis or the second chassis based on output signals of the plurality of detection elements when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is a closed state; (Figs. 1 and 2 as well as Col. 4 lines 28-33, The system 200 includes a stylus switch 202 for indicating when the stylus 122 (FIG. 1) is positioned within the stylus receiver 124 (FIG. 1) of the computer 100. The system 200 further includes an "open/closed" switch 204 for indicating when the computer 100 is in an open or closed position.). and output a warning when determining that the input device is not housed on the first chassis or the second chassis. (Col. 4 lines 42-49, Both the stylus switch 202 and the open/closed switch 204 are connected to a detection circuit 206. The detection circuit 206 detects when the computer 100 is in a closed position and when the stylus 122 is not properly positioned within the stylus receiver 124. When such a situation occurs, the detection circuit sends a signal to a circuit 208 which produces a humanly perceptible warning such as a beep or audible alarm and/or a flashing light.). Consider claim 7. Murphy teaches A control method for an electronic apparatus including a first chassis (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 41-42, The computer 100 includes a first member or lid 102). and a second chassis, (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 44-45, The computer 100 further includes a second member or body 106). comprising: detecting, when a state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is an open state, a position where an input device touches or approaches a display placed on the first chassis based on output signals of a plurality of detection elements equipped in a touch sensor placed on the first chassis; (Fig. 1 and col. 1 lines 13-19, Many types of electronic devices such as calculators, personal planners, portable, handheld, or "palm-top," computers, for example, which are manufactured today, often use a stylus, otherwise known as a touch pen, in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, to implement computer operations. For convenience, such devices will be referred to generically herein as "computers.". Col. 3 lines 2-4, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer having a stylus, a channel for receiving the stylus therein, and a touch-sensitive screen. Col. 3 lines 47-51, The first member 102 is coupled to the second member 106 by a hinge 110 that allows the first member 102 to swing away from the second member 106 when the computer is "opened" for use by an operator, thus when the computer is opened it operates as touch screen for detecting the stylus). determining, when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is a closed state, whether or not the input device is housed on the first chassis or the second chassis based on output signals of the plurality of detection elements; (Figs. 1 and 2 as well as Col. 4 lines 28-33, The system 200 includes a stylus switch 202 for indicating when the stylus 122 (FIG. 1) is positioned within the stylus receiver 124 (FIG. 1) of the computer 100. The system 200 further includes an "open/closed" switch 204 for indicating when the computer 100 is in an open or closed position.). and outputting, when determining that the input device is not housed on the first chassis or the second chassis, a warning. (Col. 4 lines 42-49, Both the stylus switch 202 and the open/closed switch 204 are connected to a detection circuit 206. The detection circuit 206 detects when the computer 100 is in a closed position and when the stylus 122 is not properly positioned within the stylus receiver 124. When such a situation occurs, the detection circuit sends a signal to a circuit 208 which produces a humanly perceptible warning such as a beep or audible alarm and/or a flashing light.). Consider claim 8. Murphy teaches A non-transitory computer-readable medium for an electronic apparatus including a first chassis (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 41-42, The computer 100 includes a first member or lid 102). and a second chassis, (Fig. 1 and col. 3 lines 44-45, The computer 100 further includes a second member or body 106). comprising programs to cause the electronic apparatus to: detect, when a state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is an open state, a position where an input device touches or approaches a display placed on the first chassis based on output signals of a plurality of detection elements equipped in a touch sensor placed on the first chassis; (Fig. 1 and col. 1 lines 13-19, Many types of electronic devices such as calculators, personal planners, portable, handheld, or "palm-top," computers, for example, which are manufactured today, often use a stylus, otherwise known as a touch pen, in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, to implement computer operations. For convenience, such devices will be referred to generically herein as "computers.". Col. 3 lines 2-4, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer having a stylus, a channel for receiving the stylus therein, and a touch-sensitive screen. Col. 3 lines 47-51, The first member 102 is coupled to the second member 106 by a hinge 110 that allows the first member 102 to swing away from the second member 106 when the computer is "opened" for use by an operator, thus when the computer is opened it operates as touch screen for detecting the stylus). determine, when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is a closed state, whether or not the input device is housed on the first chassis or the second chassis based on output signals of the plurality of detection elements; (Figs. 1 and 2 as well as Col. 4 lines 28-33, The system 200 includes a stylus switch 202 for indicating when the stylus 122 (FIG. 1) is positioned within the stylus receiver 124 (FIG. 1) of the computer 100. The system 200 further includes an "open/closed" switch 204 for indicating when the computer 100 is in an open or closed position.). and output, when determining that the input device is not housed on the first chassis or the second chassis, a warning. (Col. 4 lines 42-49, Both the stylus switch 202 and the open/closed switch 204 are connected to a detection circuit 206. The detection circuit 206 detects when the computer 100 is in a closed position and when the stylus 122 is not properly positioned within the stylus receiver 124. When such a situation occurs, the detection circuit sends a signal to a circuit 208 which produces a humanly perceptible warning such as a beep or audible alarm and/or a flashing light.). Consider claim 5. Murphy further teaches The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the open state, the controller sets a detection threshold value to a first value, wherein a value of each of the output signals of the plurality of detection elements is compared with the detection threshold value to determine that the input device is touching or approaching the display, (Fig. 1 and col. 1 lines 13-19, Many types of electronic devices such as calculators, personal planners, portable, handheld, or "palm-top," computers, for example, which are manufactured today, often use a stylus, otherwise known as a touch pen, in conjunction with a touch sensitive screen, to implement computer operations. For convenience, such devices will be referred to generically herein as "computers.". Col. 3 lines 2-4, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer having a stylus, a channel for receiving the stylus therein, and a touch-sensitive screen. Col. 3 lines 47-51, The first member 102 is coupled to the second member 106 by a hinge 110 that allows the first member 102 to swing away from the second member 106 when the computer is "opened" for use by an operator, thus when the computer is opened it operates as touch screen for detecting the stylus and therefore would have a detection threshold for when the stylus contacts the screen). and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the closed state, the controller sets the detection threshold value to a second value lower than the first value. (Col. 4 lines 42-49, Both the stylus switch 202 and the open/closed switch 204 are connected to a detection circuit 206. The detection circuit 206 detects when the computer 100 is in a closed position and when the stylus 122 is not properly positioned within the stylus receiver 124, thus a second threshold). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murphy (U.S. Pat # 6,114,958) in view Zhang et al (WO 2021/000252 A1). Consider claim 4. Murphy does not specifically disclose The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the open state, the controller sets a gain of the plurality of detection elements to a first value, and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the closed state, the controller sets the gain to a second value higher than the first value. However Zhang et al in the highlighted section of the attached document discloses an electronic pen detection method wherein when the active pen is far away from the touch screen, or when the active pen is close to the edge of the touch screen, the active pen detects that the amplitude of the sampling signal output by the ADC circuit 203 is less than the first threshold and controls the pre-amplification circuit 201 to amplify Gain, at this time, the active pen is easier to detect useful signals, so the active pen has higher sensitivity, so that the active pen is farther from the touch screen or the active pen is close to the edge of the touch screen. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the features of Zhang et al with the invention of Murphy so that the pen is easier to detect useful signals, so the active pen has higher sensitivity (Zhang et al highlighted section). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Consider claim 2. The prior art of record does not teach or render obvious “The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of detection elements are arranged in a first area and a second area other than the first area, wherein the first area corresponds to a position where the input device is housed on the first chassis or the second chassis, when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the open state, the controller detects the position where the input device touches or approaches the display based on output signals of the plurality of detection elements arranged in the first area and the second area, and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the closed state, the controller determines whether or not the input device is housed on the first chassis or the second chassis based on output signals of detection elements arranged in the first area among the plurality of detection elements.” Consider claim 3. The prior art of record does not teach or render obvious “The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the open state, the controller acquires output signals of the plurality of detection elements at a first rate, and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the closed state, the controller acquires output signals of the plurality of detection elements at a second rate lower than the first rate.” Consider claim 6. The prior art of record does not teach or render obvious “The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of detection elements contain: a plurality of first detection elements for detecting a position where the input device touches the display; and a plurality of second detection elements for detecting a position where the input device approaches the display, and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the open state, the controller acquires output signals of the plurality of first detection elements and output signals of the plurality of second detection elements, and when the state of the first chassis relative to the second chassis is the closed state, the controller acquires output signals of the plurality of second detection elements.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHAYCE R BIBBEE whose telephone number is (571)270-7222. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHAYCE R BIBBEE/Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676110
PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT, PIXEL DRIVING METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670844
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669707
Through the Lens Heads-Up Display
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669861
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670880
SCAN DRIVING METHOD FOR HIGH-QUALITY IMAGE AND CHOLESTERIC LIQUID-CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAME
1y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (+3.8%)
3y 1m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 510 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month