Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/387,087

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Priority
Nov 18, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0164378
Examiner
BOYD, JONATHAN A
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
494 granted / 716 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
78.1%
+38.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 716 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTIONNotice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-26 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of copending Application No. 19/323,303 (US 2026/0150532) (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant application is a broader recitation and an amalgamation of various claims in the copending application, as shown below. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Instant Application 19/387,087 Copending Application No. 19/323,303 1. A display apparatus comprising: a data line configured to supply a data voltage; an initialization voltage line configured to supply an initialization voltage; a reference voltage line configured to supply a reference voltage; a light emitting element configured to emit light during a driving section; a sensing line configured to receive a sensing signal during a sensing section; a hold line configured to supply a hold signal; a first transistor configured to control a driving current flowing in the light-emitting element; a second transistor connected between the data line and a first node, which is a gate electrode of the first transistor; a third transistor connected between the initialization voltage line and a second node, which is a source electrode of the first transistor; a fourth transistor connected between the hold line and a third node; a fifth transistor connected between the reference voltage line and the first node; and a sixth transistor connected between the second node and the sensing line, wherein gate electrodes of the fifth and sixth transistors are connected to the third node. 1. A display device, comprising: a substrate; a first light shielding layer disposed on the substrate; a second light shielding layer disposed on the first light shielding layer; an active layer disposed on the second light shielding layer and including a semiconductor region of Claim 1 recited below (bolded)Claim 3 recites an initialization voltage lineClaim 9 recites a reference voltage lineClaim 1 recited below (bolded)Claims 2 recites a sensing lineClaim 1 recited below (bolded)a first transistor; a gate layer including a gate electrode of the first transistor disposed on the active layer; a first source metal layer including a first hold line disposed on the gate layer, the first source metal layer extending in a first direction and configured to supply a hold signal; a second source metal layer including a second hold line disposed on the first source metal layer, the second source metal layer extending in a second direction intersecting the first direction and connected to the first hold line; a light emitting element including a pixel electrode disposed on the second source metal layer; a second transistor configured to supply a data voltage to a first node being at a gate electrode of the first transistor, based on a first scan signal; a third transistor configured to supply an initialization voltage to a second node being at a source electrode of the first transistor, based on a second scan signal; a fourth transistor configured to supply the hold signal to a third node based on the first scan signal; a fifth transistor electrically connecting a reference voltage line and the first node based on a voltage of the third node; and a sixth transistor electrically connecting the second node and a sensing line based on a voltage of the third node. As can be shown above, the instant application claim 1 is a broader recitation and an amalgamation of claims 1, 2, 3 and 9 of the copending application. Independent claim 17 is an amalgamation of claims 1, 2, 3 and 5-9 where claims 5-8 recite the details of the first and second capacitor. The dependent claims read on various dependent claims of the copending application or are well known features of display devices. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: JEONG et al (2022/0051629) teaches the closest prior art, however fails to teach the entirety of the independent claim. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN A BOYD whose telephone number is (571)270-7503. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at (571) 272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN A BOYD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682639
METHOD FOR DETECTING URINE FORMED ELEMENTS BASED ON DEEP LEARNING AND CONTEXT RELATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682848
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669877
DEVICE DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663885
METHOD FOR PROVIDING INPUT EVENT TO VIRTUAL OBJECT, HOST, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663880
VIRTUAL REALITY CONTROL DEVICE AND VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 10m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 716 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month