Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/390,832

NANOPARTICLE-ENTRAINED MULTIFUNCTIONAL NANOSTRUCTURE-COATED MOBILE CARRIERS, AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF UTILIZING SAME TO TREAT CONTAMINATED WATER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Priority
Jan 27, 2023 — divisional of 12/503,376
Examiner
BASS, DIRK R
Art Unit
1779
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Woodard & Curran Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 854 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 854 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Applicant’s request for continued examination filed July 16, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim 53 is amended and claim 65 is newly added. Claims 53-65 are pending and further considered on the merits. Response to Amendment In light of applicant’s amendment, the examiner modifies the grounds of rejection set forth in the office action filed May 6, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 53-63 and 65 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ribet et al., WO 2021/173608 in view of Boltz et al., US 2015/0336827 (Boltz). For the purposes of examination, the examiner is relying on the US national stage entry of WO 2021/173608, hereinafter referred to/from as US 2023/0084588 (Ribet). Regarding claim 53, Ribet discloses a mobile carrier for removing and recovering one or more contaminants from water (see “magnetic nanoparticle coated porous materials”, abstract), the mobile carrier comprising a core (see “porous substrate”, abstract, ¶ 0015) coated with a porous and non-reactive binding agent comprising one or more types of nanoparticles (see “magnetic nanoparticles, abstract, ¶ 0015), wherein the mobile carrier has a dimension of 1 to 12,500 microns (see “the nanoparticles may have each of their three dimensions on the order of 1000 nm or less”, ¶ 0017). While Ribet discloses the overall size and material of the mobile carrier depends on the application and desired results (¶ 0021-0024), Ribet does not disclose the mobile carrier having a density of 0.01 to 20 g/cm3 or thickness or diameter of 1 to 12500 microns. However, Boltz discloses coated particulate absorbents (abstract) where the apparent density can be modified by material selection in order to provide absorbents having a density greater than or less than water depending on the desired application, the density of polyurethane core absorbents ranging from 1.01 to 1.20 g/cm3 (¶ 0073). Additionally, Boltz discloses that the size of the absorbents can range from 500nm to 5mm (¶ 0071), where an optimal particle loading can be achieved by balancing surface area with respect to overall size. At the time of invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the mobile carrier of Ribet to have a size and density as described in Boltz, in order to facilitate liquid-particle and/or particle-particle separation based on the particle size and apparent density compared to that of water (Boltz, ¶ 0071-0073). Lastly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the mobile carrier size and density of Ribet in light of Boltz, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art absent a showing of criticality or unexpected results (MPEP 2144.05, Section II, Part A). Regarding claims 54-57, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier having a shape, size, and porosity formed through one or more physical processes, chemical processes, or physical-chemical processes (see “substrate may be composed of natural or synthetic materials”, ¶ 0021). Regarding claims 58-59, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier having either a net negative or positive charge (¶ 0097). Regarding claims 60-61, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier wherein the core is formed through one or more natural, physical, chemical, or physical-chemical processes (see “the porous substrate may be composed of natural or synthetic materials”, ¶ 0021). Regarding claim 62, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier wherein the core comprises a hydrophobic polymer (¶ 0024). Regarding claim 63, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier wherein the non-reactive binding agent comprises one or more magnetic nanoparticles (abstract, ¶ 0015). Regarding claim 65, Ribet (in view of Boltz) discloses a mobile carrier wherein the porous and non-reactive binding agent has a thickness of 0.001 to 1,000 microns (¶ 0017). Claim(s) 64 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ribet in view of Boltz as relied upon in the rejection of claim 53 set forth above, and in further view of Namiki, US 2014/0042068 (Namiki). Regarding claim 64, Ribet (in view of Boltz) does not disclose the porous and non-reactive binding agent comprising one or more ion exchange resins. However, Namiki discloses composite particles for removing components from contaminated fluids (abstract) wherein the composite particles have a coating comprising magnetic nanoparticles and ion exchange resins (¶ 0069-0071). At the time of invention, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the mobile carrier of Ribet (in view of Boltz) to include the ion exchange resin described in Namiki in order to provide additional binding modalities for decontamination of fluids. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments been fully considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIRK R BASS whose telephone number is (571)270-7370. The examiner can normally be reached 8-4:30 EST Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bobby Ramdhanie can be reached at (571) 270-3240. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DIRK R. BASS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1779 /DIRK R BASS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1779
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
May 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746516
A METHOD OF FORMING A CROSS-LINKED POLYMERIC MEMBRANE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747175
RECYCLING SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748088
A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTION AND ANALYSIS OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS IN A SAMPLE SUBJECTED TO A CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATION ON A LAYERED SEPARATING MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741068
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MITOCHONDRIA-RICH PLASMA
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728411
ION EXCHANGER FILTER DEVICE AND ION EXCHANGER CARTRIDGE
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.8%)
3y 9m (~2y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 854 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month