Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/399,915

TELESCOPIC CYLINDER WITH VARIABLE VOLUME FEED CHANNELS AND CYLINDER CONTROL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Priority
Nov 26, 2024 — IT 102024000026637
Examiner
LESLIE, MICHAEL S
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Manitou Italia S R L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
922 granted / 1138 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1154
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1138 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10, 12, & 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “it” in line 9, which renders the claim indefinite because a determination as to what “it” refers cannot be made. The term “it” should be replaced by the intended claimed structure. Claims 2-10 are rejected due to their dependence from Claim 1. Claims 12 & 14-16 each recite the limitation "The method" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Apparently, Claims 12 & 14-16 should depend from --claim 11-- instead of “claim 10”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 & 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)&(a)(2) as being anticipated by Baraniak (5111733). Baraniak discloses a telescopic cylinder (e.g. 1), comprising: a first cylinder, comprising a first piston (e.g. 8) slidable in a sealed fashion in a jacket (e.g. 7) which comprises an extension chamber (e.g. 13) and a re-entry chamber (e.g. 14), separated from each other by a head of the first piston; a second cylinder, comprising a second piston (e.g. 3) slidable in a sealed fashion in a jacket (e.g. 2) which comprises an extension chamber (e.g. 11) and a re-entry chamber (e.g. 12), separated from each other by a head of the second piston; wherein the jacket of the first piston is integral with the second piston (e.g. as shown in Figs. 1-2); wherein it comprises a compensating device, provided with a control module (e.g. 107, 110, 114, Col. 8, Ln. 25-68) configured for adjusting a compensating flow rate of operating fluid to be fed to the extension chamber or discharged from the extension chamber of the second cylinder as a function of a variation of volume per unit time of the extension chamber of the first cylinder (e.g. Col. 8, Ln. 9-24). The telescopic cylinder comprising a conduit (e.g. 15, Figs. 1-2) for connection to the extension chamber of the second cylinder which is made at least partly through said first piston and said second piston; wherein the connecting conduit comprises a tubular element (e.g. 15), integral with the second piston and protruding concentrically with the longitudinal axis in a seat of the first piston (e.g. 16); and the control module is configured for adjusting said compensating flow rate in such a way as to keep constant the pressure inside the extension chamber of the second cylinder (e.g. Col. 8, Ln. 9-24). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 11 & 13 are allowed. Claims 12 & 14-16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Additional references listed on form PTO-892 are cited for their relevance to the disclosed invention and demonstration of the state of the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL LESLIE whose telephone number is (571)272-4819. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8 am - 4-30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571)272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL LESLIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 June 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12649213
SUBSTRATE POLISHING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12650109
WIND-BASED POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12650124
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF SEALING FLUIDS AT ECCENTRIC TEMPERATURES IN STATIC AND DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12650136
HYDRAULIC DRIVE DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644447
PISTON FOR A COMPRESSOR, COMPRESSOR, AND METHOD AND REMOVAL TOOL FOR DISASSEMBLING A PISTON
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 4m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1138 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month