Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/403,580

ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Priority
May 31, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0070088 +2 more
Examiner
YODICHKAS, ANEETA
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
512 granted / 713 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 713 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it exceeds 150 words in length. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0066724 A1 to Moon et al. As to claim 1, Moon discloses an electronic device comprising: a foldable housing including a first housing and a second housing coupled to be foldable or unfoldable with respect to each other (Fig. 2A, paragraph 0052, first and second housing (210, 220)); memory, comprising one or more storage media, storing instructions (Fig. 1, paragraph 0029, memory (130)); at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory (Fig. 1, paragraph 0029, processor (120)); at least one sensor (Fig. 1, paragraph 0029, sensor module (176)); a flexible display disposed on at least a portion of a first surface of the foldable housing to be foldable or unfoldable (Fig. 2A, paragraph 0051, display (230)); and a cover display disposed on at least a portion of a second surface of the first housing (Fig. 2A, paragraph 0051, cover (265)), wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: determine a bending angle of the foldable housing by using the at least one sensor (Fig. 15, paragraph 0201, where in step (1520) the bending angle is determined), determine a stand state of the foldable housing by using the at least one sensor (Fig. 14A-D, paragraphs 0187-0198, where the angle detected determines the stand state), based on the bending angle and the stand state, identify a display on which visual information is to be displayed (Fig. 15, paragraph 0202, where in step (1530) at least one area for displaying is determined), and control the display, based on the visual information (Fig. 15, paragraph 0203, where in step (1540), the visual information on the area for displaying is determined). As to claim 2, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to: in case that the bending angle is determined to be within a specific angle range, determine that the foldable housing is in a flex state (Fig. 9 and 10, paragraphs 0150-0171, where if the angle is not 180o, it is determined the housing structure (610) is in a flex state); in case that a rear surface of the first housing or a rear surface of the second housing is determined to face a ground in the flex state, determine that the electronic device is in a first stand state (Fig. 9 and 10, paragraphs 0150-0171, where if the angle is 180o, it is determined the housing structure (610) is facing the ground); and determine information about a distance between the electronic device and an object by using the at least one sensor (Fig. 1, paragraph 0038, where sensor module (176) includes a proximity sensor). As to claim 3, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to: in case that the electronic device is in the first stand state and the bending angle is within a first angle range, control the visual information to be displayed on the flexible display and the cover display; and in case that the electronic device is in the first stand state and the bending angle is within a second angle range, control the visual information to be displayed on the flexible display (Fig. 14A-14D, paragraphs 0187-0198, where the message moves based on the angle of housing (610)). As to claim 4, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to, in case that the electronic device and the object are within a predetermined distance, control an intensity of the visual information to be increased (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where based on the angle change of the housing structure (610, 611, 613), the user interface (1210, 1220, 1230) changes color). As to claim 5, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to: in case that the electronic device is in a second stand state and the bending angle is within a first angle range, control the visual information to be displayed on the cover display; and in case that the electronic device is in the second stand state and the bending angle is within a second angle range, control the visual information to be displayed on the flexible display and the cover display (Fig. 14A-14D, paragraphs 0187-0198, where the message moves based on the angle of housing (610)). As to claim 6, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to, in case that the electronic device and the object are within a predetermined distance, control an intensity of visual information to be increased (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where based on the angle change of the housing structure (610, 611, 613), the user interface (1210, 1220, 1230) changes color). As to claim 7, Moon discloses the electronic device, wherein the visual information comprises a visual effect and/or an object, and is produced using a color code or a color of a currently executing application (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where based on the angle change of the housing structure (610, 611, 613), the user interface (1210, 1220, 1230) changes color). As to claim 8, Moon discloses limitations similar to claim 1. As to claim 9, Moon discloses limitations similar to claim 2. In addition, Moon discloses in case that a first edge of the first housing and/or a second edge of the second housing is determined to face the ground in the flex state, determining that the electronic device is in a second stand state (Fig. 5 and 10, paragraphs 0119-0121 and 0163-0171, where if edge areas (522, 524, 526) face the ground, it is determined the housing (610) is folded). As to claims 10 and 18, Moon discloses limitations similar to claim 3. As to claims 11-14, Moon discloses limitations similar to claims 4-7, respectively. As to claim 15, Moon discloses the method, wherein the object includes a wall or the ground (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where the electronic device (400) lays on a surface, such as the ground). As to claim 16, Moon discloses the method, wherein the object comprises the ground (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where the electronic device (400) lays on a surface, such as the ground), and wherein the method further comprises, when the electronic device is in a second stand state and the bending angle is withing a third angle range, controlling the visual information to be displayed on a cover display (Fig. 12, paragraphs 0178-0179, where based on the angle change of the housing structure (610, 611, 613), the user interface (1210, 1220, 1230) changes color). As to claim 17, Moon discloses one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more computer programs including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of an electronic device individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to perform operations (Fig. 1, paragraph 0230, where the non-transitory computer-readable storage media are internal and external memories (136, 138), processor (120)). In addition, Moon discloses limitations similar to claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANEETA YODICHKAS whose telephone number is (571)272-9773. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANEETA YODICHKAS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2627 /ANEETA YODICHKAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748501
Keypad Controller Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731534
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730327
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724514
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718421
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OUTPUTTING VIRTUAL SMOKE IMAGE
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+25.0%)
2y 7m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 713 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month