Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/411,191

IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 06, 2025
Priority
Oct 04, 2016 — RE 10-2016-0127893 +9 more
Examiner
WILLIAMS, JEFFERY A
Art Unit
2488
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
B1 Institute of Image Technology Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 12m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
774 granted / 926 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
990
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
76.1%
+36.1% vs TC avg
§102
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 926 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6, and 7 recite the limitation “whereas the reconstructed image after the image resizing is not used as a reference image for predicting an image other than the reconstructed image” (i.e. only spatial prediction using the resized image is performed). The applicant’s originally filed specification fails to disclose this limitation. In the applicant’s remarks filed 6/22/2026, the applicant cites [0230] and [0231] of the applicant’s specification as disclosing this limitation. The examiner notes, [0231] states both the original image region and the padded region may be used for spatial reference and the data regarding the image before resizing (i.e. the original image region of the padded image) may be temporally referenced and the data regarding the added or deleted region cannot be temporally referenced (i.e. the original image portion may be temporally referenced while the padded portion is not temporally referenced although padding has been performed). Further, the cited paragraphs [0230] and [0231] do not explicitly preclude (as denoted by the word “not” in line 12 of claim 1) using a resized image for temporal prediction or for prediction of another frame other than the current resized frame. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFERY A WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)270-7579. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sath Perungavoor can be reached at 571-272-7455. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFERY A WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2488
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671917
SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671796
IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666078
ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12647588
DYNAMIC ADAPTATION OF VOLUMETRIC CONTENT COMPONENT SUB-BITSTREAMS IN STREAMING SERVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636125
AUTOMATIC DETECTION AND PROCESSING OF POOR-QUALITY VIRTUAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL DENTAL MODELS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 7m (~1y 12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 926 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month