Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/412,149

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 08, 2025
Priority
Sep 27, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0130931 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, LONG D
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 851 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
879
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 851 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The references cited in the IDS have been considered by examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A GATE DRIVER WITH DIFFERENT TRANSISTOR CHARACTERISTICS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ahn (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2023/0215381). Regarding claim 1, Ahn discloses a display device (100), (fig. 1, [0054]), comprising: a display panel (120) in which a plurality of pixels (P) are disposed, (fig. 1, [0055-0056]); and a gate driver (140) configured to supply a gate signal (GL) to the display panel (120), (fig. 1, [0067]), wherein the gate driver comprises: a pull-up transistor (T1) configured to pull up an output terminal (Output) in response to a signal of a Q node (Q), (fig. 5, [0127]); a pull-down transistor (T2) configured to pull down the output terminal (Output) in response to a signal of a QB node (QB), (fig. 5, [0128]); a first gate transistor (T3) configured to transmit a start signal (GVST) to a first node (Q2) in response to a first clock signal (GCLK), (fig. 5, [0122]); a transfer transistor (TA) configured to transmit a signal of the first node (Q2) to the Q node (Q) in response to a gate low voltage (VGL), (fig. 5, [0124-0125]); and a second gate transistor (T5) configured to transmit a gate high voltage (VGH) to the QB node (QB) in response to the signal of the first node (Q2), (fig. 5, [0148]). Regarding claim 2, Ahn discloses wherein the gate driver further comprises a third gate transistor (T4) configured to transmit the gate low voltage (VGL) to the QB node (QB) in response to the signal of the Q node (Q), (fig. 5, [0147]). Regarding claim 8, Ahn discloses further comprising a first capacitor (CQ) connected between the Q node (Q) and the output terminal (Output), (fig. 5, [0129]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahn in view of Kim et al (U.S. Patent Pub No. 2019/0057978). Regarding claim 9, Ahn discloses everything as specified above in claim 8. However, Ahn does not mention a second capacitor. In a similar field of endeavor, Kim teaches further comprising a second capacitor (CQB) connected between the QB node (QB) and the gate high voltage (VGH), (fig. 6, [0105]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ahn, by specifically providing the second capacitor, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of having a fast response time, [0003]. Claim(s) 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahn in view of Liu et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2024/0169904). Regarding claim 10, Ahn discloses everything as specified above in claim 1. However, Ahn does not mention the pixels comprising a light-emitting element. In a similar field of endeavor, Liu teaches wherein each of the plurality of pixels (fig. 1) comprises: a light-emitting element (OLED), (fig. 1, [0108]); a capacitor (C) configured to sample a data voltage (Da), (fig. 1, [0109]); a driving transistor (T3) configured to drive the light-emitting element (OLED) with a driving current corresponding to the data voltage (Vdata), (fig. 1, [0108-0109]); and at least one first transistor (T4) and at least one second transistor (T2) having characteristics different from those of the at least one first transistor (i.e. T4 is a p-type transistor and T2 is n-type transistor), (fig. 1, [0108]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ahn, by specifically providing the pixel circuit, as taught by Liu, for the purpose of emitting light for the display device. Regarding claim 11, Liu discloses wherein the driving transistor (T3) and the at least one first transistor (T4) include a polysilicon semiconductor layer (i.e. polycrystalline silicon transistors), (fig. 1, [0108]), and the at least one second transistor (T2) includes an oxide semiconductor layer (i.e. metal oxide transistors), (fig. 1, [0108]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ahn, by specifically providing the pixel circuit, as taught by Liu, for the purpose of emitting light for the display device. Regarding claim 12, Liu discloses wherein the driving transistor (T3) and the at least one first transistor (T4) are P-type thin-film transistors (P-type) , and the at least one second transistor (T2) is an N-type thin-film transistor (N-type), (fig. 1, [0108]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Ahn, by specifically providing the pixel circuit, as taught by Liu, for the purpose of emitting light for the display device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowance Claim 3, none of the prior art of record teaches alone or in combination the limitation “wherein the gate driver further comprises a fourth gate transistor configured to transmit the signal of the Q node to the third gate transistor in response to a second clock signal.” Claims 4-7 are dependent upon claim 3 and are allowed for the reason mentioned above in claim 3. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG D PHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-5573. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh D Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LONG D PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12755687
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749458
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744001
DATA DRIVER FOR DISPLAY AND SENSING CIRCUIT THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744006
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A PLURALITY OF VOLTAGE LINES IN A BEZEL AREA AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743992
LED DISPLAY DRIVING CIRCUIT AND LED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 7m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 851 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month