Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/421,017

METHOD OF JOINING CLADDED PIPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Priority
Dec 19, 2024 — provisional 63/736,238
Examiner
PATEL, DEVANG R
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Paul Po CHENG)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
687 granted / 1048 resolved
+0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1048 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moe et al. (US 2005/0236372, hereafter “Moe”) in view of Zelahy et al. (US 4144433, hereafter “Zelahy”), and further as evidenced by Bliault et al. (WO 98/33619 A1, see attached). Regarding claim 1, Moe discloses a method of joining cladded pipes (figs. 1-4, forge welding- [0001-0003]) comprising: (a) providing first and second cladded pipes 11-12 (fig. 3) or 20-21 (fig. 4) having respective first and second base elements and first and second cladding elements 13 or 24 (inner cladding, [0029], [0032]) secured to the first and second base elements respectively, the first and second base elements including respective first and second pockets (concave/wedges- [0030-0031]) formed at least one of first and second ends of the first and second cladded pipes (fig. 3-4); (b) positioning the first and second cladded pipes to locate the first end of the first pipe opposite the second end of the second pipe, wherein the first and second ends are spaced apart to define a gap therebetween; (g-h) moving one of the first and second cladded pipes relative to the other, wherein at least portions of the heated parts of the first and second cladding elements are extruded into the first and second pockets (figs. 2, 4, [0010, 0027]). Moe discloses heating of the pipe ends to be joined using any known heating technique, including induction/EM, infrared [0002-0003], but does not specifically show positioning at least one heating element in the gap for heating the pipe ends. Nonetheless, Zelahy (also drawn to metal bonding) discloses formed pockets 32a/32b at both first and second ends 12a/12b of the first and second components 10a-10b to be joined by forging, wherein the first and second ends are spaced apart to define a gap therebetween (see fig. 5). Zelahy teaches (c) positioning a heating element 24 (induction coil- fig. 5, col. 3, lines 52-55) in the gap between end parts of the first and second components 12a-12b and heating to a hot working temperature at which the heated parts are plastically deformable (col. 4, lines 1-20); (d) covering the heated parts with an inert atmosphere (examiner takes official notice with respect to providing an inert atmosphere for the heated parts, at least at the interface, since such feature is conventionally known and doing so would prevent oxidation- see evidence Bliault WO 98/33619 A1- inert gas sealed chamber 17/18- fig. 1); (e) energizing said at least one heating element/coil, to heat the heated parts to the hot working temperature; (f) removing said at least one heating element from the gap (retracting from the gap- col. 3, line 61); (g) while the heated parts are at the hot working temperature, engaging the first and second ends together; (h) while the heated parts are at the hot working temperature, and while the first and second ends are engaged, moving one or both of the first and second components relative to the other, wherein at least portions of the heated parts of the first and second components are extruded into the first and second pockets. Given teachings of Zelahy, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide facing portions of two pipe ends having pockets in order to provide interference fit and to position a heating element in the gap for the purpose of supplying necessary heating at the interface as desired in the joining method of Moe. Thus, Moe as modified by Zelahy renders the claimed steps obvious. Regarding claims 2-4, Moe discloses a method of joining cladded pipes (figs. 1-4; forge welding- [0001-0003]) comprising: providing a first cladded pipe 11/20/30, the first cladded pipe including a first cladded pipe base element and a first cladded pipe cladding element secured to the first cladded pipe base element, the first cladded pipe base element including a pocket (concave wedges- [0030-0031]) adjacent a first cladded pipe extension end of the first cladded pipe cladding element (note that term “extension end” is broad and not limited by any dimensions), the first cladded pipe extension end located at a connection end of the first cladded pipe; providing a second cladded pipe 12/21/31, the second cladded pipe including a second cladded pipe base element and a second cladded pipe cladding element secured to the second cladded pipe base element, the second cladded pipe extension end located at a connection end of the second cladded pipe; positioning the first and second cladded pipes such that the connection ends of the first and second cladded pipes face each other and define a gap therebetween (figs. 2-3); heating sections of the connection ends of the first and second cladded pipes to a hot working temperature (note that “hot working temperature” is open and not limited by any range), the sections seen as heated parts of the first and second cladded pipes; engaging the connection ends of the first and second cladded pipes; and moving at least one of the first and second cladded pipes relative to the other, wherein at least portions of the first cladded pipe extension end and the second cladded pipe extension end are extruded into the pockets of the first cladded pipe and the second cladded pipe respectively (figs. 2, 4, [0010, 0027, 0032]). Examiner takes official notice with respect to providing an inert atmosphere for the heating sections of the connection ends of both pipes since such technique is conventional and doing so would prevent oxidation (see evidence Bliault WO 98/33619 A1- inert gas sealed chamber 17/18- fig. 1). Moe discloses heating of the pipe ends to be joined using any known heating technique, including induction/EM, infrared [0002-0003], but does not specifically show positioning at least one heating element in the gap for heating the pipe ends. Nonetheless, Zelahy (also drawn to metal bonding) discloses formed pockets 32a/32b at both first and second ends 12a/12b of the first and second components 10a-10b to be joined by forging, wherein the first and second ends are spaced apart to define a gap therebetween (see fig. 5). Zelahy teaches positioning a heating element 24 (induction coil- fig. 5, col. 3, lines 52-55) in the gap between end parts of the first and second components 12a-12b and heating to a hot working temperature at which the heated parts are plastically deformable (col. 4, lines 1-20); energizing said at least one heating element/coil, to heat the heated parts to the hot working temperature; engaging the connection ends together; and moving one or both of the first and second components relative to the other, wherein at least portions of the heated parts of the first and second components are extruded into the first and second pockets. Given teachings of Zelahy, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide facing connection ends of the two cladded pipes having pockets in order to provide interference fit and to position a heating element in the gap for the purpose of supplying necessary heating at the interface as desired in the joining method of Moe. Thus, Moe as modified by Zelahy renders the claimed steps obvious. As to claims 5-6, both Mor and Zelahy shows that engaging the connection ends of the first and second cladded pipes comprises applying a translocation motion or an engagement motion to at least one of the first cladded pipe or second cladded pipe (Moe- pressing [0016, 0030]; Zelahy- fig. 5- see movement arrow 28). A person of ordinary skill would readily recognize that one or both cladded pipes are moved so as to apply the necessary force/pressure for forge welding in Moe & Zelahy, thereby rendering the claims obvious. Information Disclosure Statement No information disclosure statement (IDS) has been submitted. Applicant is reminded of candor duty to disclose all information material to patentability. See MPEP 2001 and CFR 1.56). Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEVANG R PATEL whose telephone number is (571) 270-3636. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-5pm, EST. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/laws/interview-practice. Communications via Internet email are at the discretion of Applicant. If Applicant wishes to communicate via email, a written authorization form must be filed by Applicant: Form PTO/SB/439, available at www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The form may be filed via the Patent Center and can be found using the document description Internet Communications, see https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/forms. In limited circumstances, the Applicant may make an oral authorization for Internet communication. See MPEP § 502.03. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached on 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Center. For more information, see https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. For questions, technical issues or troubleshooting, please contact the Patent Electronic Business Center at ebc@uspto.gov or 1-866-217-9197 (toll-free). /DEVANG R PATEL/ Primary Examiner, AU 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768382
T-JOINT, BUILDING STRUCTURE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING T-JOINT
4y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760382
FORGED PART OF STEEL AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765418
METHOD FOR PANEL-LEVEL THERMO-COMPRESSION BONDING
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752366
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR JOINING AND REPAIR USING ULTRASONIC ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING WITH A CONTOURED SONOTRODE
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12745664
WIRE BONDING ARRAYS, MAINTENANCE STATIONS FOR WIRE BONDING ARRAYS, AND RELATED METHODS
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.0%)
2y 10m (~2y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1048 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month